[OAUTH-WG] Feedback on normative issues in OAuth2 draft 11 from implementers of draft 10

2011-01-10 Thread Mike Jones
Our implementers of draft 10 have raised the following issues with draft 11. Please address them before publishing a draft 12. I'll send editorial feedback in a separate message. 6.2 etc.: Specification MUST permit parameter extensibility There will be uses of OAuth2 where additional

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback on normative issues in OAuth2 draft 11 from implementers of draft 10

2011-01-10 Thread Richer, Justin P.
5.1.3 etc.: The name client_credentials is confusing The name client_credentials does not refer to the same concept as the uses of the term “Client Credentials” in 1.4.3, 3, 5.1.3, and other locations in the document. It would be far better to rename this parameter “none” or “implicit”,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback on normative issues in OAuth2 draft 11 from implementers of draft 10

2011-01-10 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
-Original Message- From: Mike Jones [mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:48 AM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Feedback on normative issues in OAuth2 draft 11 from implementers of draft 10 Our implementers of draft 10 have