Re: [onap-discuss] integration jenkins

[morgan.richomme]

Hi,

we shared a presentation last week by mail on our goal regarding ONAP CI/CD in 
Orange labs.
It seems that we have common goals.. :)
We planned to present it during the integration meeting this week

We connected to the weekly meeting on Tuesday but it seems it was neither the 
right time nor the right place
Could you confirm that the integration weekly meeting takes place on Tuesday 2 
PM UTC - (title of the wiki page not up to date as 2 PM UT is now 6 AM PST not 
7) or on Wednedsay 2:30PM UTC (first line) 
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6593670
Where can we see the agenda and the IRC meeting minutes of the previous 
meetings? I can see only video in the minute page.

Our goal is to setup a CI/CD chain in our lab for the community (connected to 
LF Jenkins) where we would like to daily automaticallly:
- deploy an ONAP master version on a bare metal infra / HA mode
- run tests module by module (current robot healthchecks)
- run E2E tests (vFW, vWhatever,...)
- report status

we already have an internal beta CI/CD chain (OPNFV XCI / Kolla HA on 5 servers 
(3 control and 2 compute nodes) - ONAP/Heat )
David who is involved in OPNFV XCI will show it during the OPNFV plugfest next 
week in Portland

/Morgan

Le vendredi 01 décembre 2017 à 06:05 +, Guo, Ruijing a écrit :
Hi, Helen

I am trying to automate ONAP installation including VNFs in one box.
The installation can be for demo, integration or code dev/debug.
The code is in http://gerrit.onap.org/r/demo/vagrant.


1.  Install openstack in 4 VMs (1 openstack controller, 2 openstack 
compute, 1 onap)

2.  Install ONAP by openstack heat

3.  Launch VNFs ( Not yet)

4.  Run closed-loop (Not yet)

There are 2 issues here:

1.  Docker pull in VM is slow ( I found the root-cause now)

2.  ONAP Heat was updated  ( I think it is stable now)

I am trying to leverage your knowledge to complete step 3 & 4.

Thanks,
-Ruijing

From: Yunxia Chen [mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 10:57 AM
To: Guo, Ruijing 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] integration jenkins

Hi, Ruijing,
We don’t have a Jenkins for vCPE or VoLTE yet. Our plan is to do it at Beijing 
release for vFW/vDNS, and vCPE after we automate all steps for testing vCPE.

Regards,

Helen Chen

From: "Guo, Ruijing" >
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 6:50 PM
To: Helen Chen 00725961 >
Cc: onap-discuss 
>
Subject: [onap-discuss] integration jenkins

Hi,  Helen

I am looking for document & Jenkins log to setup closed-loop demo
Did your team setup integration Jenkins for vCPE and VoLTE case?
Where is Jenkins setup code & Jenkins URL?
I just know https://gerrit.onap.org/r/demo & 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/integration

Thanks,
-Ruijing

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[HU, BIN]

Michael,

Looks very cool, and information shown are very helpful.

Thank you very much
Bin

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of OBRIEN, FRANK MICHAEL
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:53 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Bin,
 For reference, there is an unprotected continuous deployment server we use 
to verify commits running the OOM master build hourly (No DCAE yet) where you 
can get a view of the runtime configuration of a single node (ONAP R1 currently 
fits in a 64G vm) – the kubernetes UI will show individual docker container 
cpu/ram limits.
 Launch the rancher UI and the Kubernetes console to see resource usage
 The CD server gets cleared/recreated at the top of the hour and is usually 
up within 25-45 min depending on the health check status (which may push 
maximum wait time for pods-up) – it is idle for the last 15 min of the hour.
  Note it is only a 4 core VM – so multiple users may slow the system

  Rancher UI: 
http://dev.onap.info:8880/env/1a7/infra/hosts/1h1/containers
 - it may switch back to cd.onap.info in the future
  Kubernetes Console: 
http://dev.onap.info:8880/r/projects/1a7/kubernetes-dashboard:9090/#!/pod?namespace=_all
  Check status at 
http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd/

  Thank you
  /michael


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO 
(MARCO)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 14:14
To: HU, BIN >; 
eric.deb...@orange.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Bin,

Are you talking about the k8s cluster? If so, please look at these best 
practices: 
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/highly-available-master/

Marco

From: "HU, BIN" >
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" 
>, 
"eric.deb...@orange.com" 
>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-  Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-  Recommended number of worker nodes?

-  Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-  Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster 

Re: [onap-discuss] integration jenkins

[Guo, Ruijing]

Hi, Helen

I am trying to automate ONAP installation including VNFs in one box.
The installation can be for demo, integration or code dev/debug.
The code is in http://gerrit.onap.org/r/demo/vagrant.


1.  Install openstack in 4 VMs (1 openstack controller, 2 openstack 
compute, 1 onap)

2.  Install ONAP by openstack heat

3.  Launch VNFs ( Not yet)

4.  Run closed-loop (Not yet)

There are 2 issues here:

1.  Docker pull in VM is slow ( I found the root-cause now)

2.  ONAP Heat was updated  ( I think it is stable now)

I am trying to leverage your knowledge to complete step 3 & 4.

Thanks,
-Ruijing

From: Yunxia Chen [mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 10:57 AM
To: Guo, Ruijing 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] integration jenkins

Hi, Ruijing,
We don’t have a Jenkins for vCPE or VoLTE yet. Our plan is to do it at Beijing 
release for vFW/vDNS, and vCPE after we automate all steps for testing vCPE.

Regards,

Helen Chen

From: "Guo, Ruijing" >
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 6:50 PM
To: Helen Chen 00725961 >
Cc: onap-discuss 
>
Subject: [onap-discuss] integration jenkins

Hi,  Helen

I am looking for document & Jenkins log to setup closed-loop demo
Did your team setup integration Jenkins for vCPE and VoLTE case?
Where is Jenkins setup code & Jenkins URL?
I just know https://gerrit.onap.org/r/demo & 
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/integration

Thanks,
-Ruijing
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] RAM Upgrades @ ONAP Dev Pod Sunday, Dec 3rd

[Michael O'Brien]

Stephen,
   Will do - I'll shutdown the 83G HEAT deployment on the Logging client 
Saturday.
/michael

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gooch, Stephen
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:34
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] RAM Upgrades @ ONAP Dev Pod Sunday, Dec 3rd

Hello,

On Sunday, Dec 3rd ~5 PM PST, the ONAP Developed Pod will receive an additional 
1TB of RAM.   An upgrade such as this should happen without service 
interruption.  However, since the POD's memory usage is greater than 90% of the 
current capacity, there is not enough RAM to fully migrate all VMs off any 
given server.   Thus, we are requesting that older stacks and VMs that are not 
currently in use are shut down to facilitate a live upgrade (by Sunday 
afternoon PST).

Br,
- Stephen

Stephen Gooch | Senior Member of Technical Staff | Wind River
+1.510.965.7909 , Skype ID: Stephen.gooch

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[Michael O'Brien]

Bin,
 For reference, there is an unprotected continuous deployment server we use 
to verify commits running the OOM master build hourly (No DCAE yet) where you 
can get a view of the runtime configuration of a single node (ONAP R1 currently 
fits in a 64G vm) – the kubernetes UI will show individual docker container 
cpu/ram limits.
 Launch the rancher UI and the Kubernetes console to see resource usage
 The CD server gets cleared/recreated at the top of the hour and is usually 
up within 25-45 min depending on the health check status (which may push 
maximum wait time for pods-up) – it is idle for the last 15 min of the hour.
  Note it is only a 4 core VM – so multiple users may slow the system

  Rancher UI: http://dev.onap.info:8880/env/1a7/infra/hosts/1h1/containers 
- it may switch back to cd.onap.info in the future
  Kubernetes Console: 
http://dev.onap.info:8880/r/projects/1a7/kubernetes-dashboard:9090/#!/pod?namespace=_all
  Check status at http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd/

  Thank you
  /michael


From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO 
(MARCO)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 14:14
To: HU, BIN ; eric.deb...@orange.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Bin,

Are you talking about the k8s cluster? If so, please look at these best 
practices: 
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/highly-available-master/

Marco

From: "HU, BIN" >
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" 
>, 
"eric.deb...@orange.com" 
>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-Recommended number of worker nodes?

-Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From: 
>
 on behalf of "eric.deb...@orange.com" 
>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first 

[onap-discuss] vFirewall HEAT and OOM meetings - Ending the 1200 HEAT meeting - we have 2 vFWCL videos and will consolidate config/flow to the wiki - continuing OOM testing

[Michael O'Brien]

Team,
We would like to thank everyone of the 20+ onap developers (Alexis de 
Talhouet, Brian Freeman, Marco Platania, Josef Reisinger, Ran Pollak, Geora 
Barsky, Ramki Krishnan, Arun Arora, Jerry Flood, Jimmy Forsyth,  Ramesh 
Tammana, Mars Toktonaliev, Borislav GlozmanJerry Flood, Joanna Xu, Gordon 
Olson...) that helped out greatly with testing the new vFWCL flow in the 1200 
HEAT and 1100 OOM meetings - on top of all the assistance via wiki comments and 
onap-discuss config - since we have multiple full videos from Marco and Alexis 
C. - of the process and recordings of the workarounds/JIRA's I think we can 
concentrate on finishing vFWCL deployment in OOM.  I will close the 1200 HEAT 
meetings and work off the wiki and onap-discuss as we have.  We raised/reopened 
a couple JIRAs encountered during the flows.

The meeting today was exclusively OOM master - OOM R1 tomorrow
Today we had very good progress getting up to service creation in OOM - 
Alexis, Brian and Marco identified and were critical in navigating several 
configuration issues/JIRAs and a lot of additional operational and devops paths.
Alexis and Brian have several gerrit reviews in the queue so we can 
continue tomorrow into VNF creation.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Vetted+vFirewall+Demo+-+Full+draft+how-to+for+F2F+and+ReadTheDocs#VettedvFirewallDemo-Fulldrafthow-toforF2FandReadTheDocs-FixestoPullandTest

The daily videos are uploaded to the wiki as a record of all 
operational/workaround changes/issues we encountered.  Will also before the 2 
conferences get final artifacts, details and postman templates up and move the 
page.

 Thank you
 /Michael

Michael O'Brien
Amdocs Technology
16135955268
55268
[amdocs-a]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [container/COE, multicloud] meeting scheduled Thursday 6:00PM-7:00PM(PST)/02:00(UTC)/10:00am(CST) From Nov 30, 2017(was Re: [container/COE, multicloud] ONAP container) discussion

[Isaku Yamahata]

Hello.

I should've sent reminder yesterday.
Anyway we had a meeting today.

Dec 7/8: skip
Dec 12: ONAP F2F session.
Dec 14: skip due to ONAP event
Dec 21/22: will be decided on the session

Thanks,

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:00:17AM -0800,
Isaku Yamahata  wrote:

> Oops. the meeting will be started from Nov 30, 2017.
> As Nov 23, 2017 is holiday in US. many people would be absent.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:56:37AM -0800,
> Isaku Yamahata  wrote:
> 
> > According to doodle result, I decided the following time slot.
> > The meeting will be held from
> > Thur Nov 23, 2017 6:00PM-7:00PM(PST)/02:00(UTC)/10:00am(CST)
> > 
> > I've requested meeting creation. If it's not created in time
> > I'll use my free zoom account. In that case I'll announce it.
> > 
> > > time slot: Weekly meeting
> > > Thursday 6:00PM-7:00PM(PST)/02:00(UTC)/10:00am(CST)
> > >  From Nov 23, 2017
> > >  Team: ONAP container
> > > Related wiki page: 
> > > https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16007890
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:12:41AM -0800,
> > Isaku Yamahata  wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello.
> > > 
> > > On Nov 14, 2017 at architecture meeting, I presented proposal on
> > > ONAP container support which is follow-up at the session in France.
> > > The feedback is to have online meeting and come up with
> > > archtecture/design choices with comparison and come back to
> > > archtecture meeting again. I'd like to start meeting
> > > 
> > > I created a wiki page to track matrials, meetings.
> > > 
> > >   ONAP container/COE page
> > >   https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16007890
> > >   Slide used on Nov 14, 2017
> > >   
> > > https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16007890/onap-container-for-architecture-subcommittee.pdf?version=1=1510686749000=v2
> > > 
> > > 
> > > * determining timeslot
> > > 
> > > I'd like to have first oneline meeting during the week of
> > > Nov 20 or Nov 27, 2017.
> > > 
> > > I created doodle poll to determine first zoom meeting and timeslot for
> > > weekly meeting.  If you'd like to attend it, please vote it.
> > >   doodle poll
> > >   https://doodle.com/poll/cpedwwmazqimadpw
> > > 
> > > 
> > > NOTE:
> > > - Tuesday: conflicts with archtecture subcommittee meeting
> > > - Friday: conflicts with multicloud meeting
> > > - Thurs 30, Nov is holidy in US.(and people tends to be PTO on Dec 1.)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > timeline:
> > > * the week of Nov 20 or Nov 27, 2017: first online meetig
> > > * the week of Dec 4: kubecon: will skip
> > > * the week of Dec 11: ONAP developer event. Let's have f2f session there.
> > > * the week of Dec 18:
> > > * after that, online meeting
> > >   Maybe people will be on vacation around chrismas/new year
> > > * The week of Jan 8: ...
> > > * The week of TBD: archtecture subcommittee meeting
> > > 
> > > Thanks in advance
> > > -- 
> > > Isaku Yamahata 
> > > ___
> > > onap-discuss mailing list
> > > onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> > > https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Isaku Yamahata 
> > ___
> > onap-discuss mailing list
> > onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> > https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Isaku Yamahata 
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
> 

-- 
Isaku Yamahata 
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] ONAP Community Award Nominations

[Kenny Paul]

Just follow the link. :-)
ONAP Community Award Nominations 



Best Regards, 
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
kp...@linuxfoundation.org
510.766.5945

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Official Developer Event Schedule Released

[Kenny Paul]

The Sched app for the event is Available Now.

This will be the official source of truth for the event schedule from now on 
with the following caveats:

- Speakers please validate your sessions. If something needs to be corrected 
use this link Accepted Session Change Request 
.
  As before, 
Scheduling changes will be accommodated to the best of our ability if you have 
been inadvertently double booked as a speaker. This means that one of the 
sessions cannot proceed because you are either leading or presenting at a 
conflicting session. Simply wanting to participate in the other session does 
not qualify. 
If you want to change your room and/or time-slot, for any reason other than 
being double booked as a speaker, it is your responsibility to negotiate a 
switch with the other presenter.  Once both parties have agreed to the change, 
then please use the link on the wiki page, including the negotiation thread so 
that we can adjust the schedule.

- Team huddle rooms currently reserved on the wiki page still need to be 
entered into Sched. Please do not send an email letting me know it isn’t there, 
we already know. :-) 

- The wiki will still be used for RESERVING team huddle rooms. Once reserved on 
the wiki page they will be added to the schedule shortly thereafter.

https://onapbeijing2017.sched.com 



Best Regards, 
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
kp...@linuxfoundation.org
510.766.5945

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [vnfsdk] VNF SDK Meeting Agenda for 12/1/17

[Brian Hedstrom]

Team,

Agenda for tomorrow's VNF SDK Meeting is posted at:

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK+12-01-2017+Meeting

Please see assigned action items.

Thanks


-- 
Brian Hedstrom
Founder/CEO
OAM Technology Consulting LLC
oamtechnologyconsulting.com
brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com
720-470-7091
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

Bin,

Are you talking about the k8s cluster? If so, please look at these best 
practices: 
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/highly-available-master/

Marco

From: "HU, BIN" 
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" , 
"eric.deb...@orange.com" , 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-  Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-  Recommended number of worker nodes?

-  Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-  Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From: 
>
 on behalf of "eric.deb...@orange.com" 
>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[HU, BIN]

Is there a typical cluster configuration documented somewhere? such as:

-  Recommended number of master nodes for HA?

-  Recommended number of worker nodes?

-  Recommended capacity of each master node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

-  Recommended capacity of each worker node (CPUs, RAM and storage)?

Thanks
Bin

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:55 AM
To: eric.deb...@orange.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From: 
>
 on behalf of "eric.deb...@orange.com" 
>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] RAM Upgrades @ ONAP Dev Pod Sunday, Dec 3rd

[Gooch, Stephen]

Hello,

On Sunday, Dec 3rd ~5 PM PST, the ONAP Developed Pod will receive an additional 
1TB of RAM.   An upgrade such as this should happen without service 
interruption.  However, since the POD's memory usage is greater than 90% of the 
current capacity, there is not enough RAM to fully migrate all VMs off any 
given server.   Thus, we are requesting that older stacks and VMs that are not 
currently in use are shut down to facilitate a live upgrade (by Sunday 
afternoon PST).

Br,
- Stephen

Stephen Gooch | Senior Member of Technical Staff | Wind River
+1.510.965.7909 , Skype ID: Stephen.gooch

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

Eric,

You are right saying that full HA deployment will require a lot of resources, 
but that is true for the Heat approach only. If we use K8s, instead of 7 VMs 
for SDNC (SDNC here is just an example, based on numbers that Dan provided) we 
have 3 times (still based on Dan’s numbers) the number of containers that SDNC 
runs in a non-replicated environment.

Then, we need to adjust the size of the cluster accordingly. As I said in a 
previous email, the resource required by each single container depend on what 
that container does. I don’t have number to share, except that, based on OOM 
Team’s experience, 64 GB worked well for non-replicated ONAP (excluding DCAE). 
I expected that number going up when we use HA, but still reasonably, not even 
close to what Heat would require.

