On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:27:23 +0300 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
wrote:
We're hold spin_lock(ent-fs_fcheck-fc_lock) so the allocation has
to be GFP_ATOMIC.
I changed the sizeof() because otherwise the line goes over the 80
character limit and also the new way is prefered kernel
Thanks, Andrew. Looks good.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
Hi Andrew and Dan,
Thank for your efforts.
It is better than before.
Thanks a lot.
Gang
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:27:23 +0300 Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
wrote:
We're hold spin_lock(ent-fs_fcheck-fc_lock) so the allocation has
to be GFP_ATOMIC.
I changed the sizeof()
We're hold spin_lock(ent-fs_fcheck-fc_lock) so the allocation has
to be GFP_ATOMIC.
I changed the sizeof() because otherwise the line goes over the 80
character limit and also the new way is prefered kernel style.
Fixes: e467fe5da718 ('ocfs2: sysfile interfaces for online file check')
