Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

HiCédric, Sorry I can't answer your question, but we are trying to. Please be patient. On 2018/1/11 19:52, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Hi Changwei, > > short question : Will the stable release of kernel 4.15 fix this bug ? > Regards > > 2018-01-11 8:06 GMT+01:00 Changwei Ge

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

Hi Cédric, On kernel mainline:) On 2018/1/11 14:50, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Hi Changwei. > My question may be stupid, but... can you tell me where I can find the source > of latest ocfs2 ? > Every google search points to oracle website which refers to 1.6 versions > > 2018-01-11 2:03

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

Hi Changwei. My question may be stupid, but... can you tell me where I can find the source of latest ocfs2 ? Every google search points to oracle website which refers to 1.6 versions 2018-01-11 2:03 GMT+01:00 Changwei Ge : > Hi Cédric, > > These two patches are already

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

Hi Changwei, Can you give me a ref or a link pointing to your patch ? Thanks 2018-01-10 12:57 GMT+01:00 Changwei Ge : > Hi BASSAGET, > > We ocfs2 developers are solving a DIO crash issue which may share the same > root cause with yours. > > You can refer to my patch set of 2

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

Hi Cédric, You'd better paste the core dump stack and the method of reproducing this BUG. thanks, Jun On 2018/1/10 19:48, BASSAGET Cédric wrote: > Hello > Today I reported a bug related to ocfs2 1.8.on proxmox forum, maybe somebody > here will be able to help me... > The bog on proxmox forum :

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel bug

Hi BASSAGET, We ocfs2 developers are solving a DIO crash issue which may share the same root cause with yours. You can refer to my patch set of 2 and backport them into your kernel to see if the issue can be kicked away. ocfs2: make metadata estimation accurate and clear ocfs2: try to

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at ocfs2/alloc.c:1514

Additional stack traces added. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841144 -- Russell Mosemann___ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at ocfs2/alloc.c:1514

IT Manager | Future Foam, Inc. 1610 Avenue N | Council Bluffs, IA 51501-1071 O: (712) 323-9122 Ext 228 F: (712) 323-0158 -Original Message- From: "Gang He" <g...@suse.com> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:11am To: rmosem...@futurefoam.com, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at ocfs2/alloc.c:1514

Hello Russell, I just went through the bug description from the link below, Could you always meet this issue in your testing environment? since it looks like a simple direct write. Second, could you describe the whole reproduce steps in details or provide a testing script which can make this

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

On 2016/4/22 11:17, Gang He wrote: > > > >> Hi Gang, >> >> On 2016/4/21 17:50, Gang He wrote: >>> >>> >>> >> Hi Gang, May be. If so, it seems that it has relations with locks. Can we know which data is newer? >>> Hi Joseph, I do not get your question. >>> About this

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

>>> > Hi Gang, > > On 2016/4/21 17:50, Gang He wrote: >> >> >> > >>> Hi Gang, >>> May be. If so, it seems that it has relations with locks. >>> Can we know which data is newer? >> Hi Joseph, I do not get your question. >> About this bug, the customer only have a panic message, no

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

Hi Gang, On 2016/4/21 17:50, Gang He wrote: > > > >> Hi Gang, >> May be. If so, it seems that it has relations with locks. >> Can we know which data is newer? > Hi Joseph, I do not get your question. > About this bug, the customer only have a panic message, no message/kernel > dump is

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

>>> > Hi Gang, > May be. If so, it seems that it has relations with locks. > Can we know which data is newer? Hi Joseph, I do not get your question. About this bug, the customer only have a panic message, no message/kernel dump is provided. Thanks Gang > > Thanks, > Joseph > > On

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

Hi Gang, May be. If so, it seems that it has relations with locks. Can we know which data is newer? Thanks, Joseph On 2016/4/21 15:59, Gang He wrote: > Hello Guys, > > Sorry for delayed reply, the fsck log was reported from the customer. > OCFS2 volumes to check are: > /dev/dm-11

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

Hello Guys, Sorry for delayed reply, the fsck log was reported from the customer. OCFS2 volumes to check are: /dev/dm-11 83886080 44540260 39345820 54% /sapmnt /dev/dm-14 62914560 15374960 47539600 25% /usr/sap /dev/dm-13

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

Hello Joseph and Junxiao, Unfortunately, there were not any kernel dump/message/fsck report, just happened twice at the customer environment. The customer kept the last log as below, the customer used SLES11SP3 for x86_64 (3.0.x-xx). Thanks Gang >>> > Hi Gang, > I haven't found any related

