Phil,
Thanks for pulling this summary together. I think you've captured some of
the key decision points from the survey.
For Option 1, I might propose a slightly different way of handling the
voting to still strive toward the desired operator representation while
advocating meritocracy:
- Pick a TSC size (say 15)
- Take the top 15 ranking individuals (one per company) from the voting
- Those operators not represented in the top 15 are allowed to appoint a
TSC representative for this cycle only. This would be a one-time increase
in the size of the TSC above the desired size.
The primary reason is to conduct a fully meritocratic vote for the top 15,
giving the community a sense of elected leadership. The implication could
be a larger than desired TSC for this cycle (maybe 20+) and maybe not a
full 50% operator representation. The vote would also give a feeling for
how many operators might be represented in a fully meritocractic TSC --
that way the TSC knows for the next cycle if any adjustments to TSC
composition will be required to ensure adequate operator representation.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Distinguished Engineer, IBM
Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt
From: Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org>
To: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Date: 06/14/2018 11:28 AM
Subject: [onap-tsc] ONAP TSC Composition - TSC Members, please provide
your input
Sent by: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Hello ONAP TSC Members:
Based on the survey [0] that was conducted across both the TSC members and
the ONAP developer community at-large, the following general attributes for
this election have been identified:
TSC Composition
general recommendations from the Survey
Allowed to run: Active Contributors
Allowed to vote: Active Contributors
Size of TSC: 15 to 19
Composition: Ideally, 50% (9) or more Operators
Company Cap:
*1 per company
In this election,
have reserved spots for Operators (AT&T, Bell, CMCC, China Telecom,
Orange, Reliance Jio, Turk Telecom, Verizon, Vodafone) - (A narrow
majority in survey - Slide 14)
Reserved spots for all ONAP Platinum members including Vendors
was a split vote (Slide 15)
Given the above criteria, for this election, the following are 3 options
that could be considered:
Option 1
TSC Cap 17, 18, or 19 (to target 50% operators)
At least one person from each of the 9 Operators must run
Bios, pics, and “
statements of intent” up on the website for at least 1 week.
One big ranked vote conducted via CIVS
Top
ranked operators are identified (9 spots - one per operator company)
Remaining positions taken by top ranking
individuals - one per company
Option 2
Each existing Platinum Member of ONAP circa Jan. 2018 invited to
appoint a TSC rep. (19 Members
)
* Causes issue for LFN Platinum Members that were not originally
part of ONAP as of January 1st
Option 3
Each existing Platinum Member of LFN invited to appoint a TSC rep.
(27 Members) (adds ARM, Lenovo, NEC/Netcracker, Qualcomm, Samsung,
Suse, Red Hat, Juniper)
Fails the ~50% Operator goal
, as well as desired size of TSC
Please consider these options and provide your thoughts, questions, and/or
alternatives to consider.
We need to close on this topic with a vote by the end of June, so time is
of the essence at this point.
----
* From previous experience, capping TSC membership to one person per
company can cause the side-effect of company employees who would otherwise
be very qualified for the position choose *not* to run against another,
often more senior, person within their company. This can produce a
sub-optimal result in TSC make-up.
[0]
https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/25428910/TSC-Composition-Survey-Community.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1528486003000&api=v2
Thanks and best regards,
Phil.
--
Phil Robb
VP Operations - Networking & Orchestration, The Linux Foundation
(O) 970-229-5949
(M) 970-420-4292
Skype: Phil.Robb_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
