I just caught this. It looks like spam to me:
http://openlibrary.org/books/OL25429637M/randburg_sameday_abortion_womens_clinic_pills_4_sale_0736613276
___
Ol-discuss mailing list
Ol-discuss@archive.org
Hi,
I just come to this after doing a few years on Wikipedia.
UI think it is a very impoprtant project, and i love the way it generates
Wikipedia citations.
A couple of questions:
why are the archives of this list disabled - I don't particularly want to
go over old ground
Also I put in a
On 16-Aug-2013, at 5:58 AM, fab...@unpopular.org.uk wrote:
Hi,
I just come to this after doing a few years on Wikipedia.
UI think it is a very impoprtant project, and i love the way it generates
Wikipedia citations.
A couple of questions:
why are the archives of this list disabled
Fabian,
By way of explanation (but not of solution) - publisher names are not
developed under authority control in the data sources that we have used.
Instead, the publisher name is what is copied from the book without an
attempt to normalize it.
Creating authorities for publishers has many
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
There is some discussion of adding authorities for publishers to
bibliographic data, but without removing the transcription from the
page. This will, however, require a new field for the publisher authority.
This would be
The discussion that I am aware of has taken place around the BIBFRAME
project:
http://bibframe.org
Look in the articles about authorities.
kc
On 8/16/13 10:16 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
There is some discussion of adding
