On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 10:02:18AM -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> > Yeah ok - what name do you suggest?
>
> So there's a few things you can do actually:
> - We do have g_at_result_next_unquoted_string. You could try using that to
> obtain the negative and then just sscanf/strtol or whatever to
>
Hi Alex,
Yeah I think you are right and I am getting really irritated with them giving me
the run-around tbh.
I sympathize, been there ;)
Yeah ok - what name do you suggest?
So there's a few things you can do actually:
- We do have g_at_result_next_unquoted_string. You could try using
On 06/08/2021 15:44, Denis Kenzior wrote:
Hi Alex,
OK - they say it's fine and you say it's not. I don't have the time
to be the middle-man here.
I'm fairly certain your vendor's firmware is not following the
relevant standards, but it sounds like they don't want to fix it. What
can I
Hi Alex,
OK - they say it's fine and you say it's not. I don't have the time to be the
middle-man here.
I'm fairly certain your vendor's firmware is not following the relevant
standards, but it sounds like they don't want to fix it. What can I do? :)
Although I'd like to, clearly I
On 06/08/2021 15:20, Denis Kenzior wrote:
Hi Alex,
Denis - I am being directed to the ITU 36.133 spec here
https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=2420
Sure, same document/section where 27.007 refers to for . But
unfortunately
Hi Alex,
Denis - I am being directed to the ITU 36.133 spec here
https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=2420
Sure, same document/section where 27.007 refers to for . But
unfortunately 27.007 only defines the range 0..97 where 0 is
On 03/08/2021 15:28, Denis Kenzior wrote:
Hi Alex,
I have been chasing this up with Quectel and they tell me this the
correct implementation.
"QCOPS and QENG command show the RSSI、RSRP and SINR value of the
network, this is in accordance with the 3GPP TS regulations, so it is
normal for
On 03/08/2021 15:28, Denis Kenzior wrote:
Hi Alex,
I have been chasing this up with Quectel and they tell me this the
correct implementation.
"QCOPS and QENG command show the RSSI、RSRP and SINR value of the
network, this is in accordance with the 3GPP TS regulations, so it is
normal for
Hi Alex,
I have been chasing this up with Quectel and they tell me this the correct
implementation.
"QCOPS and QENG command show the RSSI、RSRP and SINR value of the network, this
is in accordance with the 3GPP TS regulations, so it is normal for negative
numbers to be displayed.image"
So
On 27/07/2021 15:38, Denis Kenzior wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 7/20/21 11:11 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
Hi all,
I'm doing a bit of work with Ofono again, extending support for a
Quectel EG91 - handling additional cell strength information which
seems necessary for LTE.
I'm using Quectel's AT+QCOPS
Hi Sebastian,
Please see below:
On 27/07/2021 15:38, Denis Kenzior wrote:
Hi Alex,
On 7/20/21 11:11 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
Hi all,
I'm doing a bit of work with Ofono again, extending support for a
Quectel EG91 - handling additional cell strength information which
seems necessary for
Hi Alex,
On 7/20/21 11:11 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote:
Hi all,
I'm doing a bit of work with Ofono again, extending support for a Quectel EG91 -
handling additional cell strength information which seems necessary for LTE.
I'm using Quectel's AT+QCOPS which is returning some negative signal
12 matches
Mail list logo
