On 21 Jan 2012, at 18:49, Marco Merlin wrote:
> Hi Carlo,
> commit done!
> I hope I did not do any stupid mistake.
> Let me know.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
Marco, looks OK, I added some docs and prepared a package relese.
c.
--
Hi Carlo,
commit done!
I hope I did not do any stupid mistake.
Let me know.
Regards,
Marco
2012/1/13 c. :
>
> On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:13, Marco Merlin wrote:
>
>> I see, but... I had tested against
>> ocs-0.1.1
>> that i got from here:
>> http://octave.sourceforge.net/ocs/index.html
>
> in the docu
On 18 January 2012 17:34, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:25, c. wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:13, Marco Merlin wrote:
>>
>>> I see, but... I had tested against
>>> ocs-0.1.1
>>> that i got from here:
>>> http://octave.sourceforge.net/ocs/index.html
>>
>> in the documentation
On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:25, c. wrote:
>
> On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:13, Marco Merlin wrote:
>
>> I see, but... I had tested against
>> ocs-0.1.1
>> that i got from here:
>> http://octave.sourceforge.net/ocs/index.html
>
> in the documentation of that package I see:
> http://octave.sourceforge.net/oc
Hi Carlo,
I believe it is more appropriate to include it within ocs! Actually i
have neve understood why you initially suggested me to make a separate
package...
What you mean with glitches in the demos?
Cheers,
Marco
2012/1/12 c. :
>
> On 12 Jan 2012, at 09:18, Marco Merlin wrote:
>
>> Hi every
I see, but... I had tested against
ocs-0.1.1
that i got from here:
http://octave.sourceforge.net/ocs/index.html
which obviously is not the same you are using... where shoud i get the
"right" code from (just to be aware in future)?
Should I do anything else?
MM
2012/1/13 c. :
>
> On 13 Jan 2012,
On 13 Jan 2012, at 09:13, Marco Merlin wrote:
> I see, but... I had tested against
> ocs-0.1.1
> that i got from here:
> http://octave.sourceforge.net/ocs/index.html
in the documentation of that package I see:
http://octave.sourceforge.net/ocs/overview.html
utl_plot_by_name
Select by name some
On 13 Jan 2012, at 08:53, Marco Merlin wrote:
> Hi Carlo,
> I believe it is more appropriate to include it within ocs! Actually i
> have neve understood why you initially suggested me to make a separate
> package...
it was so long ago that I don't remember myself ;)
> What you mean with glitches
On 12 Jan 2012, at 09:18, Marco Merlin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I have written a small package, that I would like to make available on
> the octave forge repository. It is a parser meant to be used with the
> already existent package ocs (octave circuit simulator), to allow for
> use a spice-like
