On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:17:06PM +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Hi,
2009/11/20 morp...@gravedo.de:
The Problem why we do this is the following: As I and some other people
find out,
there is no support on the data channel (the one you use in oFono to speak
plain AT with the modem)
Hi Morphis,
I saw you added some time ago support for the Palm Pre MSM Modem. I am
working
on the FSO (http://www.freesmartphone.org/) side to support this kind of
MSM
modem as well. I am are currently stucked with the binary protocol spoken
between modem and userland in
Hi Morphis,
I saw you added some time ago support for the Palm Pre MSM Modem. I am
working
on the FSO (http://www.freesmartphone.org/) side to support this kind
of
MSM
modem as well. I am are currently stucked with the binary protocol
spoken
between
2009/11/21 morp...@gravedo.de:
I am currently working on the implementation of
the basics I found out about the protocol. I split the whole code into
two projects: msmcommd and libmsmcomm. msmcommd is a daemon which does
all the link layer protocol handling which is required to speak probably
Hi Niko,
As of that I'm able to imagine only few reasons to use ofono instead of fso.
Then either you're not thinking hard enough or do not have enough domain
experience to really comment. One example: carrier certification. Please
examine what oFono APIs cover and what FSO GSM APIs cover.
