Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

Hi Ben :) Am 26.04.2017 um 17:18 schrieb Ben Bullard: Don't know if this will help? It's a minimal ISO. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/3.0/products/40/product_build_lists/889 oh nice, i have directly downloaded and whant test it in 3 day's if i have a free day :) but let us count

[OM Cooker] Work in Bugzilla.

I have already made the mistake of doing the work first then writing the notice. I'm going thru open Lx 3.0 bugs to update and/or change. Some bugs closed due to lack of activity or filed against outdated packages or frankly sometimes my best guess. Do not mean to offend or diminish

Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

Don't know if this will help? It's a minimal ISO. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/3.0/products/40/product_build_lists/889 Ben Bullard ben79 OpenMandriva-QA Team On 04/26/2017 08:35 AM, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin wrote: >because was a rpm, really fresh

Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

Hi Alex :) Am 26.04.2017 um 15:35 schrieb Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin: >because was a rpm, really fresh installation.. and not a 2Gigabyte fad iso.. you want server iso or what? If you want you can just download minimal rootfs.tar.xz and extract it on the disk. naa, not i am, but if we have

Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

>because was a rpm, really fresh installation.. and not a 2Gigabyte fad iso.. you want server iso or what? If you want you can just download minimal rootfs.tar.xz and extract it on the disk. 2017-04-26 13:47 GMT+03:00 Blackcrack : > hmm, it is not one page wheres

[OM Cooker] TC Meeting Today 26-04-2017 5pm CET ... 4pm GMT

Hi All, There will be a TC meeting at the usual place and time this afternoon. Here's an agenda:- 1. Review of progress on createrepo_c 2. Review of progress on omdv rpm5 3. Review of progress in dnf 4. ABF progress on "build chains" 5. AOB I hope that we will be able to get some updates on

Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

hmm, it is not one page wheres shows it (so, the specialists have (like i guess) no fun for kicking through an nested informations) and some page attract anyone not really.. many have change since the beginnings ..(also the f.. installer *g*) this makes for peoples not more attractive .. rather

Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

>then wrong dependencies still ?" Because nobody fixed them. 2017-04-26 12:29 GMT+03:00 Blackcrack : > Hi Alex :), > > so.. why exit then wrong dependencies still ? > hmm.. maybe in this direction, as extra.. > where explicit check the dependencies and so on.. > and

Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

Hi Alex :), so.. why exit then wrong dependencies still ? hmm.. maybe in this direction, as extra.. where explicit check the dependencies and so on.. and can include in the repoclosure.openmandriva.org under the existent entry

Re: [OM Cooker] depencheck

You talking about repoclosure.openmandriva.org 26 апр. 2017 г. 10:12 пользователь "Blackcrack" написал: > Hi, > > it is possible for writing a "depencheck" ? > Where works for the whole rpms and it is > portable to the other achitectures ..(if possible) > > who checks

[OM Cooker] depencheck

Hi, it is possible for writing a "depencheck" ? Where works for the whole rpms and it is portable to the other achitectures ..(if possible) who checks all rpm on the server and log the not well rpms into a file where automatic resolve the depencies .. or only check the dependencies of the