Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] CII Badging Attention PTL 

Hi Tony, Steve, Thanks for the explanation, it really helped. One more question, do you happend to know how could I submit all the repos together if I want to apply at project level? The below screenshot show that only one repo can be submitted per project. I tried to contact Core

Re: [onap-discuss] [**EXTERNAL**] Service distribution error on latest ONAP/OOM

Hi Alexis, I am still getting the Policy Exception error POL5000 with dcae disabled, (dcaegen2 app not running as mentioned earlier). I am on the latest OOM for amsterdam (policy images are 1.1.3 as verified). Service distribution immediately fails. policy pod logs don't indicate

Re: [onap-discuss] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Demo update-vfw policy script when running without closed loop

I am running 1.1.1 OOM. With the update to /dockerdata-nfs push-policy script change suggested by Marco to pull from amsterdam, it didn't work with 1.1. ( ?h=amsterdam change) I still see the GET error on update policy run after restarting the policy pods, confirming policy script was

[onap-discuss] OOM new reference versions: Kubectl client 1.9.2, Kubernetes (server 1.8.5) via Rancher 1.6.14, Helm 2.8.0 and Docker 17.03.2-ce

Team, The following configuration is verified and an increase for all Kubernetes client/server, Rancher, Helm client/server and Docker versions https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-535 Kubectl 1.9.2 - up from 1.8.6 - our secret generation issue

Re: [onap-discuss] Demo update-vfw policy script when running without closed loop

Finish testing, it does fix the issue. Thanks, Alexis > On Jan 25, 2018, at 2:28 PM, Alexis de Talhouët > wrote: > > Just put up a fix for this: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/29209/ > Trying it now. > >> On Jan 25, 2018, at 2:13

Re: [onap-discuss] Demo update-vfw policy script when running without closed loop

Just put up a fix for this: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/29209/ Trying it now. > On Jan 25, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Alexis de Talhouët > wrote: > > This is tracked by https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-611 > > > Currently, OOM uses

Re: [onap-discuss] Demo update-vfw policy script when running without closed loop

This is tracked by https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-611 Currently, OOM uses 1.1.1 Alexis > On Jan 25, 2018, at 2:07 PM, HERNANDEZ-HERRERO, JORGE wrote: > > Hi Karthick, > With regards to policy, cannot tell you in the context of kubernetes, but we > had a bug introduced in

Re: [onap-discuss] Demo update-vfw policy script when running without closed loop

Hi Karthick, With regards to policy, cannot tell you in the context of kubernetes, but we had a bug introduced in v1.1.2 policy docker images that was resolved with v1.1.3. The error shown in the text below indicates that the automated deployment of operational policies wasn't successful

Re: [onap-discuss] Demo update-vfw policy script when running without closed loop

Karthick, Please look for BRMS_DEPENDENCY_VERSION at the end of ${OOM_HOME}/kubernetes/config/docker/init/src/config/policy/opt/policy/config/pe/brmsgw.conf. That parameter should be the same as the Policy container version number. For Amsterdam, it has to be either 1.1.1 or 1.1.3, depending

Re: [onap-discuss] [**EXTERNAL**] Service distribution error on latest ONAP/OOM

Thanks Alexis. Fix is looking good but I haven't moved up yet. Will do later. Regards, -Karthick From: Alexis de Talhouët Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 8:55:06 AM To: Ramanarayanan, Karthick Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org;

[onap-discuss] Demo update-vfw policy script when running without closed loop

Hi, In my kubernetes setup minus dcae (just vFW without closed loop), I am trying to mount the appc packetgen interface but I am unable to see the mounts in appc mounts list. The policy that was pushed used the kubernetes update-vfw-op-policy.sh script which seems to be applicable for

Re: [onap-discuss] Invitation: 5G Use Case Team Meeting @ Weekly from 8am to 9am on Thursday from Thu Jan 4 to Thu Dec 13 (PST) (onap-discuss@lists.onap.org)

Thank you Ben, Sigmar, the presentation today was very informative! Here are some notes I took on the impact to ONAP. Hopefully * Both RAN and Core NFs are “tracking area aware”. And a slice must be “consistently configured” throughout a tracking area. It inadvisable (or impossible?)

[onap-discuss] [dmaap] l2 resiliency side effects on clients?

Hello DMaaPers, I understand that DMaaP will be L2 resilient in Beijing. Are there any side effects known at this time, for REST clients using the polling consumer APIs? Thank you. Jorge ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

[onap-discuss] Invitation: [onap-arc] Architecture Subcommittee @ Tue Jan 30, 2018 7am - 9am (PST) (onap-discuss@lists.onap.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/Los_Angeles X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Los_Angeles BEGIN:DAYLIGHT TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 TZNAME:PDT DTSTART:19700308T02

Re: [onap-discuss] [OpenLab] OOM deployment results

Gary, Here is the fix for the service-change-handler issue in DCAE: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/29193/ You can edit those directly in the /dockerdata-nfs/onap/dcagen2/nginx/config instead of re-deploying. Once done, go in the dcaedokp00

[onap-discuss] (SOLVED) DCAE bootstrap - Connection timed out err in boot container installer script

Well, hard to debug and find .. it was the security group for the first DCAE machine spawned by the bootstrap VM. Why do DCAE server use a different security group as the other VMs? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Josef Reisinger IBM Deutschland GmbH / Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] CII Badging Attention PTL

As PTL, it’s your choice. You can do a single report for your entire project, or you can file a separate report for each repo. If your repos use different languages or different testing procedures, you probably would find it easier to do it per-repo. If you do file one report for the entire

Re: [onap-discuss] [OpenLab] DNS Designate zone for simpledemo.onap.org

Yes, and this is what I’ve done: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/29063/ :) It’s working ok now, each deployment will create two zones $ openstack zone list +--+-+-++++ | id

Re: [onap-discuss] [OpenLab] OOM deployment results

Thanks Gary, I have the same result in the OpenLab for the OOM tenant. I’ll dig up the service-change-handler issue. Usually this is happening when it cannot connect to DMAAP. UUI is broken since a little bit in OOM, I’ve noticed this but haven’t looked into it. Alexis > On Jan 24, 2018, at

[onap-discuss] Did You Know?

[cid:image002.png@01D395D7.784680B0] Did You Know? OOM allows for rolling upgrades of component containers OOM uses Helm K8S package manager to deploy ONAP components. Each component is arranged in a packaging format called a chart - a collection of files that describe a set of k8s resources.