[onap-discuss] Amsterdam Kubernetes OOM SDC UI is not accessible

Hi All, We are setting up Amsterdam kuberneter oom. The deployment went fine, even the ONAP portal login works fine. However when we try to access the SDC portal it is keep throwing 503 error message. And we looked at the SDC-BE and SDC-ES logs and it seems like the elastic serach container

[onap-discuss] [vnfsdk] VNF SDK Meeting Agenda for 3/2/18

Team, Agenda for tomorrow's VNF SDK Meeting is posted at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK+03-02-2018+Meeting Thanks, -- Brian Hedstrom Founder/CEO OAM Technology Consulting LLC oam.technology brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com 720-470-7091

[onap-discuss] Michael out of office mon/tue

Team, I will be at a remote customer site mon/tue so away from meetings Will miss the mon PTL coordinators meet Will miss running the Tue logging meeting https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/LOG+Meeting+Minutes+2018-02-27 /michael This message and the information contained herein is

Re: [onap-discuss] Regarding Full ONAP installation

Ankit, The WIP entrypoint script is attached to the jira – I just tested it on the latest master on a clean VM – it will automatically install Rancher 1.6 and OOM. A single namespace patch just went in 2 hours ago – so pods are coming up slower than normal (51 failures@20m (clean) and 21

Re: [onap-discuss] UUI health-check amsterdam

Hello, Any news on the same? This is giving bad publicity to UUI that health-check is failing in OOM. Please help us address this. Alexis > On Feb 20, 2018, at 12:47 PM, Alexis de Talhouët > wrote: > > Hi UUI experts, > > UUI health-check has been failing on

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Release management process is broken

I don’t have enough knowledge on this to answer your question, Gary. But my hope is we can get this fix so Beijing delivers tagged code as well. Thanks, Alexis > On Feb 28, 2018, at 3:32 PM, Gary Wu wrote: > > Usually the maven release plugin is used for this, which

[onap-discuss] 答复: RE: RE: RE: Re: 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

I think it is the first time in the ONAP to go through it. right? More infomation about the HPA data model in the ONAP model discussion, which is provided by Anatoly(ATT)。 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Hardware+Platform+Requirements is it same? BR Maopeng 原始邮件

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018

Reminder From: denghui (L) Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:33 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc Subject: [modeling]Poll on modeling workshop in ONS 2018 Hello all Please cast your vote on the date of workshop for modeling workshop in ONS 2018

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Sure, we can go through it one more time… From: zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn [mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 12:54 PM To: Vul, Alex Cc: yang...@huawei.com; jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: 答复: RE: RE: Re:

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

HPA requirement are not being defined by IFA. The IFA model simply defines the definition structure – what information elements are used to contain different parts of the HPA requirements. The HPA requirement names are driven by hardware vendor, in our case – ARM and Intel… From:

[onap-discuss] 答复: RE: RE: Re: 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

You can provide the discussion as input to the ONAP model. Let's discuss how to model it in the ONAP. Again we need the real input of HPA parameters definition, not only the keyvalue pairs. BR Maopeng 原始邮件 发件人：Vul,Alex 收件人：张茂鹏10030173;

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

The “requestAdditionalCapabilities” was left in the spec for backward compatibility – for already existing VNF implementations, done prior to release of IFA011 2.3.1… From: zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn [mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 12:37 PM To: Vul, Alex

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

They have been discussed… They have not been all added to the final draft… From: zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn [mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 12:37 PM To: Vul, Alex Cc: yang...@huawei.com; jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com;

[onap-discuss] 答复: RE: Re: 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Alex The "requestAdditionalCapabilities" are mainly keyvalue pairs in the IFA011. In R2, the HPA related KEYs should be as inputs and the key name or value structure should be discussed in the model. BR Maopeng 原始邮件 发件人：Vul,Alex

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Maopeng, Forgot to mention one more thing… Already existing VNFs, with already existing VNFDs that use alternative IFA011 HPA specification format, based on “requestAdditionalCapabilities” attribute, are not going to be impacted by this change… VNFs that are used as part of the VoLTE use

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Hi Maopeng, First, observe that “HPA Enablement” is not a project, but a functional requirement for R2 that is being implemented across multiple projects. This has been discussed and approved by the TSC and affected projects have subsequently passed the M1 and M2 milestones. The current plan

[onap-discuss] 答复: Re: 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Hi Alex As a model contributor, join the discussion. Could you give the specific HPA parameters and completed usecases in R2? Does the LAB need to provide some specific hardwares to test these features? If we model the HPA parameters and implemented in R2, I

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Jessie, Xu There are a few things still missing from the agreed upon model. We need to add in items related to the HPA support. HPA is a functional requirement being implemented in R2. We need to ensure that the agreed upon model does not preclude the implementation of HPA. Thank you, Alex

[onap-discuss] SDC- local development - how to?

Hello, Is there any instruction how to setup SDC for development in any IDE? Marcin ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Hi Jessie, For the agreement, please look at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version. The differences with IFA011 are shown in orange. As for “vnfProductName”, the agreement is to have the same name as IFA011 for the time being. Best regards, Xu 发件人: