Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/17/16 08:54 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: On 05/16/16 11:28 PM, Nikola M wrote: On 05/17/16 05:46 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: In regards to the PDL, to whom does one submit a signed contributor agreement? To Openindiana and illumos surely. Neither OI nor illumos have any legal entity to

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/16/16 11:28 PM, Nikola M wrote: On 05/17/16 05:46 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: In regards to the PDL, to whom does one submit a signed contributor agreement? To Openindiana and illumos surely. Neither OI nor illumos have any legal entity to assign copyright to - no foundations or

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/17/16 01:25 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: Other general note. If we have to use some documentation tools to write OI documentation, they should be available in OI repository. Perhaps it's not true for IDEs, but basic tools should be there. In the case of this website, there really aren't

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/17/16 01:25 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: more useful. Just so you know, it's been my intention all along to start pulling in reusable content from the Wiki, etc. On the contrary, ways for reviewing your writings are that are included in Wiki after revision. Wiki is here to stay for a

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/17/16 04:19 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: On 05/16/2016 04:33 AM, Jim Klimov wrote: In your defense, perhaps it makes sense to mark Michael's pages visibly as a draft/experiment/poc/etc. of a possible future of OI docs and not the official resource at this moment, so readers of the preview

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/17/16 05:46 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: On 05/16/2016 02:43 AM, Nikola M wrote: Posting any "guides" and "roles" inside Openindiana without consultation of others and wider audience is simply arrogant and destructive to Openindiana and that represents TROLLING of Openindiana. Anyone

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/16/2016 02:43 AM, Nikola M wrote: Posting any "guides" and "roles" inside Openindiana without consultation of others and wider audience is simply arrogant and destructive to Openindiana and that represents TROLLING of Openindiana. Anyone wanting to make OI a prison for "roles" and

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/16/2016 06:58, Michael Kruger wrote: Hello All, Reporting my progress so nobody gets the idea this little technology demonstration project has been abandoned. Far from it, there has been continued development. See it all here: http://makruger.github.io/website/ Some notes:

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/16/16 11:27 AM, Nikola M wrote: On 05/16/16 09:43 AM, Adam Števko wrote: STOP calling your private site "Openindiana docs" they are not , simply because you just wrote something on your site and you just say so. Working on things alone and then coming up with aspiration to turn around

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/16/16 09:43 AM, Adam Števko wrote: STOP calling your private site "Openindiana docs" they are not , simply because you just wrote something on your site and you just say so. Working on things alone and then coming up with aspiration to turn around everything is not friendly behavior to

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

+1 > On 16 May 2016, at 09:22, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > >> On 05/16/2016 09:43, Nikola M wrote: >>> On 05/16/16 05:58 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> Reporting my progress so nobody gets the idea this little technology >>> demonstration project has been

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Docs - updated

On 05/16/2016 09:43, Nikola M wrote: On 05/16/16 05:58 AM, Michael Kruger wrote: Hello All, Reporting my progress so nobody gets the idea this little technology demonstration project has been abandoned. Far from it, there has been continued development. See it all here: