their own
space for their community to talk.
Ed
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Andrew Grimberg <
agrimberg at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 09:46 AM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> > Josef,
> >
> > I couldn't agree more. Typically 'discuss' in most communitie
;
>
>
> If we want to create project-specific lists, I recommend that the LF work
> on the two supporting infra capabilities above, or include workarounds such
> as above in developer intros/FAQs.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan | AT
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-
nstead on
>>> progressing on ONAP.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> *From: *Ash Young
>>> *Subject: **Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] ???Re: Modelling discussion
>>> on Friday May 5th*
>>> *Date: *April 24, 2017 at 10:09:22 AM PDT
>
tween TOSCA NFV and Tacker project, an
> iterative approach works the best - consume an available, sufficiently
> flexible data model in the implementation to validate and incorporate
> feedback based its outcome back into the data model. I say this with a huge
> respect for the model
ng it? I definitely support an agile iterative approach to all
> of this.
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
>
>> I think the most productive thing we can do is figure out ways to 'embed'
>> good modeling folks (its a very real, and distinct ski
project (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/models).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan | AT
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-bounces at lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Ed Warnicke
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 25, 2017 11:18 AM
>
I wish to nominate myself for ONAP External Open Source Community
Coordinator.
I have broad experience in Open Source Networking for over 15 years. I've
been a TSC member at OpenDaylight since its inception, am TSC Chair at fd.io.
I know people across many different Open Source Communities, many
> I know Mazin was pushing for having most proposals ready by Thu so there
> is little time left… .
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Oliver
>
> > On May 8, 2017, at 8:47 AM EDT, Ed Warnicke <hagb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I am agnostic as to which way we res
this week the latest, we need the email to
> TSC mailing list to “propose” the proposal. Is this understanding correct?
>
>
>
> Danny
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Ed Warnicke <
> hagb...@gmail.com>
> *Date:
I have seen a bunch of proposal wiki pages for projects, but only see a
small number listed in the index for such proposals:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposing+A+Project
For the folks working on proposals, would you list them there?
It allows the others who might be interested to see
One suggestion I would have would be to do a phased transition, with a
'topic' in the existing infra channels set to direct folks to lf-releng,
and a period (3 months?, 6 months?) of keeping a presence on the existing
channels, to be used to politely request bouncing conversations that arise
in
11 matches
Mail list logo