Marco

From:  on behalf of 
"eric.deb...@orange.com" 
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
To: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource 
needs

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Deploying SDC on a Linux VM for Development

[Morales, Victor]

Agree, but vagrant-onap tool can be also used without vagrant (maybe another 
name could be helpful) and consume only the functions [1].  The idea of this 
project is to centralize all the efforts for provisioning a development 
environment.

Regards,
Victor Morales

[1] 
http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/integration.git/bootstrap/vagrant-onap/doc/source/features/consuming_scripts.html


From: Vitaliy Emporopulo 
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 7:16 AM
To: Victor Morales , Thamlur Raju 
, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 

Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] Deploying SDC on a Linux VM for Development

This is not about Vagrant. Thamlur asked if an SDC environment can be created 
without Vagrant. It definitely can, so I pointed to the documentation that 
describes the procedure.

Regards,
Vitaliy

From: Morales, Victor [mailto:victor.mora...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 17:03
To: Vitaliy Emporopulo ; Thamlur Raju 
; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Deploying SDC on a Linux VM for Development

Howdy,

I tried to collect some of the instructions in the vagrant-onap tool [1], it’s 
quite hard to follow what every project is doing in order to have a single tool 
that provisions a development environment.  The documentation of its usage has 
been published here [2].

Regards,
Victor Morales

PS. I’m going to try to include the instructions described by Thamlur.

[1] https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/bootstrap/vagrant-onap/lib/sdc
[2] 
http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submodules/integration.git/bootstrap/vagrant-onap/doc/source/index.html?highlight=vagrant



From: 
>
 on behalf of Vitaliy Emporopulo 
>
Date: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 at 3:45 AM
To: Thamlur Raju >, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Deploying SDC on a Linux VM for Development

Hi Thamlur,

I successfully deployed SDC version 1.1.0 inside a VM (Ubuntu 14.04) a few days 
ago, from scratch. Please follow 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Deploying+SDC+on+a+Linux+VM+for+Development.

You’ll have to build and run the SDC Simulator separately. Keep in mind that it 
currently doesn’t work “as is” from master because of 
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-698. Follow the bug description to build the 
simulator from utils/webseal-simulator.

Regards,
Vitaliy

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Thamlur Raju
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 11:05
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] Deploying SDC on a Linux VM for Development

Hi,
I am trying create a development env, but i am not able to enable the 
SDC-Simulator. Because i doesn't have the Vagrant environment.
1. Without Vagrant environment we can't access the SDC-Simulator ?
2. Without Vagrant environment i can't get the " webseal-simulator " project? 
if i will get where i will get it?




Thanks,
Thamlur Raju.
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[eric.debeau]

Hello

We first need to define what we want to test on the labs.

We need various platforms to test at least a minimal installation on various 
environments to validate that the installation works fine in different 
environments (ie 3 different platforms) in a daily basis.
I believe that we need around 100~150 GB RAM memory for that (we are working to 
optimize a minimal installation).
We can offer our lab for that.

Each project should test their various modules in standalone and cluster mode 
and that should not require such many resources on a project basis.

Now, do we need to test a full HA mode for all the components ?
If yes, It may require a huge amount of resources according to first answers 
(eg SDNC) running on different platforms.
We need to estimate that.

Best Regards

Eric

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] vFirewall status OOM/HEAT hands-on meetings - Agenda

[Michael O'Brien]

ONAP Enthusiasts,
   Yesterday we had good progress getting SDC onboarding finished in OOM
   When we switched to HEAT at 12 we were able test the first preload of the 
vFW sink - but we ran into a failed SDNC controller container on it's VM when 
the HD became saturated after 27 hours up time.  Later a reboot of SDNC allowed 
the preload to succeed but we were unable to do a VF-Module creation because of 
a bug deleting the previously failed VF-Module attached to the VNF.

https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Vetted+vFirewall+Demo+-+Full+draft+how-to+for+F2F+and+ReadTheDocs

   Agenda for vFW testing today
   Since we now have 2 separate E2E videos of the vFWCL including closed-loop 
from Marco and Alexis - we have covered off HEAT - we just need to backport the 
changes to the wiki.

Marco
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Running+the+ONAP+Demos?preview=/1015891/16010290/vFW_closed_loop.mp4
Alexis
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Running+the+ONAP+Demos?preview=/1015891/16010543/vFW_Closed_Loop_SO_API.mp4

   We have been testing master HEAT - we need to certify release-1.1.0 now - 
Since I am not able to bring up a 2nd environment in OpenLab mostly due to 
blade capacity issues - we can do this easier on AWS under OOM for the 
Amsterdam release.  We don't have the AAI DNS issue in AAI-460 and the SDNC HD 
issue because of the flat host model of Kubernetes - so we will switch to OOM 
and see if we can get to VF-Module creation as well.
   I recommend we concentrate on OOM for the next 2 days during the 2 hours 
from 1100-1300 - I am bringing up 2 more clean environments there that we can 
use in the call.
   Likely we will end all the 11/12 meetings on Friday - and cancel next week's 
meetings during KubeCon/PlugFest next week and the F2F after that.

JIRAs in queue
https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-475
https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-513
https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-460
https://jira.onap.org/browse/INT-346
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDNC-208
https://jira.onap.org/browse/SDC-716

thank you
/michael




Michael O'Brien
Amdocs Technology
16135955268
55268
[amdocs-a]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

I don’t think there is a real relationship between number of containers and 
resource needed, it mainly depends on what kind of computation you are doing. I 
leave the answer to the experts (OOM team) but a while ago I was told that on 
average you roughly need 2 GB per container, but I don’t know how accurate this 
is.

Today’s OOM cluster is 64 GB (without DCAE). That seems OK for non-replicated 
ONAP.

Marco

From: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" 
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:46 AM
To: "PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)" , Gildas Lanilis 
, "TIMONEY, DAN" , onap-release 

Cc: onap-discuss 
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

That does make sense – perhaps another set of columns or separate table for 
container data.

How do you measure/estimate the memory needed for a container ?

Brian



From: PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:41 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; Gildas Lanilis 
; TIMONEY, DAN ; onap-release 

Cc: onap-discuss 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Brian,

Thanks for the clarification, I was also confused. Resource assessment is 
important for HEAT, which needs to know #CPUs, memory, etc. of each specific VM.

If we use OOM for Beijing (as I understand), in my opinion the right way to 
think about it is container-level, rather than VM-level. This means that PTLs 
should tell how many instances of their component they need (or, put in another 
way, how many replicas of their containers they need). Resource sizing is then 
made at cluster level. Depending on how many containers we’ll need to support, 
the OOM cluster size will be adjusted.

Does it make sense?

Marco

From: 
>
 on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" >
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
>, "TIMONEY, DAN" 
>, onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.


Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN >; onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
>; onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

[ROSE, DANIEL V]

Can you do any sort of trace or packet capture both to and from that vm? Sounds 
like either the interface didn't come up correctly or the cloud is not allowing 
packets to flow.

Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:45 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Thanks Brian. Also another info I didn't mention before: with this issue I am 
not even able to ping the VM.
Best Regards
Arun

From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D >
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:08:15 PM
To: Arun Arora (c); 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hmm - cant help - dont know if your environment is doing security groups that 
blocks by default. Perhaps Marco has run into this problem before.

Brian


From: Arun Arora (c) [mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:33 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

No, the keypair is fine. Also I am using the keypair I created and not the one 
which comes as default in demo's env file.
I am able to ssh on VM on its ONAP network interface in any scenario but not on 
external network interface when the VM had interfaces for both networks created 
by Demo Stack.
Thanks
Arun
From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails
To: Arun Arora (c), 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
We usually only log in via the external IP for testing - seems strange that 
behavoir would change by detaching interfaces but we it is a VPP application so 
the protected/unprotected vNICs shouldn't really be setup for login.

Is the problem that the public key used in preload doesnt match the private.key 
you are using ?

Brian






From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:14 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hi All,

While trying to create vFW and vLB/ vDNS demos I am facing the following issue 
in both demos:
For both demos able to create the stack which creates 3 VMs and their 
associated networks In vFW demo, vFirewall application VM has both 'protected' 
and 'unprotected' networks configured on its interfacesIn vLB/ vDNS demo, 
Load-Balance VM has both 'lb01_private' and 'pktget01_private' networks 
configured on its interfaces Issue: SSH on both VMs ("vFirewall application VM" 
and "Load-Balance VM") fails when its done using their External Interface IP or 
the IPs from the networks created with the demo stacks (i.e.  'protected', 
'unprotected', 'lb01_private' or 'pktget01_private')I can only SSH then through 
the IP assigned by ONAP networkFurther to this, if any interface on 'protected' 
and 'unprotected' is detached from vFirewall application VM, and VM is 
restarted then SSH using external interface works!! Same happens for 
Load-Balance VM!

Is this issue seen by anyone? Any pointers to resolve this?

Thanks,
Arun
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] APPC code compile fail

[CHO, TAKAMUNE]

Hi Victor,

There are some projects facing the same error. We are working with CCSDK and 
oparent team now. And will get back to you once the problem fixed.

Apologies for any inconvenience

Taka c...@att.com

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gaoweitao (Victor, 
MANO)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:18 AM
To: onap-discuss 
Subject: [onap-discuss] APPC code compile fail

Hi APPC Team,
I download the APPC code of Amsterdam branch, but when I try to 
compile appc code, it reports fail due to parent pom.

[INFO] Scanning for projects...
Downloading: 
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/public/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/releases/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/public/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/staging/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR]   The project org.openecomp.appc:appc:1.2.1-SNAPSHOT (E: 
\APPC\appc\pom.xml) has 1 error
[ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not transfer artifact 
org.onap.ccsdk.parent:odlparent-carbon-sr1:pom:0.1.0 from/to openecomp-release 
(https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/releases/):
 Error transferring file: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path 
building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: 
unable to find valid certification path to requested target and 
'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM @ line 27, column 13 -> [Help 2]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e 
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please 
read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
[ERROR] [Help 2] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/UnresolvableModelException

Can anyone help me check this?

BR
Victor

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[FREEMAN, BRIAN D]

That does make sense – perhaps another set of columns or separate table for 
container data.

How do you measure/estimate the memory needed for a container ?

Brian



From: PLATANIA, MARCO
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:41 AM
To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D ; Gildas Lanilis 
; TIMONEY, DAN ; onap-release 

Cc: onap-discuss 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

Brian,

Thanks for the clarification, I was also confused. Resource assessment is 
important for HEAT, which needs to know #CPUs, memory, etc. of each specific VM.

If we use OOM for Beijing (as I understand), in my opinion the right way to 
think about it is container-level, rather than VM-level. This means that PTLs 
should tell how many instances of their component they need (or, put in another 
way, how many replicas of their containers they need). Resource sizing is then 
made at cluster level. Depending on how many containers we’ll need to support, 
the OOM cluster size will be adjusted.

Does it make sense?

Marco

From: 
>
 on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" >
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
>, "TIMONEY, DAN" 
>, onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.

Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN >; onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
>; onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From: 
>
 on behalf of Gildas Lanilis 
>
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: onap-release 

Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

[Arun Arora (c)]

Thanks Brian. Also another info I didn't mention before: with this issue I am 
not even able to ping the VM.

Best Regards
Arun

From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D 
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 8:08:15 PM
To: Arun Arora (c); onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hmm – cant help – dont know if your environment is doing security groups that 
blocks by default. Perhaps Marco has run into this problem before.

Brian


From: Arun Arora (c) [mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:33 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

No, the keypair is fine. Also I am using the keypair I created and not the one 
which comes as default in demo's env file.
I am able to ssh on VM on its ONAP network interface in any scenario but not on 
external network interface when the VM had interfaces for both networks created 
by Demo Stack.
Thanks
Arun

From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails
To: Arun Arora (c), 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

We usually only log in via the external IP for testing – seems strange that 
behavoir would change by detaching interfaces but we it is a VPP application so 
the protected/unprotected vNICs shouldn’t really be setup for login.

Is the problem that the public key used in preload doesnt match the private.key 
you are using ?

Brian






From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:14 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hi All,

While trying to create vFW and vLB/ vDNS demos I am facing the following issue 
in both demos:
For both demos able to create the stack which creates 3 VMs and their 
associated networks In vFW demo, vFirewall application VM has both ‘protected’ 
and ‘unprotected’ networks configured on its interfacesIn vLB/ vDNS demo, 
Load-Balance VM has both ‘lb01_private’ and ‘pktget01_private’ networks 
configured on its interfaces Issue: SSH on both VMs (“vFirewall application VM” 
and “Load-Balance VM”) fails when its done using their External Interface IP or 
the IPs from the networks created with the demo stacks (i.e.  ‘protected’, 
‘unprotected’, ‘lb01_private’ or ‘pktget01_private’)I can only SSH then through 
the IP assigned by ONAP networkFurther to this, if any interface on ‘protected’ 
and ‘unprotected’ is detached from vFirewall application VM, and VM is 
restarted then SSH using external interface works!! Same happens for 
Load-Balance VM!

Is this issue seen by anyone? Any pointers to resolve this?

Thanks,
Arun

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

I was pretty sure the private key was mismatching the public key used during 
the installation, but this doesn’t seem to be the case. Security group can be 
an issue, even though he’s able to access the VMs via the private network.

Is the path to the private key correct when you try to access them via the 
public IP? I can’t think of other possible causes.

Marco

From:  on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" 

Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:38 AM
To: "Arun Arora (c)" , "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.


Hmm – cant help – dont know if your environment is doing security groups that 
blocks by default. Perhaps Marco has run into this problem before.

Brian


From: Arun Arora (c) [mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:33 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

No, the keypair is fine. Also I am using the keypair I created and not the one 
which comes as default in demo's env file.
I am able to ssh on VM on its ONAP network interface in any scenario but not on 
external network interface when the VM had interfaces for both networks created 
by Demo Stack.
Thanks
Arun


From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails
To: Arun Arora (c), 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org


We usually only log in via the external IP for testing – seems strange that 
behavoir would change by detaching interfaces but we it is a VPP application so 
the protected/unprotected vNICs shouldn’t really be setup for login.

Is the problem that the public key used in preload doesnt match the private.key 
you are using ?

Brian






From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:14 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hi All,

While trying to create vFW and vLB/ vDNS demos I am facing the following issue 
in both demos:
For both demos able to create the stack which creates 3 VMs and their 
associated networks In vFW demo, vFirewall application VM has both ‘protected’ 
and ‘unprotected’ networks configured on its interfacesIn vLB/ vDNS demo, 
Load-Balance VM has both ‘lb01_private’ and ‘pktget01_private’ networks 
configured on its interfaces Issue: SSH on both VMs (“vFirewall application VM” 
and “Load-Balance VM”) fails when its done using their External Interface IP or 
the IPs from the networks created with the demo stacks (i.e.  ‘protected’, 
‘unprotected’, ‘lb01_private’ or ‘pktget01_private’)I can only SSH then through 
the IP assigned by ONAP networkFurther to this, if any interface on ‘protected’ 
and ‘unprotected’ is detached from vFirewall application VM, and VM is 
restarted then SSH using external interface works!! Same happens for 
Load-Balance VM!

Is this issue seen by anyone? Any pointers to resolve this?

Thanks,
Arun


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO)]

Brian,

Thanks for the clarification, I was also confused. Resource assessment is 
important for HEAT, which needs to know #CPUs, memory, etc. of each specific VM.

If we use OOM for Beijing (as I understand), in my opinion the right way to 
think about it is container-level, rather than VM-level. This means that PTLs 
should tell how many instances of their component they need (or, put in another 
way, how many replicas of their containers they need). Resource sizing is then 
made at cluster level. Depending on how many containers we’ll need to support, 
the OOM cluster size will be adjusted.

Does it make sense?

Marco

From:  on behalf of "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" 

Date: Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 9:07 AM
To: Gildas Lanilis , "TIMONEY, DAN" 
, onap-release 
Cc: onap-discuss 
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB 
resource needs

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.


Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN ; onap-release 
Cc: onap-discuss ; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 

Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
>; onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From: 
>
 on behalf of Gildas Lanilis 
>
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" >
Subject: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Hi PTLs,

We need your help.
We are working with Catherine, Helen and Brian on estimating the needs in term 
of Integration Lab resources for Beijing Release. This is important as it will 
most certainly impact $ budget and thus may require TSC and GB approval.
The details have been posted in the wiki at 

Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

[FREEMAN, BRIAN D]

Hmm - cant help - dont know if your environment is doing security groups that 
blocks by default. Perhaps Marco has run into this problem before.

Brian


From: Arun Arora (c) [mailto:aroraa...@vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:33 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

No, the keypair is fine. Also I am using the keypair I created and not the one 
which comes as default in demo's env file.
I am able to ssh on VM on its ONAP network interface in any scenario but not on 
external network interface when the VM had interfaces for both networks created 
by Demo Stack.
Thanks
Arun

From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails
To: Arun Arora (c), 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

We usually only log in via the external IP for testing - seems strange that 
behavoir would change by detaching interfaces but we it is a VPP application so 
the protected/unprotected vNICs shouldn't really be setup for login.

Is the problem that the public key used in preload doesnt match the private.key 
you are using ?

Brian






From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:14 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hi All,

While trying to create vFW and vLB/ vDNS demos I am facing the following issue 
in both demos:
For both demos able to create the stack which creates 3 VMs and their 
associated networks In vFW demo, vFirewall application VM has both 'protected' 
and 'unprotected' networks configured on its interfacesIn vLB/ vDNS demo, 
Load-Balance VM has both 'lb01_private' and 'pktget01_private' networks 
configured on its interfaces Issue: SSH on both VMs ("vFirewall application VM" 
and "Load-Balance VM") fails when its done using their External Interface IP or 
the IPs from the networks created with the demo stacks (i.e.  'protected', 
'unprotected', 'lb01_private' or 'pktget01_private')I can only SSH then through 
the IP assigned by ONAP networkFurther to this, if any interface on 'protected' 
and 'unprotected' is detached from vFirewall application VM, and VM is 
restarted then SSH using external interface works!! Same happens for 
Load-Balance VM!

Is this issue seen by anyone? Any pointers to resolve this?

Thanks,
Arun

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

[Arun Arora (c)]

No, the keypair is fine. Also I am using the keypair I created and not the one 
which comes as default in demo's env file.
I am able to ssh on VM on its ONAP network interface in any scenario but not on 
external network interface when the VM had interfaces for both networks created 
by Demo Stack.

Thanks
Arun


From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 7:58 PM
Subject: RE: VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails
To: Arun Arora (c), onap-discuss@lists.onap.org


We usually only log in via the external IP for testing – seems strange that 
behavoir would change by detaching interfaces but we it is a VPP application so 
the protected/unprotected vNICs shouldn’t really be setup for login.

Is the problem that the public key used in preload doesnt match the private.key 
you are using ?

Brian






From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:14 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hi All,

While trying to create vFW and vLB/ vDNS demos I am facing the following issue 
in both demos:
For both demos able to create the stack which creates 3 VMs and their 
associated networks In vFW demo, vFirewall application VM has both ‘protected’ 
and ‘unprotected’ networks configured on its interfacesIn vLB/ vDNS demo, 
Load-Balance VM has both ‘lb01_private’ and ‘pktget01_private’ networks 
configured on its interfaces Issue: SSH on both VMs (“vFirewall application VM” 
and “Load-Balance VM”) fails when its done using their External Interface IP or 
the IPs from the networks created with the demo stacks (i.e.  ‘protected’, 
‘unprotected’, ‘lb01_private’ or ‘pktget01_private’)I can only SSH then through 
the IP assigned by ONAP networkFurther to this, if any interface on ‘protected’ 
and ‘unprotected’ is detached from vFirewall application VM, and VM is 
restarted then SSH using external interface works!! Same happens for 
Load-Balance VM!

Is this issue seen by anyone? Any pointers to resolve this?

Thanks,
Arun


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

[FREEMAN, BRIAN D]

We usually only log in via the external IP for testing - seems strange that 
behavoir would change by detaching interfaces but we it is a VPP application so 
the protected/unprotected vNICs shouldn't really be setup for login.

Is the problem that the public key used in preload doesnt match the private.key 
you are using ?

Brian






From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Arun Arora (c)
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 9:14 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

Hi All,

While trying to create vFW and vLB/ vDNS demos I am facing the following issue 
in both demos:

  1.  For both demos able to create the stack which creates 3 VMs and their 
associated networks
 *   In vFW demo, vFirewall application VM has both 'protected' and 
'unprotected' networks configured on its interfaces
 *   In vLB/ vDNS demo, Load-Balance VM has both 'lb01_private' and 
'pktget01_private' networks configured on its interfaces
  2.  Issue: SSH on both VMs ("vFirewall application VM" and "Load-Balance VM") 
fails when its done using their External Interface IP or the IPs from the 
networks created with the demo stacks (i.e.  'protected', 'unprotected', 
'lb01_private' or 'pktget01_private')
  3.  I can only SSH then through the IP assigned by ONAP network
  4.  Further to this, if any interface on 'protected' and 'unprotected' is 
detached from vFirewall application VM, and VM is restarted then SSH using 
external interface works!! Same happens for Load-Balance VM!

Is this issue seen by anyone? Any pointers to resolve this?

Thanks,
Arun
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] VFW/vLB External Network Connect fails

[Arun Arora (c)]

Hi All,

While trying to create vFW and vLB/ vDNS demos I am facing the following issue 
in both demos:

  1.  For both demos able to create the stack which creates 3 VMs and their 
associated networks
 *   In vFW demo, vFirewall application VM has both 'protected' and 
'unprotected' networks configured on its interfaces
 *   In vLB/ vDNS demo, Load-Balance VM has both 'lb01_private' and 
'pktget01_private' networks configured on its interfaces
  2.  Issue: SSH on both VMs ("vFirewall application VM" and "Load-Balance VM") 
fails when its done using their External Interface IP or the IPs from the 
networks created with the demo stacks (i.e.  'protected', 'unprotected', 
'lb01_private' or 'pktget01_private')
  3.  I can only SSH then through the IP assigned by ONAP network
  4.  Further to this, if any interface on 'protected' and 'unprotected' is 
detached from vFirewall application VM, and VM is restarted then SSH using 
external interface works!! Same happens for Load-Balance VM!

Is this issue seen by anyone? Any pointers to resolve this?

Thanks,
Arun
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

[FREEMAN, BRIAN D]

Folks,

Just some clarity based on responses so far.

The goal is to estimate the cloud resources we will need for testing and to 
help guide the testing strategy since likely will not have enough main memory 
for all the instances we had in Amsterdam with HA and Geo.

We are assuming OOM to minimize the footprint so the VM numbers are less 
relevant.

Today in HEAT a full Amsterdam is about 300 GB of main memory (SB01) – DCAE is 
already clustered

If we go with HA/Clustering that becomes “roughly”  600 GB (assuming DCAE is 
bulk of current memory utilization)  for one site and 1.2 TB for two sites but 
not all components need to scale the same way and there is  efficiency with OOM.

To the extent you can assess the memory you need in OOM with clustering that 
would be really helpful.

Brian



From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:31 PM
To: TIMONEY, DAN ; onap-release 
Cc: onap-discuss ; FREEMAN, BRIAN D 

Subject: RE: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Thanks Dan for your prompt feedback.
Good point. I would suggest you add this point as a comment and we will take it 
from there.

Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287

From: TIMONEY, DAN [mailto:dt5...@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1:56 PM
To: Gildas Lanilis 
>; onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>; FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D >
Subject: Re: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Gildas,

This is an excellent topic – thanks for starting this discussion!

One suggestion – we might want to separate out the HA/Geo Redundancy columns 
into 2 sets : one set for local HA only, and a second set for Geo Redundancy.

Just by way of example, in the case of SDN-C, we’d need 1 VM for no redundancy, 
8 for local HA, and 16 for geo redundancy.

I know that our target is geo redundancy, but it might be good to have a view 
of resources for local HA only as well.  That way, if we find we can’t afford 
the VMs for full geo redundancy, we’ll know the minimal set for local HA as 
well.

Dan

--
Dan Timoney
SDN-CP / OpenECOMP SDN-C SSO

Please go to  D2 ECOMP Release Planning 
Wiki for 
D2 ECOMP Project In-take, 2016 Release Planning, Change Management, and find 
key Release Planning Contact Information.


From: 
>
 on behalf of Gildas Lanilis 
>
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 3:31 PM
To: onap-release 
>
Cc: onap-discuss 
>, "FREEMAN, 
BRIAN D" >
Subject: [Onap-release] ACTION REQUIRED: Estimating LAB resource needs

Hi PTLs,

We need your help.
We are working with Catherine, Helen and Brian on estimating the needs in term 
of Integration Lab resources for Beijing Release. This is important as it will 
most certainly impact $ budget and thus may require TSC and GB approval.
The details have been posted in the wiki at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+labs+need+for+Beijing
 and we need every team to fill out the table.

Please let my Catherine, Helen, Brian and Brian know if you have any questions.

It will be greatly appreciated if the table could be filled out by Monday, Dec 
4.

Thanks,
Gildas

[uaweiLogowithName]
Gildas Lanilis
ONAP Release Manager
Santa Clara CA, USA
gildas.lani...@huawei.com
Mobile: 1 415 238 6287

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [aai] AAI weekly meeting cancelled this week

[FORSYTH, JAMES]

All,

The ONAP TSC call was moved an hour earlier so AAI's normal Thursday @ 9 AM 
US/Eastern has been cancelled.  I am not 100% sure what our new time slot will 
be, but we will cover AAI business tomorrow after the special model 
visualization meeting @ 10 AM US/Eastern.

Thanks,
jimmy
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] APPC code compile fail

[Gaoweitao (Victor, MANO)]

Hi APPC Team,
I download the APPC code of Amsterdam branch, but when I try to 
compile appc code, it reports fail due to parent pom.

[INFO] Scanning for projects...
Downloading: 
https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/public/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/releases/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/public/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/staging/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
Downloading: 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/onap/ccsdk/parent/odlparent-carbon-sr1/0.1.0/odlparent-carbon-sr1-0.1.0.pom
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR]   The project org.openecomp.appc:appc:1.2.1-SNAPSHOT (E: 
\APPC\appc\pom.xml) has 1 error
[ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not transfer artifact 
org.onap.ccsdk.parent:odlparent-carbon-sr1:pom:0.1.0 from/to openecomp-release 
(https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/releases/): Error transferring 
file: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: 
sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find 
valid certification path to requested target and 'parent.relativePath' points 
at wrong local POM @ line 27, column 13 -> [Help 2]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e 
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please 
read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
[ERROR] [Help 2] 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/UnresolvableModelException

Can anyone help me check this?

BR
Victor
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [uui] How to access Usecase UI

[Kanagaraj Manickam]

Hi Tao,

Thank you.
I installed ONAP Amsterdam release and health status are reporting success. So 
I believe, dependent components are running properly.

I referred the readthedocs and could not find much details on how to use this 
UUI. Can you please share more details. Thanks.

Regards
Kanagaraj M

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***

From: shentao [mailto:shen...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 3:43 PM
To: Kanagaraj Manickam; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: 答复: [onap-discuss] [uui] How to access Usecase UI

Hi, Kanagaraj

If you are going to use onap-portal to access UUI, you’d better add UUI portal 
by Application Onboarding.
The URL is http://$UUI_VM_IP/iui/usecaseui

Of course you can access UUI portal simply via URL 
http://$UUI_VM_IP:8080/iui/usecaseui
By the way, MSB and DmaaP should been installed in your environment because UUI 
is working based on these two components.

Best regards,
Tao


发件人: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] 代表 Kanagaraj Manickam
发送时间: 2017年11月30日 16:29
收件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
主题: [onap-discuss] [uui] How to access Usecase UI

Hi UUI Team,

I have installed mult-service vm as part of HEAT based ONAP installation and 
UUI got installed successfully.
Now I am looking for how to access the UUI portal. Kindly help. Thanks.

Regards
Kanagaraj M

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [E] Re: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

[Kumar Skand Priya, Viswanath V via onap-discuss]

We are also stuck in same error. Is there anyway to standup devKit in
dockerized mode ( primarily using docker compose ) as opposed to struggling
with vagrant onap ?

BR,
Viswa




Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya
Architect
Verizon Network Ops & Eng


On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:40 PM,  wrote:

> Done it, but there is still the same error
>
>
>
> *De :* Moshe Hoadley [mailto:moshe.hoad...@amdocs.com]
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 30 novembre 2017 12:02
>
> *À :* JEZEQUEL Mickael IMT/OLN; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Objet :* RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution
>
>
>
> Under the devkit folder, try to run:
>
> ./bin/vvp-install-box
>
> (you may need to chmod +x  first)
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Moshe Hoadley
>
> *(* 972-9-77-62712
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]
>
>
>
> *From:* mickael.jezeq...@orange.com [mailto:mickael.jezeq...@orange.com
> ]
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:44 PM
> *To:* Moshe Hoadley ;
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for your answer.
>
>
>
> I have already tried it. The ovf file is then correctly parsed, but it
> failed just after, complaining that the vmdk file is missing:
>
>
>
> VBoxManage: error: Appliance import failed
>
> VBoxManage: error: Error opening '/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/
> vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/vvp_empty_vagrant_image.vmdk' for reading
> (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Moshe Hoadley [mailto:moshe.hoad...@amdocs.com
> ]
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 30 novembre 2017 11:23
> *À :* JEZEQUEL Mickael IMT/OLN; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Objet :* RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> For Item #3, remove the copyright lines from the beginning of the
> ‘box.ovf’ file it is not legal xml syntax.
>
> I’m also stuck on items 1 and 2
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Moshe Hoadley
>
> *(* 972-9-77-62712
>
> [image: cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org ] *On Behalf Of *
> mickael.jezeq...@orange.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 30, 2017 11:40 AM
> *To:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> *Subject:* [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution
>
>
>
> Hi everyone ,
>
>
>
> I'm trying to run the vvp project , but I’m facing several pb during the 
> setup:
>
>
>
> 1) Vagrant is stucked during “vagrant up” during ops-01 network 
> configuration.
>
> The last log lines are:
>
> ==> ops-01: Machine booted and ready!
>
> ==> ops-01: Configuring and enabling network interfaces...
>
>
>
> I have found a temporary  workaround by commenting the following line in
> Vagrantfile:
>
> :nic_type => "virtio",
>
>
>
> Does anyone know the reason of this behavior ?
>
>
>
>
>
> 2) With the previous modification, the vagrant setup is fine for
> ops-01, but ceph-01 setup get stucked during  the ansible configuration :
>
>
>
> TASK [ceph.ceph-rgw : is ceph running already?]
> 
>
> [DEPRECATION WARNING]: always_run is deprecated. Use check_mode = no
> instead..
>
>
>
> This feature will be removed in version 2.4. Deprecation warnings can be
>
> disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.
>
>
>
>
>
> when I tried to execute manually  the blocking command on the ceph-01 vm,
> I got the following error:
>
> ceph --connect-timeout 3 --cluster ceph fsid
>
> 2017-11-30 08:50:08.398284 7ff725444700 -1 auth: unable to find a keyring
> on /etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring,/etc/ceph/ceph.
> keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring.bin: (2) No such file or
> directory
>
>
>
>
>
> 3) core-os1  setup fails right at the beginning:
>
>
>
> ==> coreos-01: Importing base box 'vvp-empty'...
>
> There was an error while executing `VBoxManage`, a CLI used by Vagrant
>
> for controlling VirtualBox. The command and stderr is shown below.
>
>
>
> Command: ["import", "-n", 
> "/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf"]
>
>
>
> Stderr: 0%...
>
> Progress state: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR
>
> VBoxManage: error: Appliance read failed
>
> VBoxManage: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found.
>
> VBoxManage: error: Location: 
> '/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf', line 1 (0), 
> column 1
>
> VBoxManage: error: Details: code VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80bb0004), component 
> ApplianceWrap, interface IAppliance
>
> VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleImportAppliance(HandlerArg*)" 
> at line 307 of file VboxManageAppliance.cpp
>
>
>
>
>
> My environment is  Ubuntu 17.04
>
> with vagrant 2.0.1, virtualbox  5.2.2 and ansible 2.2.1.0
>
>
>
> Am I missing anything ? . Can anyone help in this issue?.
>
>
>
> [image: logo Orange]
> 

Re: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

[mickael.jezequel]

Done it, but there is still the same error

De : Moshe Hoadley [mailto:moshe.hoad...@amdocs.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 novembre 2017 12:02
À : JEZEQUEL Mickael IMT/OLN; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Objet : RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Under the devkit folder, try to run:
./bin/vvp-install-box
(you may need to chmod +x  first)

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: mickael.jezeq...@orange.com 
[mailto:mickael.jezeq...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:44 PM
To: Moshe Hoadley >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Thank you very much for your answer.

I have already tried it. The ovf file is then correctly parsed, but it failed 
just after, complaining that the vmdk file is missing:

VBoxManage: error: Appliance import failed
VBoxManage: error: Error opening 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/vvp_empty_vagrant_image.vmdk' 
for reading (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)



De : Moshe Hoadley [mailto:moshe.hoad...@amdocs.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 novembre 2017 11:23
À : JEZEQUEL Mickael IMT/OLN; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Objet : RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi
For Item #3, remove the copyright lines from the beginning of the 'box.ovf' 
file it is not legal xml syntax.
I'm also stuck on items 1 and 2

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
mickael.jezeq...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 11:40 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi everyone ,


I'm trying to run the vvp project , but I'm facing several pb during the setup:



1) Vagrant is stucked during "vagrant up" during ops-01 network 
configuration.

The last log lines are:

==> ops-01: Machine booted and ready!

==> ops-01: Configuring and enabling network interfaces...


I have found a temporary  workaround by commenting the following line in 
Vagrantfile:

:nic_type => "virtio",

Does anyone know the reason of this behavior ?



2) With the previous modification, the vagrant setup is fine for ops-01, 
but ceph-01 setup get stucked during  the ansible configuration :


TASK [ceph.ceph-rgw : is ceph running already?] 

[DEPRECATION WARNING]: always_run is deprecated. Use check_mode = no instead..



This feature will be removed in version 2.4. Deprecation warnings can be

disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.


when I tried to execute manually  the blocking command on the ceph-01 vm, I got 
the following error:

ceph --connect-timeout 3 --cluster ceph fsid

2017-11-30 08:50:08.398284 7ff725444700 -1 auth: unable to find a keyring on 
/etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring,/etc/ceph/ceph.keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring.bin:
 (2) No such file or directory



3) core-os1  setup fails right at the beginning:


==> coreos-01: Importing base box 'vvp-empty'...

There was an error while executing `VBoxManage`, a CLI used by Vagrant

for controlling VirtualBox. The command and stderr is shown below.



Command: ["import", "-n", 
"/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf"]



Stderr: 0%...

Progress state: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR

VBoxManage: error: Appliance read failed

VBoxManage: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found.

VBoxManage: error: Location: 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf', line 1 (0), column 1

VBoxManage: error: Details: code VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80bb0004), component 
ApplianceWrap, interface IAppliance

VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleImportAppliance(HandlerArg*)" at 
line 307 of file VboxManageAppliance.cpp



My environment is  Ubuntu 17.04

with vagrant 2.0.1, virtualbox  5.2.2 and ansible 2.2.1.0


Am I missing anything ? . Can anyone help in this issue?.

[logo Orange]

Mickael Jezequel


_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 

Re: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

[Moshe Hoadley]

Under the devkit folder, try to run:
./bin/vvp-install-box
(you may need to chmod +x  first)

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: mickael.jezeq...@orange.com [mailto:mickael.jezeq...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:44 PM
To: Moshe Hoadley ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Thank you very much for your answer.

I have already tried it. The ovf file is then correctly parsed, but it failed 
just after, complaining that the vmdk file is missing:

VBoxManage: error: Appliance import failed
VBoxManage: error: Error opening 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/vvp_empty_vagrant_image.vmdk' 
for reading (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)



De : Moshe Hoadley [mailto:moshe.hoad...@amdocs.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 novembre 2017 11:23
À : JEZEQUEL Mickael IMT/OLN; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Objet : RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi
For Item #3, remove the copyright lines from the beginning of the 'box.ovf' 
file it is not legal xml syntax.
I'm also stuck on items 1 and 2

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
mickael.jezeq...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 11:40 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi everyone ,


I'm trying to run the vvp project , but I'm facing several pb during the setup:



1) Vagrant is stucked during "vagrant up" during ops-01 network 
configuration.

The last log lines are:

==> ops-01: Machine booted and ready!

==> ops-01: Configuring and enabling network interfaces...


I have found a temporary  workaround by commenting the following line in 
Vagrantfile:

:nic_type => "virtio",

Does anyone know the reason of this behavior ?



2) With the previous modification, the vagrant setup is fine for ops-01, 
but ceph-01 setup get stucked during  the ansible configuration :


TASK [ceph.ceph-rgw : is ceph running already?] 

[DEPRECATION WARNING]: always_run is deprecated. Use check_mode = no instead..



This feature will be removed in version 2.4. Deprecation warnings can be

disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.


when I tried to execute manually  the blocking command on the ceph-01 vm, I got 
the following error:

ceph --connect-timeout 3 --cluster ceph fsid

2017-11-30 08:50:08.398284 7ff725444700 -1 auth: unable to find a keyring on 
/etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring,/etc/ceph/ceph.keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring.bin:
 (2) No such file or directory



3) core-os1  setup fails right at the beginning:


==> coreos-01: Importing base box 'vvp-empty'...

There was an error while executing `VBoxManage`, a CLI used by Vagrant

for controlling VirtualBox. The command and stderr is shown below.



Command: ["import", "-n", 
"/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf"]



Stderr: 0%...

Progress state: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR

VBoxManage: error: Appliance read failed

VBoxManage: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found.

VBoxManage: error: Location: 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf', line 1 (0), column 1

VBoxManage: error: Details: code VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80bb0004), component 
ApplianceWrap, interface IAppliance

VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleImportAppliance(HandlerArg*)" at 
line 307 of file VboxManageAppliance.cpp



My environment is  Ubuntu 17.04

with vagrant 2.0.1, virtualbox  5.2.2 and ansible 2.2.1.0


Am I missing anything ? . Can anyone help in this issue?.

[logo Orange]

Mickael Jezequel


_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
This message 

Re: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

[Moshe Hoadley]

Under the devkit folder, try to run:
./bin/vvp-install-box
(you may need to chmod +x  first)

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: mickael.jezeq...@orange.com [mailto:mickael.jezeq...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 12:44 PM
To: Moshe Hoadley ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Thank you very much for your answer.

I have already tried it. The ovf file is then correctly parsed, but it failed 
just after, complaining that the vmdk file is missing:

VBoxManage: error: Appliance import failed
VBoxManage: error: Error opening 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/vvp_empty_vagrant_image.vmdk' 
for reading (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)



De : Moshe Hoadley [mailto:moshe.hoad...@amdocs.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 novembre 2017 11:23
À : JEZEQUEL Mickael IMT/OLN; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Objet : RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi
For Item #3, remove the copyright lines from the beginning of the 'box.ovf' 
file it is not legal xml syntax.
I'm also stuck on items 1 and 2

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
mickael.jezeq...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 11:40 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi everyone ,


I'm trying to run the vvp project , but I'm facing several pb during the setup:



1) Vagrant is stucked during "vagrant up" during ops-01 network 
configuration.

The last log lines are:

==> ops-01: Machine booted and ready!

==> ops-01: Configuring and enabling network interfaces...


I have found a temporary  workaround by commenting the following line in 
Vagrantfile:

:nic_type => "virtio",

Does anyone know the reason of this behavior ?



2) With the previous modification, the vagrant setup is fine for ops-01, 
but ceph-01 setup get stucked during  the ansible configuration :


TASK [ceph.ceph-rgw : is ceph running already?] 

[DEPRECATION WARNING]: always_run is deprecated. Use check_mode = no instead..



This feature will be removed in version 2.4. Deprecation warnings can be

disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.


when I tried to execute manually  the blocking command on the ceph-01 vm, I got 
the following error:

ceph --connect-timeout 3 --cluster ceph fsid

2017-11-30 08:50:08.398284 7ff725444700 -1 auth: unable to find a keyring on 
/etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring,/etc/ceph/ceph.keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring.bin:
 (2) No such file or directory



3) core-os1  setup fails right at the beginning:


==> coreos-01: Importing base box 'vvp-empty'...

There was an error while executing `VBoxManage`, a CLI used by Vagrant

for controlling VirtualBox. The command and stderr is shown below.



Command: ["import", "-n", 
"/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf"]



Stderr: 0%...

Progress state: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR

VBoxManage: error: Appliance read failed

VBoxManage: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found.

VBoxManage: error: Location: 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf', line 1 (0), column 1

VBoxManage: error: Details: code VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80bb0004), component 
ApplianceWrap, interface IAppliance

VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleImportAppliance(HandlerArg*)" at 
line 307 of file VboxManageAppliance.cpp



My environment is  Ubuntu 17.04

with vagrant 2.0.1, virtualbox  5.2.2 and ansible 2.2.1.0


Am I missing anything ? . Can anyone help in this issue?.

[logo Orange]

Mickael Jezequel


_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
This message 

Re: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

[mickael.jezequel]

Thank you very much for your answer.

I have already tried it. The ovf file is then correctly parsed, but it failed 
just after, complaining that the vmdk file is missing:

VBoxManage: error: Appliance import failed
VBoxManage: error: Error opening 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/vvp_empty_vagrant_image.vmdk' 
for reading (VERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)



De : Moshe Hoadley [mailto:moshe.hoad...@amdocs.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 30 novembre 2017 11:23
À : JEZEQUEL Mickael IMT/OLN; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Objet : RE: [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi
For Item #3, remove the copyright lines from the beginning of the 'box.ovf' 
file it is not legal xml syntax.
I'm also stuck on items 1 and 2

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
mickael.jezeq...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 11:40 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi everyone ,


I'm trying to run the vvp project , but I'm facing several pb during the setup:



1) Vagrant is stucked during "vagrant up" during ops-01 network 
configuration.

The last log lines are:

==> ops-01: Machine booted and ready!

==> ops-01: Configuring and enabling network interfaces...


I have found a temporary  workaround by commenting the following line in 
Vagrantfile:

:nic_type => "virtio",

Does anyone know the reason of this behavior ?



2) With the previous modification, the vagrant setup is fine for ops-01, 
but ceph-01 setup get stucked during  the ansible configuration :


TASK [ceph.ceph-rgw : is ceph running already?] 

[DEPRECATION WARNING]: always_run is deprecated. Use check_mode = no instead..



This feature will be removed in version 2.4. Deprecation warnings can be

disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.


when I tried to execute manually  the blocking command on the ceph-01 vm, I got 
the following error:

ceph --connect-timeout 3 --cluster ceph fsid

2017-11-30 08:50:08.398284 7ff725444700 -1 auth: unable to find a keyring on 
/etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring,/etc/ceph/ceph.keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring.bin:
 (2) No such file or directory



3) core-os1  setup fails right at the beginning:


==> coreos-01: Importing base box 'vvp-empty'...

There was an error while executing `VBoxManage`, a CLI used by Vagrant

for controlling VirtualBox. The command and stderr is shown below.



Command: ["import", "-n", 
"/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf"]



Stderr: 0%...

Progress state: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR

VBoxManage: error: Appliance read failed

VBoxManage: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found.

