+1
Regards
Aayush
From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Xinhui Li
Sent: 18 January 2018 04:48
To: MAHER, RANDA; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Kenny Paul
Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Committer Pro
Dear TSC
The OSN Days from the Linux Foundation will be hosted by Reliance Jio on
January 19th, and I shall be presenting some technical and introductory content
where I will be covering ONAP among other projects.
Please let me know, if you wish some specific topics to be covered from an
"awar
+1
Would like to join the WG
Regards
Aayush
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of xiexj...@chinatelecom.cn
Sent: 22 December 2017 03:25
To: kpaul
Cc: onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Planning for ONAP TSC Elections
Thanks Phil,
+1
I'd lik
Some inputs -
We should categorize the technical success of the platform in tangible ways.
Some suggestions are provided below for further discussion.
We can perhaps institute a process of arriving at a Net Promoter Score (NPS)
for each of these aspects -
1. Operational Agility Metrics
The ab
Not sure why it the mail below did not reflect on the onap-discuss mailing list.
Re-posting here.
Regards
Aayush
On 9 September 2017 at 09:04:14 IST, Aayush Bhatnagar
wrote:
There is one architectural doubt on Policy Enforcement, which is explained
below -
When we enforce a policy, we ma
I tend to agree with Lusheng and Dan.
If the size of the contribution is more than a certain limit, we can provide
guidelines for enabling easier code review. Some suggestions are provided here -
1. Accompany the contribution with UML class diagrams to help structure the
code review.
2. Contri
+1
Regards
Aayush
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of jamil.cha...@orange.com
Sent: 13 July 2017 22:31
To: Gildas Lanilis
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED: A&AI Project needs new repos
for micros
+1
I feel that both physical and virtual meetings can be scheduled together in
July.
Meeting face to face will help. In the recent doodle poll, July 26th has the
highest votes - which is fine with me atleast.
Regards
Aayush
On 14 June 2017 at 18:58:39 IST, Arul Nambi wrote:
+1 why can w
Option-1 sounds more personalized ;)
+1 for Option 1.
Best Wishes
Aayush
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Sauvageau, David
Sent: 17 May 2017 20:10
To: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E); onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Release Naming
Prefer
+1 for the subcommittee formation.
Additional proposal on the deliverables of the architectural subcommittee -
- Create the deployment architecture for ONAP especially for multi-DC VNF
orchestration. This aspect is important as ONAP components such as the DCAE
follow an edge-lake architecture
10 matches
Mail list logo
