On 29 Jun 2011, at 12:21, Olaf Till wrote:
> It occured to me that with your example the returns within the blocks
> weren't supposed to be met at all, but only
>
> Cell retval (rdims);
>
> ...
>
> return octave_value (retval);
>
> in the outer function block. And cell2cell should have not
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:58:55AM +0200, c. wrote:
>
> On 29 Jun 2011, at 11:02, Olaf Till wrote:
>
> > I'd try to clarify first if indeed having a single return point is
> > considered mandatory
>
> It sure isn't mandatory in Octave-Forge where coding guidelines are not as
> strict as in Octa
On 29 Jun 2011, at 10:57, Olaf Till wrote:
>
> But this version was already checked in. You probably didn't update to
> current SVN ...
You are right, although I did update the SVN repository the version I had
installed is the released one.
Updating to the SVN version
demo leasqr
now works
On 29 Jun 2011, at 11:02, Olaf Till wrote:
> I'd try to clarify first if indeed having a single return point is
> considered mandatory
It sure isn't mandatory in Octave-Forge where coding guidelines are not as
strict as in Octave core.
On the other hand I do find it useful when debugging ...
>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:54:11AM +0200, c. wrote:
>
> On 29 Jun 2011, at 09:16, Olaf Till wrote:
>
> > I'm not ready, but:
> >
> > Your example with cell2cell works for me, too:
>
> is your version of cell2cell the same as in the repository?
>
> > octave:5> function prova ()
> >> m = 1; n =
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:53:29AM +0200, c. wrote:
> ...
> Could you please check-in your versio of optim to the SVN?
> the current version of leasqr is totally unusable to me,
> even just
>
> "demo leasqr"
>
> fails and erases the contents of the global workspace
But this version was already
On 29 Jun 2011, at 09:16, Olaf Till wrote:
> I'm not ready, but:
>
> Your example with cell2cell works for me, too:
is your version of cell2cell the same as in the repository?
> octave:5> function prova ()
>> m = 1; n = 1;
>> plabels = cell2cell (num2cell ((1:n).'), 1);
>> m
>> endfunction
> o
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply!
On 29 Jun 2011, at 08:59, Olaf Till wrote:
> Please wait a minute.
>
> In SVN some days ago I had already removed any usage of "cell2cell" in
> the optim package, including leasqr (replaced it by num2cell). And
> your example with leasqr works for me.
OK, I will
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:59:16AM +0200, Olaf Till wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06:14AM +0200, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> >
> > On 28 Jun 2011, at 18:06, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am posting this to both Octave and Octave-Forge as I think this
> > > problem encounte
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06:14AM +0200, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>
> On 28 Jun 2011, at 18:06, Carlo de Falco wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am posting this to both Octave and Octave-Forge as I think this
> > problem encountered while running a function from the 'optim' package
> > actually exposes
On 28 Jun 2011, at 18:06, Carlo de Falco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am posting this to both Octave and Octave-Forge as I think this
> problem encountered while running a function from the 'optim' package
> actually exposes some bug in Octave itself.
> If others can confirm this behaviour 'll try to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
