Armin Waibel wrote:
A workaround will be to configure once LockManagerRemoteImpl by hand
before the first use of odmg-api:
LockManager lm = LockManagerFactory.getLockManager();
if(lm instanceof Configurable)
{
Configurator configurator = OjbConfigurator.getInstance();
configurator.configure((Lo
Hi Phil,
DiCorpo, Phillip wrote:
I've created my own LockManager implementation for OJB 1.0.4 that
implements the Configurable interface and I've added some of the
properties this implementation needs to the OJB.properties file. By
doing so I was hoping that my LockManager would be configured a
hi sergey,
what do the criteria look like ? do you use or-criteria ?
ojb provides a method to force an outer join, but currently there's no
way to prevent the usage of the outer join.
please post your classes, the report-query and if possible the
ddl-statements so i can try to reproduce this
I've created my own LockManager implementation for OJB 1.0.4 that
implements the Configurable interface and I've added some of the
properties this implementation needs to the OJB.properties file. By
doing so I was hoping that my LockManager would be configured at some
point, like in the LockManage
Hi Jacob,
Well, see yourself if it is a clever behavior:
Here is a simplified repository data:
...
And using a ReportQuery with fields:
{"pkField","allChildren.allTypes.typeDescription"}
Hi Dirk,
Kessler, Dirk wrote:
Armin, thanks for your reply.
We have transactions that span multiple web requests (pages) and we use
the PK values to identify objects that have been persisted on the
various pages (in order to re-display the contents of the objects if the
user goes back to one of
hi sergey,
ojb just tries to be clever ;) outer joins are created when there are
extents etc.
could you please post the relevant parts of your mapping file and the
generated sql.
jakob
Manukyan, Sergey schrieb:
After some tests found out that OJB generates LEFT OUTER JOIN instead of
INNER
Armin, thanks for your reply.
We have transactions that span multiple web requests (pages) and we use
the PK values to identify objects that have been persisted on the
various pages (in order to re-display the contents of the objects if the
user goes back to one of those pages).
There are defini
hi matthieu,
ojb does nothing strange here. it's a p6spy feature that allows you to
log access to the result set.
... 818|-1||resultset|SELECT A0.VO_ID,A0.VO_N
this is the way to exclude resultset log entries :
#list of categories to exclude: error, info, batch, debug, statement,
#commi
hi nicolas,
i'm pleased the latest version works for you.
could you please post the error, or give me a hint where you found
discussions about the bug.
jakob
delahaye.nicolas schrieb:
Hi jakob,
Ok, it is working with 1.0.4.
But if i want retreive the super class alone, a wrong SLQ
query i
Hi Renaud,
Renaud Lévy wrote:
Hello,
I've got a simple problem of collection's retrieve :
There are 2 tables : InfoData and ValueData with foreign key and
datetime field
as it's describe in my repository
primarykey="true"/>
primarykey="true"/
Hello,
I've got a simple problem of collection's retrieve :
There are 2 tables : InfoData and ValueData with foreign key and
datetime field
as it's describe in my repository
primarykey="true"/>
primarykey="true"/>
primarykey="true"/>
Dear ojb user,
i've got a question about the behavior of OJB (1.0.3).
If i ask for a collection of vehicule OJB fetch the data from the database
to build the collection the expect bellow show what P6SPY catch :
[11/01/06 12:13:23:808 CET] 78faf5a0 SystemOut O
1136978003808|60|7|statement|
Armin,
I looked at it a little better and it is because i have my own cache
for model and view objects because they are used so much.
I think that I also understand why the initial organisation query only
queries the organisation and country table while there are a lot more
references. When the r
Hi Tom,
IMO this is not good news. It does not affect my work at the moment, but my
intent was to change my PB implementation to JDO when available with OJB 2.x.
I'd rather stay with OJB than restarting with JPOX.
Did the OJB team stop the activities concerning JDO?
Is it planned to make a decis
15 matches
Mail list logo
