Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: Re: About workflow engine 

2017-07-24 Thread zhao.huabing
t.com> CC: <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Date: 2017/07/24 18:58 Subject: Re: [onap-discuss]答复: Re: About workflow engine Hi All We need to have the first meeting this week, let's start with a hour. I’ve created a doodle scheduling assistant here https://doodle.com/pol

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: Re: About workflow engine 

2017-07-24 Thread Zohar Sacks
Hi All We need to have the first meeting this week, let's start with a hour. I’ve created a doodle scheduling assistant here https://doodle.com/poll/zsg9i959suy7f3d7 please mark the slots of your convenience today. NOTE all times where set at UTC+3 time zone (not sure id doodle is timezone

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: Re: About workflow engine 

2017-07-20 Thread Kapeluto, Zahi
I would like to focus our discussion on design-time change management workflows (e.g., pause, upgrade etc.) and how current tooling fits into the overall SDC architecture and UX. Can I set a meeting for next Tuesday, 17:00 UTC+3? Zahi Kapeluto Lead Architect, Network Communications LOB AT

[onap-discuss] 答复: Re: About workflow engine 

2017-07-19 Thread zhang.maopeng1
Hi Zahi Yes, definite. Workflow engines have different workflow templates. If the workflow is designed by user via SDC, it will effect SDC. In my mind, some workflow is used by user, maybe some workflow is used only by the code developer as well, such as Camunda offline