Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
Hi Joerg and all,
thank you for your friendly messages.
Yes, everything started at first with SchilliX. Even BeleniX at its
very beginning, the father of Indiana, which was then simply cloned
I in fact made a project proposal to Sun years before they
ken mays via oi-dev oi-dev@openindiana.org wrote:
As for Martin, he did provide source for his initial releases and was going
to make the latest patches available.
He pretty much told others what he was doing to solve various issues and even
where he was picking up some ideas and code.
Hi Joerg,
Then, the solution is easy. People should offer him 'payable work' before
asking for HIS contributions.
Martin asked for donations for his contribution - people have the freedom not
to pay him as well as not use his work.
We pay bills to get provided services - but no payment means
Wow :)
Thank you Ken, of course you are always welcome for an official seat
or whatever.
And you are the only one of all of them closer related to OI who knows
X11 and DRI/DRM.
Well, let's keep OI where they are.
I'm willing to share and to collaborate, but only with fair players,
and hence:
On 18/09/2014 11:12, Joerg Schilling wrote:
...
I believe, we should rather encourage Oracle to share their code again
following the CDDL.
Just to note, part of the code is indeed still published, see:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/userland/downloads/, which has a
s12-57 just published yesterday
Joerg said: I believe, we should rather encourage Oracle to share their code
again following the CDDL.
On Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:13 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Nikola M. minik...@gmail.com wrote:
Or the difference exist because I think CDDL
On 09/18/14 03:58 PM, ken mays via oi-dev wrote:
Or the difference exist because I think CDDL forces treating files that
change previous code as patches and you maybe say, that treating files
that change existing code as patches is - optional?
If you add code in new files, it is fully
On 09/15/14 02:33 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Nikola M. minik...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/14/14 07:02 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Furthermore it is nonsense what you write about the CDDL terms. The
CDDL permits the developer to keep the src closed, similar to the Xorg
license.
I would say it is
Nikola M. minik...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not correct: The CDDL is file based and you are allowed to add new
files that you may keep secret. You however need to publish everything you
modified and that was under CDDL.
Yeah, but if those file(s) that one adds to CDDL code are - Patches to
On 09/15/14 08:47 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
And now: Peace and happiness.
From now on: UNSUBSCRIBED again.
Thanks again to my friends :)
This is really most annoying.
But consistent in being annoying, if that is for some credit.
___
oi-dev
)
And now: Peace and happiness.
From now on: UNSUBSCRIBED again.
Thanks again to my friends :)
%martin
East-Berlin
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
http://openindiana.org/pipermail/oi-dev/2014-September/003355.html
[oi-dev] OpenSXCE It is illegal
Nikola M. minik...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/14/14 07:02 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Furthermore it is nonsense what you write about the CDDL terms. The
CDDL permits the developer to keep the src closed, similar to the Xorg
license.
I would say it is nonsense what you just said. Re-reading
12 matches
Mail list logo
