Greetings - I have nothing for today's agenda. Should we meet anyway, or
cancel for today? One possible topic is the need for a F-2-F meeting in
Monterey, but that can be handled by email.
Opinions?
-Paul
From: ofiwg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ofiwg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] O
I would like to discuss the utility library/provider framework that is being
added to libfabric.
___
ofiwg mailing list
ofiwg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
Okay, then let's plan to meet as scheduled.
Agenda
- short update on OFIWG sessions at the Workshop
- F-2-F meeting in Monterey in April - yes or no?
- utility/provider framework
-Original Message-
From: Hefty, Sean [mailto:sean.he...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 8:40 AM
T
Do you like libfabrics? Do you like to help people? Do you need more email?
Then the libfabrics-users email list is for you!
This is a reminder (at least I hope it's a reminder), that there is a user
focused email list for libfabrics. You can sign up for the mailing list here:
http://lists.
I want to provide an intra-node communication (i.e. loopback) utility to
libfabric. The loopback utility could be part of a stand-alone provider, or
incorporated into other providers. For this, I'm looking at selecting a
single, easily maintained implementation. These are my choices so far:
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>
> I want to provide an intra-node communication (i.e. loopback) utility to
> libfabric. The loopback utility could be part of a stand-alone provider, or
> incorporated into other providers. For this, I'm looking at selecting a
> single, easi
