On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Lukas Reichlin
wrote:
> Dear Octave Community
>
> I have a struct "quaternion" with fields w, x, y and z. The fields are
> matrices.
>
> Next I build a cell array "qcell" which contains quaternions.
>
> Now I can access fields with qcell{2}.w
>
> However, qc
I've implemented the Helical and Helical Scan interleavers.
octave-forge/main/comm/inst.
I'm not a member of the octave forge project, so I've just attached
them. Enjoy.
Alternately, someone could grant me commit access. My sourceforge user
is https://sourceforge.net/users/mborg
-- Mark
Dear Octave Community
I have a struct "quaternion" with fields w, x, y and z. The fields are matrices.
Next I build a cell array "qcell" which contains quaternions.
Now I can access fields with qcell{2}.w
However,qcell{:}.w doesn't seem to work.
How can I extract those fields? Thanks
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:03:36PM +0100, Gary wrote:
> The input and return parameters after violation of bounds are in the
> attached file, 21_debug.ods.tar.gz.
I have no program which can read the contained file. Please type, from
the debug prompt after the call to leasqr which led to violation
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:42:04AM -0700, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> tor, 13 05 2010 kl. 23:09 +0200, skrev Alois Schlögl:
> > (i) n(k)+=1; is preferred over n(k)++ for two reasons
> >
> > 1) the former is faster
> > octave:36> N=1e6;
> > octave:37> tic;
Thanks for the suggestions Olaf. I've carried them out. See below for
the results and comments.
On 14 May 2010 10:50, Olaf Till wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:45:55AM +0100, Gary wrote:
>> Hi Olaf,
>>
>> Thanks for responding so quickly. I'm sorry if I didn't make it clear
>> in my previous
Carlo de Falco wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2010, at 23:00, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>
>>> Certainly. But at this event, only Windows machines were available and
>>> Matlab was already pre-installed. I had little options
>>> about the setup. (and i do not want to say it loud, but M is still
>>> faster, [1].
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:45:55AM +0100, Gary wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> Thanks for responding so quickly. I'm sorry if I didn't make it clear
> in my previous message, but the script calls an external program and
> has a lot of code that handles that aspect of the procedure. In this
> script, the bou
Hi Olaf,
Thanks for responding so quickly. I'm sorry if I didn't make it clear
in my previous message, but the script calls an external program and
has a lot of code that handles that aspect of the procedure. In this
script, the bounds are only sometimes violated. Unfortunately, I
cannot supply yo
tor, 13 05 2010 kl. 23:09 +0200, skrev Alois Schlögl:
> Oct2mat has significantly improved. Most notable, support for the
> following language elements as been added:
>
> - support for standalone ++, --,
> - support of +=, -= etc operators,
> - support of [blah](ix), fun(a)(ix)
> - do...un
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2010, at 23:00, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>
>>> Certainly. But at this event, only Windows machines were available
>>> and
>>> Matlab was already pre-installed. I had little options
>>> about the setup. (and i do not want to say it l
On 13 May 2010, at 23:00, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>> Certainly. But at this event, only Windows machines were available
>> and
>> Matlab was already pre-installed. I had little options
>> about the setup. (and i do not want to say it loud, but M is still
>> faster, [1]. Admittingly, Octave has im
Hi
I've been having trouble to install Octave 3.2.4 on a server that runs SuSE
Linux Enterprise Server 9; the Linux kernel version is 2.6.5-7.244-sn2
running on the ia64 chipset. I have past the configure step some on
recommended me using syntax "./configure F77=gfortran" it worked with few
war
13 matches
Mail list logo