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

Hi Gang, I haven't found any related information about this BUG. Which kernel version are you using? It seems inode size mismatch between disk and memory, so any further log about these? Thanks, Joseph On 2016/3/31 10:56, Gang He wrote: > Hello Joseph and Junxiao, > > Did you encounter this

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

On 03/31/2016 10:56 AM, Gang He wrote: > Hello Joseph and Junxiao, > > Did you encounter this issue in the past? I doubt this is possible a race > condition bug (rather than data inconsistency). Never saw this. fsck report any corruption? Thanks, Junxiao. > > Thanks > Gang > > >> Hello

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file

Hello Joseph and Junxiao, Did you encounter this issue in the past? I doubt this is possible a race condition bug (rather than data inconsistency). Thanks Gang >>> > Hello Guys, > > I got a bug, which reported a kernel BUG in function ocfs2_truncate_file, > Base on my initial analysis, this

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

HI, Le 30/07/2012 08:30, Joel Becker a écrit : On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:18:30AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote: Hello Get this on first write made ( by deliver sending mail to inform of the restart of services ) Home partition (the one receiving the mail) is based on ocfs2 created from

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

On 01/08/2012 22:43, Vincent ETIENNE wrote: Hi Some further progress on bisection I'm now here git bisect start # bad: [2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c] Merge tag 'irqdomain-for-linus' of git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 git bisect bad 2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

On 30/07/2012 09:53, Joel Becker wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:45:14AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote: Le 30/07/2012 08:30, Joel Becker a écrit : On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:18:30AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote: Hello Get this on first write made ( by deliver sending mail to inform of

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

Hi, So 12 commits left, corresponding to this bisection log git bisect start # bad: [2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c] Merge tag 'irqdomain-for-linus' of git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 git bisect bad 2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c # good:

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

Hi based on current git ( commit 1a9b4993b70fb1884716902774dc9025b457760d ) and reverting commit ea022dfb3c2a4680483b00eb2fecc9fc4f6091d1 commit ea022dfb3c2a4680483b00eb2fecc9fc4f6091d1 Author: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk Date: Thu May 3 10:14:29 2012 -0400 ocfs: simplify symlink

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

Some progress the fallocate bug is not the only bug latest head with the fallocate correction still crash ( in read_blocks ) So i have restart bisection but at each stage i reinject the fallocate patch ( is it a corerct way to do this ?) Bisection is not very fast but for the moment (sometimes

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

Hi Some further progress on bisection I'm now here git bisect start # bad: [2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c] Merge tag 'irqdomain-for-linus' of git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 git bisect bad 2d534926205db9ffce4bbbde67cb9b2cee4b835c # good: [c3b92c8787367a8bb53d57d9789b558f1295cc96]

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

Le 02/08/2012 23:08, Sunil Mushran a écrit : On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Vincent ETIENNE v...@vetienne.net mailto:v...@vetienne.net wrote: Hi based on current git ( commit 1a9b4993b70fb1884716902774dc9025b457760d ) and reverting commit

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

Thanks for your help. On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Vincent ETIENEN v...@vetienne.net wrote: Le 02/08/2012 23:08, Sunil Mushran a écrit : On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Vincent ETIENNE v...@vetienne.net wrote: Hi based on current git ( commit

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Vincent ETIENNE v...@vetienne.net wrote: Hi based on current git ( commit 1a9b4993b70fb1884716902774dc9025b457760d ) and reverting commit ea022dfb3c2a4680483b00eb2fecc9fc4f6091d1 commit ea022dfb3c2a4680483b00eb2fecc9fc4f6091d1 Author: Al Viro

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:18:30AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote: Hello Get this on first write made ( by deliver sending mail to inform of the restart of services ) Home partition (the one receiving the mail) is based on ocfs2 created from drbd block device in primary/primary mode These

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:45:14AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote: HI, Le 30/07/2012 08:30, Joel Becker a écrit : On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:18:30AM +0200, Vincent ETIENNE wrote: Hello Get this on first write made ( by deliver sending mail to inform of the restart of services )

Re: [Ocfs2-devel] kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2886! Linux 3.5.0

The fallocate() oops is probably the same that is fixed by this patch. https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=smushran/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a2118b301104a24381b414bc93371d666fe8d43a Is in the list of patches that are ready to be pushed.