On 2013-12-02T10:40:50, Marek Grac wrote:
Hi Marek,
sorry for the long delay. Other work frankly kept me away from this
topic :-( Let's get rolling.
> 4. fence agents (as in RHEL HA) originally followed it too, but as it
> wasn't a good fit/specifics diverged -- that's why some modif
On 2014-01-19T08:13:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> It's already there as https://github.com/ClusterLabs/OCF-spec
I know about that repo, but I was proposing to:
- strip it down to the one remaining spec that actually people care
about,
- strip out the history the github only displays as "invalid
On 2014-01-20T10:38:34, Florian Haas wrote:
> Thanks for looping me in. I have obviously no objections to taking this
> out of the linux-ha.org Mercurial repo and merging it into GitHub.
>
> Just let me know when you've agreed on a structure for that new repo,
> and I'll move that stuff over.
O
On 2014-10-27T21:54:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Because metadata are now used also for generating manual pages or user
> > interfaces, it is important to change metadata appropriately. I propose
> > to add new option with "view=...". Such distinction will help developers
> > of UI as they will
On 2015-02-12T16:26:31, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Hi all,
I trust you will make the right decisions with regard to the OCF RA
spec, and I'm happy to see it revived. (Though, frankly, I'm a bit
flabbergasted that the result of trying to unify stuff was *yet another
bloody mailing list*. ;-)
But plea
On 2016-10-15T10:07:54, Alan Robertson wrote:
A post on the OCF list, a blast from the past ;-) Back in the day,
crowded meeting rooms, arguing about idempotency and return values. Oh
my. Standards, such a lot of work.
I similarly have no opinion on where this should go; at this stage, I
don't t
