Re: [oi-dev] pkglint fails during publish

2020-05-09 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 5/9/20 1:03 PM, Gary Mills wrote: On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 03:03:57PM +, Andy Fiddaman wrote: On Sat, 9 May 2020, Gary Mills wrote: ; That's the change that caused the problem. The first line becomes ; only a comment when the file is interpreted by python. Removing that ; option string

Re: [oi-dev] pkglint fails during publish

2020-05-09 Thread Gary Mills
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 03:03:57PM +, Andy Fiddaman wrote: > On Sat, 9 May 2020, Gary Mills wrote: > > ; That's the change that caused the problem. The first line becomes > ; only a comment when the file is interpreted by python. Removing that > ; option string would solve the problem in a

Re: [oi-dev] pkglint fails during publish

2020-05-09 Thread Andy Fiddaman
On Sat, 9 May 2020, Gary Mills wrote: ; That's the change that caused the problem. The first line becomes ; only a comment when the file is interpreted by python. Removing that ; option string would solve the problem in a simpler way. I wonder why ; it was ever put there? I see that it was

Re: [oi-dev] pkglint fails during publish

2020-05-09 Thread Gary Mills
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 06:48:34AM +, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: >Likely by default it passed -Es to the python interpreter, so doesn't >load modules from non-standart path. Ah, I didn't notice that the first line of /usr/bin/pkglint is now: #!/usr/bin/python3.5 -Es The previous

Re: [oi-dev] pkglint fails during publish

2020-05-09 Thread Alexander Pyhalov via oi-dev
Likely by default it passed -Es to the python interpreter, so doesn't load modules from non-standart path. С уважением, Александр Пыхалов, программист отдела телекоммуникационной инфраструктуры управления информационно-коммуникационной инфраструктуры ЮФУ От: