Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-30 Thread Sascha Preibisch
+1 On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 23:57, Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote: > > +1 > > Vladimir > > On 15/07/2020 20:54, Dick Hardt wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > wrote: >> >> All, >> >> This is a call for adoption for the following OAuth 2.1 document as a WG >>

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-30 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
All, This concludes our call for adoption for this document. The WG has decided to adopt this draft as a WG document. *Authors,* Feel free to submit a WG version of the document. Regards, Rifaat On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 9:29 AM Nat Sakimura wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:57 PM

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-17 Thread Nat Sakimura
+1 On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:57 PM Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote: > +1 > > Vladimir > On 15/07/2020 20:54, Dick Hardt wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef < > rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is a *call for adoption* for the following *OAuth 2.1*

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-17 Thread Vladimir Dzhuvinov
+1 Vladimir On 15/07/2020 20:54, Dick Hardt wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > mailto:rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > All, > > This is a *call for adoption* for the following *OAuth 2.1* > document as a WG document: >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-16 Thread Dave Tonge
+1 On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 19:43, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a *call for adoption* for the following *OAuth 2.1* document as a > WG document: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-03.html > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *July 29th.* > >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-16 Thread Daniel Fett
+1 Am 15.07.20 um 19:41 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef: > All, > > This is a *call for adoption* for the following *OAuth 2.1* document > as a WG document: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-03.html > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *July 29th.* > > Regards, >  

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-16 Thread Jim Willeke
t; > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:37 PM 40auth0@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> *From:* OAuth *On Behalf Of *Dick Hardt >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2020 10:55 AM >> *To:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef >> *Cc:* oauth >> *Subject:*

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-16 Thread Dominick Baier
15, 2020 10:55 AM > *To:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > *Cc:* oauth > *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef < > rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread vittorio . bertocci=40auth0 . com
+1 From: OAuth On Behalf Of Dick Hardt Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 10:55 AM To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Cc: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document +1 On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef mailto:rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> > wrote

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Sascha Preibisch
+1 On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 13:40, Hans Zandbelt wrote: > > +1 > > Hans. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:43 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > wrote: >> >> All, >> >> This is a call for adoption for the following OAuth 2.1 document as a WG >> document: >>

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Hans Zandbelt
+1 Hans. On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:43 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a *call for adoption* for the following *OAuth 2.1* document as a > WG document: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-03.html > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *July

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Falk Andreas
_ Von: OAuth im Auftrag von Torsten Lodderstedt Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2020 21:40 An: John Bradley Cc: oauth@ietf.org Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document +1 > On 15. Jul 2020, at 21:37, John Bradley wrote: > > I support addoption

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Michael A Peck
+1 I support adoption of this document by the working group. From: OAuth on behalf of Dick Hardt Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 1:56 PM To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" Subject: [EXT] Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document +1 On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 a

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
+1 > On 15. Jul 2020, at 21:37, John Bradley wrote: > > I support addoption > > On 7/15/2020 3:32 PM, Neil Madden wrote: >> I support adoption. >> >>> On 15 Jul 2020, at 18:42, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef >>> wrote: >>> >>>  >>> All, >>> >>> This is a call for adoption for the following OAuth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread John Bradley
I support addoption On 7/15/2020 3:32 PM, Neil Madden wrote: > I support adoption.  > >> On 15 Jul 2020, at 18:42, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef >> wrote: >> >>  >> All, >> >> This is a *call for adoption* for the following *OAuth 2.1* document >> as a WG document: >>

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Neil Madden
I support adoption. > On 15 Jul 2020, at 18:42, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > >  > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the following OAuth 2.1 document as a WG > document: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-03.html > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Warren, Please, start a separate thread for this issue. Regards, Rifaat On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:57 PM Warren Parad wrote: > I only recently joined this WG DL, so maybe this was already discussed by > I have two things I'm confused/curious about: > > 1. Can we avoid using (1, 2, 3) on the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Aaron Parecki
Just to clarify, this thread is a call for adoption, not meant to discuss the details of this particular draft. Any issues with the draft can be raised as new threads. But right now, the question posed to the list is whether the group thinks this document should be adopted as a working group

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Warren Parad
I only recently joined this WG DL, so maybe this was already discussed by I have two things I'm confused/curious about: 1. Can we avoid using (1, 2, 3) on the left side of the diagram to describe, I'm not even sure what they are supposed to represent, not to mention the RO in the diagram doesn't

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - OAuth 2.1 document

2020-07-15 Thread Dick Hardt
+1 On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:42 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is a *call for adoption* for the following *OAuth 2.1* document as a > WG document: > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-03.html > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *July 29th.* > >