Hi Jason:
I think your proposal works fine as well. I will caution the TSC that with
a cap of one person per company, we will have a dynamic where qualified
people from our participating organizations, both operators and vendors,
will possibly choose not to run for the TSC because they don't
Thanks!
Here are the updated changes:
VVP:
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/54859/
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/54861/
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/54863/
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/54865/
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/54867/
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/54869/
Hi Jess,
Yes Steven for VVP and Hagop for vnfrqts.
Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287
-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 3:06 PM
To: sw3...@att.com
Cc: Gildas Lanilis ;
Hi Jess,
Yes Steven for VVP and Hagop for vnfrqts.
Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287
-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wagantall via RT [mailto:onap-helpd...@rt.linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 3:06 PM
To: sw3...@att.com
Cc: Gildas Lanilis ;
Team,
Just verifying that the TSC meeting is at 1445 GMT+8 (Beijing) or 0245 GMT-4
(EDT) or 2345 GMT-7 (PDT)
As several of us will shift our hours to work until 3 to 5 am Thursday
morning in NA.
https://onapcasablanca2018.sched.com/event/FCPx/tsc-meeting
Kenny there is a pending vote
Hi Gildas,
>From the email you mentioned
>"https://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/2018-June/004978.html;
I can only see both Steve and Hagop being requested, which is what my changes
are reflecting.
Did more people got approved to be added?
thanks!
Jess
On Thu Jun 14 17:44:17 2018,
Alla - previously I had access to
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/China+Telecom+Meeting+Rooms but I don't have
it.
I have now requested access to Kenny - can you please let me know what time
you would discuss the use cases - so I can be on the remote bridge?
Thanks,
- Ajay
From:
Phil,
Thanks for pulling this summary together. I think you've captured some of
the key decision points from the survey.
For Option 1, I might propose a slightly different way of handling the
voting to still strive toward the desired operator representation while
advocating meritocracy:
-
