I struggle to see the value in adding more fine grained machine readable
error messages for this.
Do we really want clients to try and negotiate the code_challenge_method
using browser redirects? Especially in light of the fact that we'll likely
also be discouraging AS's from redirecting on some
editorhatoffI find not much, if any. /editorhatoff
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 06:27 Brian Campbell bcampb...@pingidentity.com
wrote:
I struggle to see the value in adding more fine grained machine readable
error messages for this.
Do we really want clients to try and negotiate the
That pretty much was the conclusion we reached. I believe that it was what
the F2F room inclined to. So, for -04, we added a section on error response
but it doesn't have those granular errors.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 07:07 John Bradley ve7...@ve7jtb.com wrote:
hatoff Nat and I discussed it
I sent some feedback on that section in a different message on list.
On Friday, November 14, 2014 12:41 PM, Nat Sakimura sakim...@gmail.com
wrote:
That pretty much was the conclusion we reached. I believe that it was what the
F2F room inclined to. So, for -04, we added a section on
Thanks. I will dig it up.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:54 Bill Mills wmills_92...@yahoo.com wrote:
I sent some feedback on that section in a different message on list.
On Friday, November 14, 2014 12:41 PM, Nat Sakimura sakim...@gmail.com
wrote:
That pretty much was the conclusion we
As discussed at F2F today at IETF 91 OAuth WG, there has been some request
to have a more fine grained machine readable error messages.
Currently, it only returns the error defined in RFC6749 and any more
details is supposed to be returned in error_descripton and error_uri.
So, I came up with
).
-- Mike
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 10:49 AM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Adding machine readable errors to SPOP?
As discussed at F2F today at IETF 91 OAuth WG, there has been some request
[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Nat Sakimura
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 12, 2014 10:49 AM
*To:* oauth
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Adding machine readable errors to SPOP?
As discussed at F2F today at IETF 91 OAuth WG, there has been some request
to have a more fine grained machine readable
: [OAUTH-WG] Adding machine readable errors to SPOP? As discussed at F2F
today at IETF 91 OAuth WG, there has been some request to have a more fine
grained machine readable error messages. Currently, it only returns the error
defined in RFC6749 and any more details is supposed to be returned
