[onap-discuss] 答复: RE: Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,wouldyouplease help me about it? Thank you!
Dear all, As Chengli said, we still need some inputs to instance the network connection service between DCs. The inputs may come from the network model or as the input parameters to the network instantiation action. These network model or input parameters have been defined yet? They should be defined by YANG or TOSCA? Thank you! 黄卓垚huangzhuoyao 职位position 承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept. 深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 T: +86 755 F: +86 755 M: +86 xxx E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn 原始邮件 发件人:收件人: 抄送人:黄卓垚10112215 日 期 :2017年07月27日 00:26 主 题 :RE: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,wouldyouplease help me about it? Thank you! Yes. Exactly. Brian From: Chengli Wang [mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:23 PM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Cc: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn onap-discuss@lists.onap.org TIMONEY, DAN Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,would youplease help me about it? Thank you! Brian, From your point, I think vendors should raise their input requirements , then SDNC get the parameters from somewhere and transfer them to the specific adapter via DG config node, right? Chengli On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:57 PM, FREEMAN, BRIAN D wrote: Chengli, I was thinking it would be option 2 – the adapters can be vendor specific since we will know the equipment type based on VIM inventory data as part of the DG. It would be nice to have common inputs but we have had to deal with that before on other adapters. Its two separate config nodes btw – a WAN-VendorA config node and DCGW-VendorB config node. Brian From: Chengli Wang [mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:16 AM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Cc: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn onap-discuss@lists.onap.org TIMONEY, DAN Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,would you please help me about it? Thank you! Hi Brian, As my understanding, Maybe we have two options to integrate 3rd SDN controller with SDN-C, please correct me if I am wrong. Option 1, SDN-C can define the common interfaces should be followed by vendors adaptor, then the vendors can provide their specific adaptors to translate the common interfaces to their own special ones exposed by their commercial SDN controllers. I think that is why Zhuoyao ask for your help to provide some inputs to adaptors. Is that correct, Zhuoyao? Option 2, vendors can exposed their SDN controller(local controller/WAN controller) special north bound APIs directly to SDN-C, the config node of DG inside SDN-C can invoke the APIs directly. then there is no need to do the translation in the adaptor. Also I know that no matter which one will be chosen, we still need some inputs to instance the network connection service between DCs. The inputs may come from the network model or as the input parameters to the network instantiation action. What’s your suggestion? Regards, Chengli 在 2017年7月26日,下午8:05,FREEMAN, BRIAN D 写道: +1 onap-discuss It hasnt been defined because we were waiting for input from Chengli on what API was expected to be used. We were told it would be a REST API to the vendor controller. Chengli, Could you add an example to the VoLTE wiki page like you did for the Overlay API ? Brian From: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn [mailto:huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 11:14 PM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Cc: TIMONEY, DAN bo.kai...@zte.com.cn zhang.suj...@zte.com.cn feng.j...@zte.com.cn Subject: Here is a question about SDN-C adapter, would you please help me about it? Thank you! Hi, Brian Here is a question about SDN-C adapter, would you please help me about it? Has the input of adapter responsible for underlay L3VPN between PEs been defined yet? If yes, is it based on E2E model? And how we can know more detail about it? Thank you! 黄卓垚huangzhuoyao 职位position 承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept. 深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 T: +86 755 F: +86 755 M: +86 xxx E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn
[onap-discuss] 答复: RE: Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,wouldyouplease help me about it? Thank you!
Briand, Is that means a new Jira issue about this should be raised before Funtionality Frezze August 3rd ? Thank you! 黄卓垚huangzhuoyao 职位position 承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept. 深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 T: +86 755 F: +86 755 M: +86 xxx E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn 原始邮件 发件人:收件人: 抄送人:黄卓垚10112215 日 期 :2017年07月27日 00:26 主 题 :RE: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,wouldyouplease help me about it? Thank you! Yes. Exactly. Brian From: Chengli Wang [mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:23 PM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Cc: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn onap-discuss@lists.onap.org TIMONEY, DAN Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,would youplease help me about it? Thank you! Brian, From your point, I think vendors should raise their input requirements , then SDNC get the parameters from somewhere and transfer them to the specific adapter via DG config node, right? Chengli On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:57 PM, FREEMAN, BRIAN D wrote: Chengli, I was thinking it would be option 2 – the adapters can be vendor specific since we will know the equipment type based on VIM inventory data as part of the DG. It would be nice to have common inputs but we have had to deal with that before on other adapters. Its two separate config nodes btw – a WAN-VendorA config node and DCGW-VendorB config node. Brian From: Chengli Wang [mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:16 AM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Cc: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn onap-discuss@lists.onap.org TIMONEY, DAN Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,would you please help me about it? Thank you! Hi Brian, As my understanding, Maybe we have two options to integrate 3rd SDN controller with SDN-C, please correct me if I am wrong. Option 1, SDN-C can define the common interfaces should be followed by vendors adaptor, then the vendors can provide their specific adaptors to translate the common interfaces to their own special ones exposed by their commercial SDN controllers. I think that is why Zhuoyao ask for your help to provide some inputs to adaptors. Is that correct, Zhuoyao? Option 2, vendors can exposed their SDN controller(local controller/WAN controller) special north bound APIs directly to SDN-C, the config node of DG inside SDN-C can invoke the APIs directly. then there is no need to do the translation in the adaptor. Also I know that no matter which one will be chosen, we still need some inputs to instance the network connection service between DCs. The inputs may come from the network model or as the input parameters to the network instantiation action. What’s your suggestion? Regards, Chengli 在 2017年7月26日,下午8:05,FREEMAN, BRIAN D 写道: +1 onap-discuss It hasnt been defined because we were waiting for input from Chengli on what API was expected to be used. We were told it would be a REST API to the vendor controller. Chengli, Could you add an example to the VoLTE wiki page like you did for the Overlay API ? Brian From: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn [mailto:huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 11:14 PM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Cc: TIMONEY, DAN bo.kai...@zte.com.cn zhang.suj...@zte.com.cn feng.j...@zte.com.cn Subject: Here is a question about SDN-C adapter, would you please help me about it? Thank you! Hi, Brian Here is a question about SDN-C adapter, would you please help me about it? Has the input of adapter responsible for underlay L3VPN between PEs been defined yet? If yes, is it based on E2E model? And how we can know more detail about it? Thank you! 黄卓垚huangzhuoyao 职位position 承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept. 深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 T: +86 755 F: +86 755 M: +86 xxx E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn ___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss___ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
[onap-discuss] 答复: RE: Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,wouldyouplease help me about it? Thank you!
