[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran
Hammer-Lahav
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:30 PM
To: David Recordon
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
It's a clear example of defining facilities without *ANY* use cases
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
It's a clear example of defining facilities without *ANY* use cases or
requirements.
We have clear use cases and actual registration requests for the current
registries defined in v2.
What's most
of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
It's a clear example of defining facilities without *ANY* use cases or
requirements.
We have clear use cases and actual registration requests for the current
registries defined in v2.
What's most annoying about this entire push
-Original Message-
From: Justin Richer [mailto:jric...@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:38 PM
Having a standard set of oauth errors on the protected
resource is a good idea. That said:
Not practical. Given the wide range of token types and schemes, each will have
to
: Friday, March 11, 2011 6:04 PM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday,
March 18
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors
Registryhttp://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.html
My preference would be option A
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Jones
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:04 PM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday,
March 18
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer
for the same thing.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:15 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
I still
-
From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 4:15 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
I still haven't seen an explanation of what this registry accomplishes or why
...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of David Recordon
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 6:04 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
Has anyone extended error codes? Is there a list
@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:04 PM
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday,
March 18
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors
Registry to increase interoperability among implementations using the related
OAuth
Me too! :-)
EHL
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Phil Hunt
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 10:12 PM
Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
As I
...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Lucy Lynch
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry,
deadline Friday, March 18
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote:
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors
Registryhttp://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.html#errors-registry
to increase interoperability among implementations using the related OAuth
specifications. As you also know, there has been
Should option C read: No OAuth Errors Registry, but each specification may
specify its own set of errors. Or is this another option and C is different?
Phil
phil.h...@oracle.com
On 2011-03-11, at 3:04 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the
.
-- Mike
From: Phil Hunt [mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:35 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
Should option C read: No OAuth
.
-- Mike
From: Phil Hunt [mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 3:35 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
Should option C read: No OAuth Errors
] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
Extensibility for the new option would be defined within each spec.
It doesn't seem right to put registry in bearer spec. What if one is defining a
non-bearer spec?
Phil
Sent from my phone.
On 2011-03-11, at 15:41, Mike Jones
of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline Friday,
March 18
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth Errors
Registryhttp://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.html#errors-registry
to increase interoperability among implementations using the related OAuth
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote:
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the OAuth
Errors
Registryhttp://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.html#errors-registry
to increase interoperability among implementations using the related
OAuth
-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lucy
Lynch
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote:
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03
!
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lucy
Lynch
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike
I vote (A) because 1) I strongly believe in modularity and 2) I disagree
with D. Hence what applies to all specifications must be defined at the
highest level, rather than in a self-contained specification. So, this
looked like a simple matter to me.
Having said that, I note that Lucy has a
, March 11, 2011 5:41 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Vote: Location of OAuth Errors Registry, deadline
Friday, March 18
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Mike Jones wrote:
As you know, the OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token draft -03 established the
OAuth Errors
Registryhttp
23 matches
Mail list logo
