Karen / Jessamyn - this thread has drifted a long way from its original
topic (and the subject doesn't represent any of the things talked about),
so I'm going to spin up a new thread or two to cover the topics being
recently discussed. Some of them are probably more appropriate to ol-tech
than
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:44 PM, jessamyn c. west jessa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll be in touch with some of the IA folks after the holiday weekend
in the US and I will raise this question.
Jessamyn / Sam - did anything ever come of the discussions with the IA
folks?
I noticed Giovanni (@gdamdam
Jessamyn / Sam - did anything ever come of the discussions with the IA folks?
We had a very fruitful discussion about where we'd like to see things
going, but ultimately we have a fractional dev (Giovanni, who is
wonderful) which makes progress staggered at best as he moves between
projects.
On 30 June 2015 at 03:00, jessamyn c. west jessa...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for a late reply, it seems like you've done some great work.
We can work to update the documentation.
Thanks, I'm happy to be able to help out!
What should people like me who want to contribute to the codebase
On 7/2/15 4:35 AM, Charles Horn wrote:
I'm worried now that getting updates released might be a much harder
goal that getting code merged if there aren't any IA devs to oversee the
release process, or support if something should go wrong. Merging code
on github is one thing, getting it
On 02-Jul-2015, at 8:47 pm, jessamyn c. west jessa...@gmail.com wrote:
Anand no longer works for OL/IA but it's true I think it's true that
he had the test version. I'm a little new to OS development, what is
the difference between getting the code merged and deploying it?
While I’m not
On 02-Jul-2015, at 5:53 pm, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
On 7/2/15 4:35 AM, Charles Horn wrote:
I'm worried now that getting updates released might be a much harder
goal that getting code merged if there aren't any IA devs to oversee the
release process, or support if something
I'll be in touch with some of the IA folks after the holiday weekend
in the US and I will raise this question.
That list of spammers is HUGELY helpful because at least it's a few
clicks to undoing thousands of edits until we can script the process.
Jessamyn
librarian.net :::
On 30 June 2015 at 04:29, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 29, 2015 2:15 PM, Tom Morris tfmor...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a bunch of stuff that could be done to streamline the spam
flagging and processing, do more automated spam detection, etc. The
current web form
On Jun 29, 2015 2:15 PM, Tom Morris tfmor...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a bunch of stuff that could be done to streamline the spam
flagging and processing, do more automated spam detection, etc. The
current web form reporting and lone pioneer cleaning up doesn't scale...
It's sad to see
The ol-tech list is probably the right place to engage with potential
developers. We had a brief period of re-invigoration a couple of years ago
where a group of developers were granted commit privileges to the developer
pages on the wiki and started getting things cleaned up.
Forking the code
On 9 June 2015 at 04:18, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
My gut feeling is that the instructions at
http://code.openlibrary.org/en/latest/ may not be up to date, but if
folks are interesting in creating a version of OL we could ping the most
recent committer and find out exactly what
Colby,
Let's jumpstart that movement by forking
https://github.com/internetarchive/openlibrary
On Sunday, June 7, 2015, Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net wrote:
+1
On 6/7/15 8:25 AM, Colby Russell wrote:
On 06/06/2015 09:32 AM, jessamyn c. west wrote:
It's a thing that isn't built into the
I'm wondering if there are any plans to open up adminship/moderatorship
to some more people so volunteers can tidy up the mess rather than
having to report it. Zapping spam/vandalism/obvious crap as it happens
is important so as to ensure that OpenLibrary does not end with broken
I'm the one paid staff member that I know of who is Open Library only.
I've asked before about trying to get some granular level of privs
(merges and spam would be the two important ones) for power users.
It's a thing that isn't built into the back end so they've been
reluctant to do it' but it's
15 matches
Mail list logo
