...@lodderstedt.net]
*Sent:* Friday, August 20, 2010 11:29 AM
*To:* Anthony Nadalin
*Cc:* Chuck Mortimore; Eran Hammer-Lahav; Brian Campbell; oauth
*Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
What data shall the issued token contain? Different identifiers and
also information about the different
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
What data shall the issued token contain? Different identifiers and also
information about the different issuing authorities? Is the new token's data
inherited from the source assertions or are the assertions just verified and
the token data (incl
]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 11:19 AM
To: Chuck Mortimore; Eran Hammer-Lahav; Brian Campbell
Cc: oauth
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
So the UK Government Gateway project is a concrete use case. The use case for
the UK government is that the government has many assertion
, August 12, 2010 10:24 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; Brian Campbell
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
Personally, I'd first like to see more concrete use-cases of how multiple
assertions are going to be used in practice. Tony alluded to some abstract
use-cases, but fuller
Of *Chuck Mortimore
*Sent:* Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:24 AM
*To:* Eran Hammer-Lahav; Brian Campbell
*Cc:* oauth
*Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
Personally, I'd first like to see more concrete use-cases of how
multiple assertions are going to be used in practice. Tony alluded
Mortimore
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:24 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; Brian Campbell
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
Personally, I'd first like to see more concrete use-cases of how multiple
assertions are going to be used in practice. Tony alluded to some abstract
Campbell
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:55 PM
To: David Recordon
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:04 PM, David Recordon record...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that, would you strongly object to these proposals being written
in a separate document
multiple (SAML) assertions also mean multiple subject statements. Are there any
constraints regarding the relations among those subjects (identities)?
regards,
Torsten.
Am 12.08.2010 um 22:01 schrieb Brian Campbell bcampb...@pingidentity.com:
I generally agree more with Chuck, David and
-Original Message-
From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:36 PM
To: Chuck Mortimore
Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; Brian Campbell; oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
I've only been half following the recent assertion threads
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:04 PM, David Recordon record...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that, would you strongly object to these proposals being written
in a separate document than the core spec? The device flow is a good
example of where we're doing this. We really think that it will be
useful, are
:
WFM.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:03 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
To be honest, I somehow overlooked that particular text - my mistake
I generally agree more with Chuck, David and Brain E than I don't.
But I do think that someone will find a pragmatic reason for 1
assertion eventually and I think the proposal earlier in this thread
to allow for multiple occurrences of the assertion parameter in the
core spec will make that
Given that, would you strongly object to these proposals being written
in a separate document than the core spec? The device flow is a good
example of where we're doing this. We really think that it will be
useful, are working on implementations, but it hasn't yet been proven
in production.
On
WFM.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:03 AM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
To be honest, I somehow overlooked that particular text - my mistake
The question of allowing for multiple assertions in the SAML profile
came up recently. See
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04068.html and
several subsequent messages in the thread.
I pushed back on the idea at first due to added complexity. There are
a number of things
09, 2010 12:34 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] more than one assertion?
The question of allowing for multiple assertions in the SAML profile came up
recently. See http://www.ietf.org/mail-
archive/web/oauth/current/msg04068.html and several subsequent
messages in the thread.
I pushed
16 matches
Mail list logo
