On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Michael Goffioul
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The java package uses the same system, so if it works for java object, it
>>> should
>>> logically also work for COM objects.
>
> Yes, I thought of that too, but:
> (1)
Michael Goffioul wrote:
> Additionally, does it work if you decompose the statement in 2:
>
> wbs = xlapp.Workbooks
> wb = wbs.Open(fname)
octave.exe:2> xlapp = actxserver ('Excel.Application')
xlapp =
octave.exe:3> wbs = xlapp.Workbooks
error: can't perform indexing operations for octave_com_o
Additionally, does it work if you decompose the statement in 2:
wbs = xlapp.Workbooks
wb = wbs.Open(fname)
Michael.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Michael Goffioul
wrote:
> The java package uses the same system, so if it works for java object, it
> should
> logically also work for COM objec
The java package uses the same system, so if it works for java object, it should
logically also work for COM objects. By looking at the code for both, I can't
see any obvious difference. Some debugging might be needed, but I can't
investigate at the moment.
Michael.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:07
On 29 Jun 2011, at 12:21, Olaf Till wrote:
> It occured to me that with your example the returns within the blocks
> weren't supposed to be met at all, but only
>
> Cell retval (rdims);
>
> ...
>
> return octave_value (retval);
>
> in the outer function block. And cell2cell should have not
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:58:55AM +0200, c. wrote:
>
> On 29 Jun 2011, at 11:02, Olaf Till wrote:
>
> > I'd try to clarify first if indeed having a single return point is
> > considered mandatory
>
> It sure isn't mandatory in Octave-Forge where coding guidelines are not as
> strict as in Octa
Hi Michael,
While trying the windows package with Tatsuro Matsuoka's octave-3.4.2
MingW testing binary, I hit an old error:
=
octave.exe:29> xlapp = actxserver ('Excel.Application')
xlapp =
octave.exe:30> wb = xlapp.Workbooks.Open (fname)
error: can't
On 29 Jun 2011, at 10:57, Olaf Till wrote:
>
> But this version was already checked in. You probably didn't update to
> current SVN ...
You are right, although I did update the SVN repository the version I had
installed is the released one.
Updating to the SVN version
demo leasqr
now works
On 29 Jun 2011, at 11:02, Olaf Till wrote:
> I'd try to clarify first if indeed having a single return point is
> considered mandatory
It sure isn't mandatory in Octave-Forge where coding guidelines are not as
strict as in Octave core.
On the other hand I do find it useful when debugging ...
>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:54:11AM +0200, c. wrote:
>
> On 29 Jun 2011, at 09:16, Olaf Till wrote:
>
> > I'm not ready, but:
> >
> > Your example with cell2cell works for me, too:
>
> is your version of cell2cell the same as in the repository?
>
> > octave:5> function prova ()
> >> m = 1; n =
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:53:29AM +0200, c. wrote:
> ...
> Could you please check-in your versio of optim to the SVN?
> the current version of leasqr is totally unusable to me,
> even just
>
> "demo leasqr"
>
> fails and erases the contents of the global workspace
But this version was already
Clay Fulcher wrote:
> Thank you Philip.
>
> Here is the information you asked for:
>
> - Octave version 3.2.4 (built with MinGW compiler) installed with
> Windows Installer
> - Packages that do not install:
> database-1.0.4
> fl-core-1.0.0
> nan-2.4.4
> octproj-1.0.2
> openmpi_ext-1.0.2
> parallel-
On 29 Jun 2011, at 09:16, Olaf Till wrote:
> I'm not ready, but:
>
> Your example with cell2cell works for me, too:
is your version of cell2cell the same as in the repository?
> octave:5> function prova ()
>> m = 1; n = 1;
>> plabels = cell2cell (num2cell ((1:n).'), 1);
>> m
>> endfunction
> o
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply!
On 29 Jun 2011, at 08:59, Olaf Till wrote:
> Please wait a minute.
>
> In SVN some days ago I had already removed any usage of "cell2cell" in
> the optim package, including leasqr (replaced it by num2cell). And
> your example with leasqr works for me.
OK, I will
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:59:16AM +0200, Olaf Till wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06:14AM +0200, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> >
> > On 28 Jun 2011, at 18:06, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am posting this to both Octave and Octave-Forge as I think this
> > > problem encounte
15 matches
Mail list logo
