Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

2018-02-24 Thread denghui (L)
Hello modelers

Below page has been created:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/20180225+Progress+summary

feel free to comment if any update are needed.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2018 8:48 AM
To: Stephen Terrill ; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Steven

Your suggestion sounds reasonable, I will do wiki and send an informal email to 
the ETSI NFV list before next Monday

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:07 PM
To: denghui (L) >; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
>
Cc: Rittwik Jana >
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
>
Cc: Rittwik Jana >
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

2018-02-24 Thread denghui (L)
Hi Steven

Your suggestion sounds reasonable, I will do wiki and send an informal email to 
the ETSI NFV list before next Monday

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:07 PM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 

Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG

Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
>
Cc: Rittwik Jana >
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

2018-02-23 Thread Stephen Terrill
Hi Deng,

In the previous TSC when there was a discussion about liaisons it was pointed 
out that some work was required as there is no liaison relationship 
established, I guess that hasn't happened.  When it comes to the liaisons that 
say "please take consideration of my work" they don't mean much as the real 
work has to be driven by the work items etc by the participants there.  I 
assume that the goal of the LS is to have a place to raise the issue of 
evolution of the specs.  You could acthieve that by having a status wiki in 
modelling and a friendly informal email to the etsi lists pointing to it.

BR,

Steve

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 1:23 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss


Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI NFV ISG

2018-02-22 Thread Nguyenphu, Thinh (Nokia - US/Irving)
Hi Deng Hui,

Thank you for preparing Liaison document. My comments are the following:


  1.  What is the date for milestone 4?
  2.  The first link requires ONAP login. Thus, ETSI NFV members may not have 
the login. LS should provide public links or avoid providing one. 
https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?projectKey=MODELING=55=planning
  3.  If possible, please provide a link to ONAP use cases, per this statement 
in the LS "To fulfill the requirements of the use cases in ONAP..."
  4.  Under Action section: It would be good to provide an expected response 
date from ETSI to meet ONAP timeline.  Is March 8 is deadline?

It would be beneficial to approve the LS today TSC call, because ETSI NFV 
meeting is next week.

Regards,
Thinh


From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 6:23 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: [onap-tsc] [modeling]Liaison from ONAP modeling subcommittee to ETSI 
NFV ISG

Hello all

Based on email discussion, enclosed draft liaison from modeling subcommittee to 
ETSI NFV ISG is as the enclosed.

Thanks a lot for you review

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss