[onap-discuss] Questions on the ONAP R2+ Resource IM

Dear Jimmy, Andy and Kevin, As discussed in the modeling call, there’re several questions regarding the resource IM that need to be answered. Please find them below: To Andy & Kevin, 1) Regarding the design time model (the figure shows the relations

Re: [onap-discuss] Questions on the ONAP R2+ Resource IM

Hi Andy, Thanks for answering the questions! Hope to see the run-time diagram soon. Best regards, Xu From: MAYER, ANDREW J [mailto:am8...@att.com] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 3:15 AM To: yangxu (H) ; FORSYTH, JAMES ; SCAGGS, KEVIN ; WECHSLER, CHESLA C Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Papyrus version

Hi Nigel, Thanks for the advice and effort for updating the tutorial video! Would you mind uploading the video to the wiki once you finish the update? Regarding the chapter vs full video, personally I prefer to have the video in chapters, it’s easier to navigate. Best regards, Xu From: onap-di

[onap-discuss] [ONAP-discuss] [modeling] VNFD UML files

Hi Brian, I’ve uploaded the papyrus files of the VNFD UML to the wiki as you requested. You can find it under: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+Contributions Or directly by the link: https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/16003450/vnfd%20uml%20diagram%20files.zip?api=v

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion meeting

Hi Kevin & Andy, I think it’s time to discuss how to start the Papyrus work and make a concrete agreement/specification for R2’s information model. Are you available at 8:00 a.m. US eastern time (9:00 p.m. Beijing time) on Thursday or Friday? Let’s have one hour discussion on this and try to add

Re: [onap-discuss] Any consensus on the two IMs proposed

Hi Jason, As agreed by the group, we'll produce Papyrus files as the final spec. A meeting has been arranged to discuss about Papyrus and try to reach consensus on the models. If you are interested, please join the call. Zoom id: 9117271979 Time: 8:00 am us eastern time, 9:00 pm Beijing time, Th

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call Feb. 1st meeting notes

Hi, Thank you all for joining the call! Here’s the meeting notes: 1) Focus on the word document for now: - Identify the parts that could be stable before M2 and try to reach consensus - Word doc format: IFA011(ETSI) like format - Process: reach consensus in meeting calls, and then move the consen

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call reminder

Hi All, This is a reminder for tomorrow’s discussion on ONAP release 2 information model. Tomorrow’s topic is VNFD top level (i.e. VNFDesc) and VDU models, we’ll try to agree on the attributes/associations of these two parts. Start Time: 8 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed Length: 1 hour Meeting

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting Notes for ONAP IM discussion call Feb 7th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! The information of the inputs can be found in the following wiki pages: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resource+IM+Discussion+Based+on+IFA011 https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Class%3A+VNFDesc For those who haven’t a chance to join, the summary is that we dis

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #2 reminder

7271979\n \n DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180208T22 DTSTAMP:20180208T110904Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180208T20 LAST-MODIFIED:20180208T111430Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang..

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #2 Feb 8th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on the VNFD top level model, I’ll try to capture them in the clean version page below: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version The discussion on the VDU part has been started and will b

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #3 invitation

oom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180209T22 DTSTAMP:20180208T151110Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180209T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180208T151139Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mai

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #4 invitation

0180211T105927Z DESCRIPTION:ONAP R2 IM discussion #4\n\nTopic: Cpd\, ExtCpd\, VduCpd\, Vdu undecided attributes\nMeeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180212T22 DTSTAMP:20180211T105821Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180212

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #3 Feb 9th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on VDU (with a few leftover attributes), SwImageDesc, VirtualComputeDesc, VirtualCpuData/VirtualCpuDesc, VirtualMemoryData/VirtualMemoryDesc, VirtualStorageDesc and LogicalNodeDesc class models, the agreements

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #5 invitation

.com CLASS:PUBLIC CREATED:20180212T142826Z DESCRIPTION:ONAP R2 IM discussion #5\n\nTopic: VduProfile\, VirtualNetworkI nterfaceRequirements\nMeeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180213T22 DTSTAMP:20180212T142804Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Meeting notes for ONAP IM discussion call #4 Feb 12th

Hi All, Thanks for joining the call! During this meeting, we finished the discussion on Cpd, ExtCpd, VduCpd and the leftovers in Vdu class. The agreements will be updated in the clean version tomorrow, the link is: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version Other issues: .

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #6 invitation

Time":20180223T23 DTSTAMP:20180222T072749Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180223T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180222T073031Z ORGANIZER;CN="yangxu (H)":mailto:yang...@huawei.com PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:6 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-cn:[onap-discuss][modeling] ONAP R2 IM d

[onap-discuss] 已取消: [modeling] ONAP R2 IM discussion #6

END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=yangxu (H):MAILTO:yang...@huawei.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-discu s...@lists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:ONAP R2 IM discussion #6\n\nTopic: Remaining cla sses and issues

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Reminder for information model related votes (Naming Convention & Meeting Time)

Hello all, There're two votes ongoing related to information model design and the deadline is approaching. If you haven't voted, please see the following wiki pages and provide your opinions. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Naming+Convention+Poll https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Meeting+Time+P

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #7 invitation

CN="'Vul, Alex'";ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:alex.vul@in tel.com CLASS:PUBLIC CREATED:20180227T193106Z DESCRIPTION:ONAP R2 IM discussion #7\n\nTopic: Remaining classes and issues for VNFD\nMeeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard T

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #8 invitation

CN="'Vul, Alex'";ROLE=OPT-PARTICIPANT;RSVP=TRUE:mailto:alex.vul@in tel.com CLASS:PUBLIC CREATED:20180228T192329Z DESCRIPTION:ONAP R2 IM discussion #8\n\nTopic: Remaining classes and issues for VNFD\nMeeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard T

[onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] Comparison of R2 proposed IM classes and IFA011

Hi Jessie, For the agreement, please look at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Design+Time+Model+Clean+Version. The differences with IFA011 are shown in orange. As for “vnfProductName”, the agreement is to have the same name as IFA011 for the time being. Best regards, Xu 发件人: onap-discuss-boun.

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #9 invitation

\, ElementGroup\, L3AddressData\, HPA\, etc.)\ nMeeting room: https://zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\n DTEND;TZID="China Standard Time":20180305T23 DTSTAMP:20180304T075613Z DTSTART;TZID="China Standard Time":20180305T21 LAST-MODIFIED:20180304T07563

[onap-discuss] [modeling] HPA poll and remaining issues

Hi All, As requested, here’s my summary for the next steps for HPA issue. I’ve created a poll page regarding whether (and how) to put certain attribute into the R2 IM. https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/HPA+Attributes+Poll Please add comments or supporting materials to that page as you wish. I hop

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Results of the two polls

Hi All, I was about to mention the results of our two polls but got not enough time to do so. 1) Naming Convention Poll (I also count in two opinions expressed in the comments): Option 1: 16 people, 6 company Option 3: 8 people, 3 company Option 1 takes the lead, and if there’re no f

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP IM discussion call #10 invitation

CREATED:20180312T095622Z DESCRIPTION:ONAP R2 IM discussion #10\n\nJust noticed the Tuesday slot is c onflict with modeling subcommittee meeting… use the Friday slot as alter native\n\nTopic: Remaining issues for VNFD (MonitoringParameter\, L3Addres sData\, HPA)\, Next Steps\nMeeting room: https:

[onap-discuss] 答复: [modeling] service modeling discussion call invitation: 9 am US eastern (9 pm Beijing) Wed, March 21

Hi Lingli, I see the upcoming call is on this Sunday (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Service+Modeling+Discusssion+Calls). May I request a slot for that discussion to state the current status of service IM and my observations? BR, Xu 发件人: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-disc

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion - Invitation

END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=yangxu (H):MAILTO:yang...@huawei.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-discu s...@lists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:Hi All\,\n\nAfter the code freeze milestone and the

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion Apr 20 - Invitation

END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=yangxu (H):MAILTO:yang...@huawei.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-discu s...@lists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:Hi All\,\n\nThis is an invitation for this week ’s

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Resource IM Discussion Apr 27 - Invitation

END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN=yangxu (H):MAILTO:yang...@huawei.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-discu s...@lists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:Hi All\,\n\nThis is an invitation for this week ’s

[onap-discuss] [modeling] About this week's resource IM call

[mailto:linuxfoundation.org_1rmtb5tpr3uc8f76fmflplo...@group.calendar.google.com] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 3:43 AM To: yangxu (H); onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Invitation: [modeling] Resource Information Model (created Apr. 25, 2... @ Weekly from 6am to 7am on Friday from Fri Apr 27 to Fri Apr 5, 2019 (PDT) (yang

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Last call for class vs data type issue

Dear All, Dear Mr. Chairman, Because I have not received any concrete comments on the class vs data type issue either on the wiki or in the call. I would like to request a last call for this issue to make progress. If there’s no comments until next Tuesday, I would like to adopt the proposal wr

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

Hi Jessie, Maybe I can help clarify this. Per the discussion of the resource IM interest group, the “obsolete” is intended to follow the definitions of the IISOMI modeling guidelines as you stated below for the time being. I think the intention of the proposal is to mark those attributes/datatyp

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM

e the proposer to discuss with Jessie to address her comments. Or we need to discuss it the next week. Best regards, Xu Yang 发件人：jessie jewitt 收件人：yangxu (H), 抄 送：denghui (L),onap-discuss@lists.onap.org,onap-tsc, 时间：2018-06-16 02:03:57 主 题：Re: [onap-discuss][modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolet