Done
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 12:59 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: JOSE -30 and JWT -24 drafts incorporating AD
feedback on fifth spec of five
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Mike Jones
Mike,
Thanks for the updated JWT draft. I just read through it again and the
changes look good.
I noticed that privacy considerations were not mentioned. Should there be
any discussed for claims, claim sets, etc.? This is bound to come up in
the IESG review if it is not addressed. Sorry I
Hello!
Thank you for all of the updates to the JOSE drafts in the current bundle
in review. I appreciate all of the effort that went into the revisions!
As I understand it, there are a few general issues we need to work
through, then a few nits/requests are included on specific drafts.
Knowing
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I can add something along these lines. Does that work for you?
*Privacy Considerations*
A JWT may contain privacy-sensitive information. When this is the case,
measures must be taken to prevent disclosure of
Replies inline…
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:56 AM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] FW: JOSE -30 and JWT -24 drafts incorporating AD
feedback on fifth spec of five
Hello!
Thank you for all of the
Thanks, Mike! In-line...
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Replies inline…
*From:* Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, July 03, 2014 11:56 AM
*To:* Mike Jones
*Cc:* oauth@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re:
From: Mike Jones
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 6:11 PM
To: j...@ietf.org
Subject: JOSE -30 and JWT -24 drafts incorporating AD feedback on fifth spec of
five
JOSE -30 and JWT -24 drafts have been posted incorporating improvements
resulting from Kathleen Moriarty's JWE review. At this point,