VBoxManage: error: Location: 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf', line 1 (0), column 1

VBoxManage: error: Details: code VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80bb0004), component 
ApplianceWrap, interface IAppliance

VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleImportAppliance(HandlerArg*)" at 
line 307 of file VboxManageAppliance.cpp



My environment is  Ubuntu 17.04

with vagrant 2.0.1, virtualbox  5.2.2 and ansible 2.2.1.0


Am I missing anything ? . Can anyone help in this issue?.

[logo Orange]

Mickael Jezequel



_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou 

Re: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

[Moshe Hoadley]

Hi
For Item #3, remove the copyright lines from the beginning of the 'box.ovf' 
file it is not legal xml syntax.
I'm also stuck on items 1 and 2

Thanks
Moshe Hoadley
* 972-9-77-62712
[cid:image001.png@01D2F989.346CD870]

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
mickael.jezeq...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 11:40 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

Hi everyone ,


I'm trying to run the vvp project , but I'm facing several pb during the setup:



1) Vagrant is stucked during "vagrant up" during ops-01 network 
configuration.

The last log lines are:

==> ops-01: Machine booted and ready!

==> ops-01: Configuring and enabling network interfaces...


I have found a temporary  workaround by commenting the following line in 
Vagrantfile:

:nic_type => "virtio",

Does anyone know the reason of this behavior ?



2) With the previous modification, the vagrant setup is fine for ops-01, 
but ceph-01 setup get stucked during  the ansible configuration :


TASK [ceph.ceph-rgw : is ceph running already?] 

[DEPRECATION WARNING]: always_run is deprecated. Use check_mode = no instead..



This feature will be removed in version 2.4. Deprecation warnings can be

disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.


when I tried to execute manually  the blocking command on the ceph-01 vm, I got 
the following error:

ceph --connect-timeout 3 --cluster ceph fsid

2017-11-30 08:50:08.398284 7ff725444700 -1 auth: unable to find a keyring on 
/etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring,/etc/ceph/ceph.keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring.bin:
 (2) No such file or directory



3) core-os1  setup fails right at the beginning:


==> coreos-01: Importing base box 'vvp-empty'...

There was an error while executing `VBoxManage`, a CLI used by Vagrant

for controlling VirtualBox. The command and stderr is shown below.



Command: ["import", "-n", 
"/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf"]



Stderr: 0%...

Progress state: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR

VBoxManage: error: Appliance read failed

VBoxManage: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found.

VBoxManage: error: Location: 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf', line 1 (0), column 1

VBoxManage: error: Details: code VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80bb0004), component 
ApplianceWrap, interface IAppliance

VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleImportAppliance(HandlerArg*)" at 
line 307 of file VboxManageAppliance.cpp



My environment is  Ubuntu 17.04

with vagrant 2.0.1, virtualbox  5.2.2 and ansible 2.2.1.0


Am I missing anything ? . Can anyone help in this issue?.

[logo Orange]

Mickael Jezequel




_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] 答复: [uui] How to access Usecase UI

[shentao]

Hi, Kanagaraj

 

If you are going to use onap-portal to access UUI, you’d better add UUI
portal by Application Onboarding.

The URL is http://$UUI_VM_IP/iui/usecaseui

 

Of course you can access UUI portal simply via URL
http://$UUI_VM_IP:8080/iui/usecaseui

By the way, MSB and DmaaP should been installed in your environment because
UUI is working based on these two components.

 

Best regards,

Tao

 

 

发件人: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] 代表 Kanagaraj Manickam
发送时间: 2017年11月30日 16:29
收件人: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
主题: [onap-discuss] [uui] How to access Usecase UI

 

Hi UUI Team,

 

I have installed mult-service vm as part of HEAT based ONAP installation and
UUI got installed successfully. 

Now I am looking for how to access the UUI portal. Kindly help. Thanks.

 

Regards

Kanagaraj M

 


***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群
组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散
发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本
邮件！

**


***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is
listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way
(including, but not   limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction,
or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it!

***

 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [vvp] devkit: errors during vagrant up execution

[mickael.jezequel]

Hi everyone ,


I'm trying to run the vvp project , but I'm facing several pb during the setup:



1)Vagrant is stucked during "vagrant up" during ops-01 network 
configuration.

The last log lines are:

==> ops-01: Machine booted and ready!

==> ops-01: Configuring and enabling network interfaces...


I have found a temporary  workaround by commenting the following line in 
Vagrantfile:

:nic_type => "virtio",

Does anyone know the reason of this behavior ?



2)With the previous modification, the vagrant setup is fine for ops-01, but 
ceph-01 setup get stucked during  the ansible configuration :


TASK [ceph.ceph-rgw : is ceph running already?] 

[DEPRECATION WARNING]: always_run is deprecated. Use check_mode = no instead..



This feature will be removed in version 2.4. Deprecation warnings can be

disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.


when I tried to execute manually  the blocking command on the ceph-01 vm, I got 
the following error:

ceph --connect-timeout 3 --cluster ceph fsid

2017-11-30 08:50:08.398284 7ff725444700 -1 auth: unable to find a keyring on 
/etc/ceph/ceph.client.admin.keyring,/etc/ceph/ceph.keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring,/etc/ceph/keyring.bin:
 (2) No such file or directory



3) core-os1  setup fails right at the beginning:


==> coreos-01: Importing base box 'vvp-empty'...

There was an error while executing `VBoxManage`, a CLI used by Vagrant

for controlling VirtualBox. The command and stderr is shown below.



Command: ["import", "-n", 
"/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf"]



Stderr: 0%...

Progress state: VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR

VBoxManage: error: Appliance read failed

VBoxManage: error: Start tag expected, '<' not found.

VBoxManage: error: Location: 
'/home/mj/.vagrant.d/boxes/vvp-empty/0/virtualbox/box.ovf', line 1 (0), column 1

VBoxManage: error: Details: code VBOX_E_FILE_ERROR (0x80bb0004), component 
ApplianceWrap, interface IAppliance

VBoxManage: error: Context: "RTEXITCODE handleImportAppliance(HandlerArg*)" at 
line 307 of file VboxManageAppliance.cpp



My environment is  Ubuntu 17.04

with vagrant 2.0.1, virtualbox  5.2.2 and ansible 2.2.1.0


Am I missing anything ? . Can anyone help in this issue?.

[logo Orange]

Mickael Jezequel





_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Get errors when deploying AAI via OOM

[zhao.huabing]

Hi,






I got the below errors when deploying AAI via OOM.


./createAll.bash -a aai -n onap


kubectl get pods -n onap-aai






elasticsearch-622738319-71vjg   0/1   rpc error: code = 2 desc = 
failed to start container 
"698a9bc2989c227a34b91018fe0f840b2f293bcb9daceb50ec36c7550308374e": Error 
response from daemon: {"message":"invalid header field value \"oci runtime 
error: container_linux.go:247: starting container process caused 
\\\"process_linux.go:359: container init caused \\\"rootfs_linux.go:53: 
mounting 
\\\"/dockerdata-nfs/onap/aai/elasticsearch/config/elasticsearch.yml\\\"
 to rootfs 
\\\"/var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/d24d0f3bbefe3274713a8b518ef22382af64e379f5dfff823197792d7a226821\\\"
 at 
\\\"/var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/d24d0f3bbefe3274713a8b518ef22382af64e379f5dfff823197792d7a226821/usr/share/elasticsearch/config/elasticsearch.yml\\\"
 caused \\\"not a directory\\\"\\\"\\\"\\n\""}


 



sparky-be-1292339831-ncldx  0/2   rpc error: code = 2 desc = 
failed to start container 
"c6574fe2e3fd7544234e97b24aadd46a613be2be348c4273edd68962102cfa2c": Error 
response from daemon: {"message":"invalid header field value \"oci runtime 
error: container_linux.go:247: starting container process caused 
\\\"process_linux.go:359: container init caused \\\"rootfs_linux.go:53: 
mounting 
\\\"/dockerdata-nfs/onap/log/filebeat/log4j/filebeat.yml\\\"
 to rootfs 
\\\"/var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/a9bbf536908afe8eab4aa9cfda6bd3bbb1e4b9d62ac1a1b2a50a7e4487f1b12a\\\"
 at 
\\\"/var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/a9bbf536908afe8eab4aa9cfda6bd3bbb1e4b9d62ac1a1b2a50a7e4487f1b12a/usr/share/filebeat/filebeat.yml\\\"
 caused \\\"not a directory\\\"\\\"\\\"\\n\""}  






Any idea?







Thanks,


Huabing___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [uui] How to access Usecase UI

[Kanagaraj Manickam]

Hi UUI Team,

I have installed mult-service vm as part of HEAT based ONAP installation and 
UUI got installed successfully.
Now I am looking for how to access the UUI portal. Kindly help. Thanks.

Regards
Kanagaraj M

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss