Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread c.
On 7 Sep 2012, at 14:18, Claudio Freire wrote: > I thought of that, but that would be similar to > > return octave_value_list(); > > Whereas in MPI_Probe.cc:105, theres another print_usage that returns > octave_value(-1). > > I thought it should return the same thing in both cases where it > p

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread Claudio Freire
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:50 AM, c. wrote: > === > --- MPI_Probe.cc(revision 10967) > +++ MPI_Probe.cc(working copy) > @@ -101,11 +101,8 @@ >print_usage (); >results = octave_value (-1); >

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread Claudio Freire
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:38 AM, c. wrote: >> openmpi_ext fails to build with openmpi 1.5, since it uses an >> undocumented, private field (_count) of the MPI_Status structure that >> was renamed (to _ucount). It's still uncommitted, I had sent a patch >> earlier. Just a reminder. > > It seems your

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread c.
On 7 Sep 2012, at 06:58, Claudio Freire wrote: > Regarding this patch, it seems there's a missing return > that makes > newer gcc complain about garbage being returned - there's a patch for > that attached. Thanks for reporting this. It seems the bug was not a missing return but rather a misplac

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-07 Thread c.
On 7 Sep 2012, at 06:58, Claudio Freire wrote: > openmpi_ext fails to build with openmpi 1.5, since it uses an > undocumented, private field (_count) of the MPI_Status structure that > was renamed (to _ucount). It's still uncommitted, I had sent a patch > earlier. Just a reminder. It seems your

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-09-06 Thread Claudio Freire
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:48 PM, c. wrote: >>> I went through the code and did a little cleanup, fixed some trivial bugs >>> and removed >>> a lot of code duplication making use of templates and macros where possible. >>> >>> Does anyone object if I apply the attached patch and prepare a new rel

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-31 Thread Sébastien Villemot
"c." writes: > On 31 Aug 2012, at 10:00, Sébastien Villemot wrote: >> Note that the next release of Ubuntu will also include openmpi_ext >> 1.0.2, since I recently added it into Debian. > > Is there still time to update openmpi_ext in debian so that the next ubuntu > release will include the cu

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-31 Thread c.
On 31 Aug 2012, at 10:00, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Sukanta Basu writes: > The next release of Ubuntu will happen in October and will include 3.6.2. I will probably wait for this release. > > Note that the next release of Ubuntu will also include openmpi_ext > 1.0.2, since I recent

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-31 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Sukanta Basu writes: >>> The next release of Ubuntu will happen in October and will include >>> 3.6.2. I will probably wait for this release. Note that the next release of Ubuntu will also include openmpi_ext 1.0.2, since I recently added it into Debian. -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-30 Thread c.
On 30 Aug 2012, at 19:04, Sukanta Basu wrote: > If I use "ver", openmpi_ext shows up without a "*" next to it. I > believe that signals improper installation. No, it means the package has not been loaded yet. The default setting for most packages has been recently changed to Autoload: no Th

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-30 Thread Carnë Draug
On 30 August 2012 18:04, Sukanta Basu wrote: > Hi Carlo, > > [snip] > > If I use "ver", openmpi_ext shows up without a "*" next to it. I > believe that signals improper installation. No. It means it's no loaded. Run "pkg load openmpi_ext". Packages need to be loaded for use. This is a feature, se

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-30 Thread Sukanta Basu
Carlo, If I repeat the same exercise with 1.0.2, I get the following results. Best regards, Sukanta octave:8> pkg install -verbose openmpi_ext-1.0.2.tar.gz mkdir (/tmp/oct-yuizPX) untar (openmpi_ext-1.0.2.tar.gz, /tmp/oct-yuizPX) make: Entering directory `/tmp/oct-yuizPX/openmpi_ext/src' mkoctfi

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-30 Thread Sukanta Basu
Hi Carlo, Here is the output: octave:5> pkg install -verbose openmpi_ext-1.1.0.tar.gz mkdir (/tmp/oct-8OOYmQ) untar (openmpi_ext-1.1.0.tar.gz, /tmp/oct-8OOYmQ) make: Entering directory `/tmp/oct-8OOYmQ/openmpi_ext/src' mkoctfile -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include/openmpi -lpthr

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-30 Thread c.
Hi, please keep the list in CC as others may find this discussion useful On 30 Aug 2012, at 18:45, Sukanta Basu wrote: > Hi Carlo, > > I tried to install the new openmpi_ext version. thanks for trying it! > However, it won't compile properly on Octave 3.2.4. I did not knowingly introduce anythi

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext 1.1.0

2012-08-29 Thread c.
On 29 Aug 2012, at 21:50, Sukanta Basu wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sukanta Basu wrote: >> Thanks! >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:30 PM, c. wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> A new release of openmpi_ext has just been uploaded to the release tracker. >>> This release is mainly a maintaina

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-08-21 Thread c.
On 21 Aug 2012, at 05:01, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 14 August 2012 17:40, c. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems from a few recent posts on the list that openmpi_ext is getting some >> attention lately, so I decided to have a look at its current status. >> >> It seems that although it received very lit

Re: [OctDev] openmpi_ext

2012-08-20 Thread Carnë Draug
On 14 August 2012 17:40, c. wrote: > Hi, > > It seems from a few recent posts on the list that openmpi_ext is getting some > attention lately, so I decided to have a look at its current status. > > It seems that although it received very little maintainace in the last three > years > it is still