d Bearer specs were approved by IESG to be
> sent to RFC Editor as of today.
> That means, it is essentially done.
>
> Nat
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Steven WIllmott wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
>
> Thanks for your answer - I can definitely understand the sentiments
gt; I hope that this makes sense to you. If you have any recommendations of what
> guidance developers would like to see I am sure we can put some information
> together.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> On Jul 29, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Steven WIllmott wrote:
>
>> Hi Hannes,
&g
y dies (that is already widely implemented and
> deployed).
>
> I would have liked to get the specification finished earlier myself and,
> funny enough, Eran is also responsible for the delay (although not the only
> person).
>
>
> On Jul 29, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Steven W
I certainly don't think it's dead - Eran makes some important points and the
current 2.0 spec has certainly dragged a long time to get final. The biggest
concern is fragmentation between implementations - the suggestion of using a
concrete instantiation (e.g. Facebook) only take you so far.
T
