On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Levente Torok wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Carnë Draug
>> wrote:
>>> On 11 May 2012 12:32, Levente Torok wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, C
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 11 May 2012 12:32, Levente Torok wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Carnë Draug
>> wrote:
>>> On 11 May 2012 07:59, Levente Torok wrote:
I wanted to analyze gmm_exampe.m from econometrics package recently
installed but
2012/4/23 Carnë Draug :
> Hi everybody
>
> I have noticed that for some reason the ann package does not appear on
> the list of octave-forge packages [1] but is on our servers [2]. I
> tried to install the package myself to regenerate the documentation
> but install fails with a bunch of errors and
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Olaf Till wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:40:57PM -0800, muhali wrote:
> > I stumbled upon this issue before, see e.g. here:
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=25650593
> >
> > My question is: Are there any plans to make the optim p
his?
I'm thinking of just putting this on my own page with instructions. If
anyone would like to try it out, I can provide the modified ann_sample.
Michael
# Copyright (C) 2012 Michael Creel
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU
Please keep me on there, I may occasionally have an update of some of the
stuff in the optimization code.
Michael Creel (mcreel)
2012/2/8 Olaf Till
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 03:30:01PM +, Carnë Draug wrote:
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > a few months ago it was discussed t
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Juan Pablo Carbajal
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have posted a function that implements the two possible inverses of
> vech. Does it already exist? I know there is a function that produces
> a matrix that when multiplied by the output of vech returns a
> symmetric matrix (can
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Andrea Bressan
> wrote:
>> I recently upgraded openmpi and octave and found some minor issues using
>> openmpi_ext.
>>
>> Compiling stops in MPI_Probe.cc and MPI_Iprobe.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Andrea Bressan wrote:
> I recently upgraded openmpi and octave and found some minor issues using
> openmpi_ext.
>
> Compiling stops in MPI_Probe.cc and MPI_Iprobe.cc.
> Both files contains the function put_MPI_Stat(const MPI_Status&)
> and in that function there a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Olaf Till wrote:
> Would anyone mind me to make a new release now of optim (Micheal?),
> miscellaneous, and struct?
>
> Olaf
>
Fine with me, I have made no changes to the parts I work on.
Best,
Michael
-
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Olaf Till wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Michael Creel wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Olaf Till
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm about to cleanup some warnings "possible Matlab-style
> > > shor
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Olaf Till wrote:
> I'm about to cleanup some warnings "possible Matlab-style
> short-circuit operator" by new Octave in the optim package. A few of
> them are in bfgsmin.m. Micheal, may I clean these up, too?
>
> Olaf
>
Hi Olaf,
Sure, please do. Just please chec
Sounds good to me. Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Olaf Till wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to make a new release of the optim package. It now
> depends on newest versions of packages struct and miscellaneous, so
> they'd need to be newly released, too.
>
> Would someone disagree
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> ons, 16 06 2010 kl. 19:15 -0400, skrev Alex Lancaster:
> > I'm the maintainer for the Fedora package of octave-forge
>
> Thanks for doing that :-)
>
> > I have definitely tracked this down to "ann" being the issue,
> > removing the package,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Olaf Till wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a function 'optim_problems' has been submitted to the optim package,
> returning test problems for optimization. As yet it's a skeleton with
> a few examples for curve fitting.
>
> I think there is a need for such a repository of tests for
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Alois Schlögl
wrote:
> Michael Creel wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Alois Schlögl
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Søren Hauberg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Cre
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Alois Schlögl wrote:
> Søren Hauberg wrote:
>>
>> lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
>>>
>>> I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pretty
>>> straightforward. I did that for samin and bfgs
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> man, 22 03 2010 kl. 10:21 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
>
> > Besides this, I also added checks for ensuring that the
> > function
> > actually returns 'double's.
> >
> >
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Michael Creel
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jaroslav Hajek
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Michael Creel
&g
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Michael Creel
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Søren Hauberg
> wrote:
> >>
> >> One problem with the current approach is that you c
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
>
> One problem with the current approach is that you currently can't use
> function handles with 'bfgs'. In some situations they are more simply to
> use than strings.
>
> I don't think you'll see any noticeable difference in terms of speed.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> søn, 21 03 2010 kl. 09:32 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
>
>
> > I am interested in knowing what problem you found with numhessian.
>
> The main problem was the following line
>
> f_args(k); // resize only once
&
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
> > I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pretty
> > straightforward. I did that for samin and bfgsmin quite a while ago,
> > when lists were deprecate
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> fre, 12 03 2010 kl. 10:13 +0100, skrev Olaf Till:
> > To your original question, I'd now think that just the necessary
> > change should be made (your suggestion of disallowing extra arguments
> > since we have anonymous functions seems fine
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>
> On 18 Mar 2010, at 10:35, Michael Creel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>> Is it possible for a package to have subdirectories within the
>> package/inst directory? Would .m files in subdirectories be found
>> auto
Hi all,
Is it possible for a package to have subdirectories within the package/inst
directory? Would .m files in subdirectories be found automatically? The
reason I ask is because I would like to expand the econometrics package to
include some new thing, but I would like to avoid mixing files toget
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Benjamin Lindner
> wrote:
> > Benjamin Lindner wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> trying to install the optim-1.0.10 package with octave 3.2.4 on mingw32
> >> fai
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Benjamin Lindner wrote:
> Benjamin Lindner wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> trying to install the optim-1.0.10 package with octave 3.2.4 on mingw32
>> fails with the error message
>>
>> __bfgsmin.cc:242: error: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope
>>
>> I need to also #inc
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Olaf Till wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are non-function scripts with demos and tests in package
> optim. These can not be correctly handled by Octaves help system and
> produce weird texts in the auto-generated html-help. It has been
> suggested to convert these scripts
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Riccardo Corradini <
riccardocorrad...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have just committed new versions of MPI_Send and MPI_Recv using template
> specializations to avoid repetitions of code.
> Enjoy
> Bests regards
> Riccardo Corradini
>
>
>
>
A release would be great. My stuff is ready to go in svn.
Cheers, M.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Olaf Till wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since the optim package has no single maintainer, I would like to make
> a release to make current leasqr.m available.
>
> Is that o.k.?
>
lonia
> Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia
> Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss 7 (formerly, Av. Canal Olímpic SN)
> 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona)
> Tel.: +34 93 645 29 26
> Fax. +34 93 645 29 01eduardo.d...@cttc.eshttp://www.cttc.es
>
>
>
> Michael Creel escribió:
>
> Hi all,
>
AHA! Changing the first line of Makefile in svn to
MPICC := mpiCC
seems to have the desired effect. I'll check it in, and could you please see
if it works then, Eduardo?
M.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Riccardo Corradini <
riccardocorrad...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> Please Eduardo,
> have a look
> .r6543
>
> all: MPI_Init.oct \
> MPI_Initialized.oct \
> MPI_Comm_rank.oct \
> MPI_Comm_size.oct \
> MPI_Finalize.oct \
> MPI_Finalized.oct \
> MPI_Send.oct \
> MPI_Recv.oct \
> MPI_Iprobe.oct \
> MPI_Probe.oct \
> MPI_Barrier.oct \
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Carlo de Falco
wrote:
>
> On 10 Feb 2010, at 21:00, Michael Creel wrote:
>
>> True. I put the functions where they are back in the days when o-f was
>> a monolithic package, so everything got released all at once. I'm
>> conc
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Weber
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:27:24AM +0100, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Thomas Weber
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:12:10AM +0100, Michael Creel wrote:
>> >> Hello al
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Thomas Weber
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:12:10AM +0100, Michael Creel wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> Would there be objection to my moving samin and bfgsmin from optim to
>> econometrics? It's not the natural location, but econometri
Hello all,
Would there be objection to my moving samin and bfgsmin from optim to
econometrics? It's not the natural location, but econometrics depends
on those two functions, and moving them will allow me to make releases
of econometrics independently when releases of optim are made.
Cheers, Michae
Hi all,
I checked in a modified Makefile that reads the configuration using mpicc
-showme. This should allow compilation regardless of where OpenMPI is
installed. The only important thing is that the mpicc found in the path
should point to mpicc as supplied by Open MPI.
Cheers, Michael
On Tue, Feb
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:23 AM, george216 wrote:
>
> Dear professor Michael Creel,
> the other time you advised me to use the functions mle _estimate and
> mle_example in order to calculate the standard deviations and given my large
> number of parameters to estimate, do thes
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 1:01 AM, george brida wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I would like to know the average duration of convergence of the function
> "bfgsmin" to final estimates. I have a model that has 32 parameters to
> estimate ( my problem is a nonlinear regression one). I made four functions
>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:37 PM, george brida wrote:
> Hi the Octavers,
> I remarked that the Octave's function 'bfgsmin' doesn't contain in its
> output argument the Jacobian matrix. This matrix is interesting in nonlinear
> regression because it provides us with the standard errors of the estim
Hi Riccardo and list,
I have released a new version of the PelicanHPC live CD, which
contains the new Open MPI binding functions for Octave, along with
some example code for kernel smoothing and Monte Carlo. More info at
http://pareto.uab.es/mcreel/PelicanHPC/ The new bindings seem to
scale really
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Bruce Axtens wrote:
>
>> I'm getting a weird answer from meandev as compared to Excel, Wolfram Alpha
>> and Protium.
>>
>> GNU Octave, version 3.2.3
>> Octave was configured for "i686-pc-mingw32"
>>
>> meandev([8,
I just re-ran an extensive Monte Carlo involving a lot of
minimization, kernel regression, mixed oct and .m files, using the new
MPI extensions, and Octave 3.2.3. On 4 machines with 32 cores, it took
6.9 hours. The same code using Octave 3.0.x and MPITB on the same
hardware took 15.6 hours. I belie
Sorry, the result is the same.
Michael
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Riccardo Corradini <
riccardocorrad...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> I've uploaded a small change on all cc files
> Please let me know if it improves.
> Bests
> Riccardo
>
> --- *Mer 2/12/09, Michael
n.
> I tested it with the new function MPI_Comm_Load. All the examples with
> montercarlo work as well.
> Bests
> Riccardo
>
>
>
> --- *Mar 1/12/09, Michael Creel * ha scritto:
>
>
> Da: Michael Creel
> Oggetto: Re: [OctDev] A simple C++ example of a class with MPI_Comunic
that needs probably a destructor.
> C++ is not my field too, but on the other hand I am learning a lot from my
> mistakes.
> Thanks a lot
> Riccardo
> --- *Dom 29/11/09, Michael Creel * ha scritto:
>
>
> Da: Michael Creel
> Oggetto: Re: example octave_comm_test updated
>
explanations in the package on configure
> options) I had no problems with all the examples.
> http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/v1.3/downloads/openmpi-1.3.3.tar.bz2
> I will tell you more about my configuration when I will be back in my office
> on Monday.
> Bests
> Ric
ts
> Riccardo
>
> --- *Ven 27/11/09, Michael Creel * ha scritto:
>
>
> Da: Michael Creel
> Oggetto: Re: example octave_comm_test updated
> A: "Riccardo Corradini"
> Cc: "Jaroslav Hajek" , "octave-forge list" <
> octave-dev@lists.s
> --- *Gio 26/11/09, Michael Creel * ha scritto:
>
>
> Da: Michael Creel
> Oggetto: Re: example octave_comm_test updated
> A: "Riccardo Corradini"
> Cc: "Jaroslav Hajek" , "octave-forge list" <
> octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net>
>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Riccardo Corradini <
riccardocorrad...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have updated the example octave_comm_test.cc ( I have just inserted a
> check on the input).
> Let me know what you think.
> Bests
> Riccardo
>
>
I haven't be able to get things to compile with
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
>
> Hi Riccardo and Michael,
>
> I have already implemented basic support for the communicators in the SVN
> tree.
> The relevant functions now accept comm as their last argument, defaulting
> to MPI_COMM_WORLD if not provided.
> MPI_COMM_W
nking on passing a simple string as
> alternative comunicator and if nothing is provided by the user then
> MPI_COMM_WORLD is the default value.
> Thanks and bests
> Riccardo
>
> --- *Sab 21/11/09, Michael Creel * ha scritto:
>
>
> Da: Michael Creel
> Oggetto: Monte C
Hi all,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> I have a few more comments/questions regarding the MPI package.
>
> 1. Will just OpenMPI be targeted or shall we adhere to the MPI standard to
> support various implementations?
> For instance, the latest probe functio
Hello all,
Attached are two files, montecarlo.m and mc_example.m that implement
parallel Monte Carlo simulation of a user defined function. The function
just needs to return a row vector, and montecarlo.m will stack the
replications into a matrix. This implementation is basic and illustrative.
At
h
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Mi
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Jaroslav Hajek
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:44
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Michael Creel
wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In another message, Jaroslav made the comment
>>
>>> 1. info is the first output argument in all functions. I t
Hi all,
In another message, Jaroslav made the comment
1. info is the first output argument in all functions. I think it should be
> the second one, so that it can be easily ignored if wanted.
> In particular, the check in examples
>
> if not(MPI_Initialized)
>info = MPI_Init();
> end
>
> make
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> any updates? Want to try some debugging patches?
>
> --
> RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> computing expert & GNU Octave developer
> Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> Prague, Czech Republic
> url: www.highegg.matf
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Michael Creel
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, O
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Michael Creel
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, O
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Michael Creel
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, O
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Michael Creel
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, O
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Michael Creel
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, O
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Michael Creel wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>>
>>> parcellfun works like cellfun, so this usage is incorrect. see help
>>> for c
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
> parcellfun works like cellfun, so this usage is incorrect. see help
> for cellfun.
> Also, for questions that concern exclusively OctaveForge functions,
> please use the OctaveForge mailing list.
>
> octave:1> a = parcellfun (2, @sin, {1,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Christian Fischer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm currently working an a global optimisation function using
> Differential Evolution. It is based on the Matlab function on this
> page: http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~st
69 matches
Mail list logo