Hi Dan, Is that necessary to raise a new Jira issue about it before Funtionality Frezze August 3rd ? Thank you! 黄卓垚huangzhuoyao 职位position 承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept. 深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 T: +86 755 F: +86 755 M: +86 xxx E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn 原始邮件 发件人:黄卓垚10112215 收件人: <bf1...@att.com> 抄送人: <wangchen...@chinamobile.com> <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> <dt5...@att.com> 日 期 :2017年07月28日 09:03 主 题 :答复: RE: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,wouldyouplease help me about it? Thank you! Briand, Is that means a new Jira issue about this should be raised before Funtionality Frezze August 3rd ? Thank you! 黄卓垚huangzhuoyao 职位position 承载网管开发部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部Strategy & IT-IT Dept. 深圳市南山区科技南路55号中兴通讯研发大楼33楼 33/F, R Building, ZTE Corporation Hi-tech Road South, Hi-tech Industrial Park Nanshan District, Shenzhen, P..R.China, 518057 T: +86 755 F: +86 755 M: +86 xxx E: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn www.zte.com.cn 发件人: <bf1...@att.com> 收件人: <wangchen...@chinamobile.com> 抄送人:黄卓垚10112215 <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> <dt5...@att.com> 日 期 :2017年07月27日 00:26 主 题 :RE: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,wouldyouplease help me about it? Thank you! Yes. Exactly. Brian From: Chengli Wang [mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:23 PM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com> Cc: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn onap-discuss@lists.onap.org TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,would youplease help me about it? Thank you! Brian, From your point, I think vendors should raise their input requirements , then SDNC get the parameters from somewhere and transfer them to the specific adapter via DG config node, right? Chengli On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:57 PM, FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com> wrote: Chengli, I was thinking it would be option 2 – the adapters can be vendor specific since we will know the equipment type based on VIM inventory data as part of the DG. It would be nice to have common inputs but we have had to deal with that before on other adapters. Its two separate config nodes btw – a WAN-VendorA config node and DCGW-VendorB config node. Brian From: Chengli Wang [mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:16 AM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com> Cc: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn onap-discuss@lists.onap.org TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Here is a question about SDN-C adapter,would you please help me about it? Thank you! Hi Brian, As my understanding, Maybe we have two options to integrate 3rd SDN controller with SDN-C, please correct me if I am wrong. Option 1, SDN-C can define the common interfaces should be followed by vendors adaptor, then the vendors can provide their specific adaptors to translate the common interfaces to their own special ones exposed by their commercial SDN controllers. I think that is why Zhuoyao ask for your help to provide some inputs to adaptors. Is that correct, Zhuoyao? Option 2, vendors can exposed their SDN controller(local controller/WAN controller) special north bound APIs directly to SDN-C, the config node of DG inside SDN-C can invoke the APIs directly. then there is no need to do the translation in the adaptor. Also I know that no matter which one will be chosen, we still need some inputs to instance the network connection service between DCs. The inputs may come from the network model or as the input parameters to the network instantiation action. What’s your suggestion? Regards, Chengli 在 2017年7月26日,下午8:05,FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com> 写道: +1 onap-discuss It hasnt been defined because we were waiting for input from Chengli on what API was expected to be used. We were told it would be a REST API to the vendor controller. Chengli, Could you add an example to the VoLTE wiki page like you did for the Overlay API ? Brian From: huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn [mailto:huang.zhuo...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 11:14 PM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com> Cc: TIMONEY, DAN <dt5...@att.com> bo.kai...@zte.com.cn zhang.suj...@zte.com.cn feng.j...@zte.com.cn Subject: Here is a question about SDN-C adapter, would you please help me about it? Thank you! Hi, Brian Here is a question about SDN-C adapter, would you plea