Re: [onap-tsc] [modeling] ONAP R2 IM to DM design

Hello Deng Hui, Andy, As the topics 1 - 6 are more or less covered (or in the process of finalizing) by the ETSI GS NFV-SOL001 so it would not be a big deal to re-use the TOSCA constructs from there. However the topic # 7 is not covered (and not planned to be covered) by SOL001 so to my

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

Dear Deng Hui, I would also keep the meeting as it was originally planned later today so the VNF-SDK Modeling team will be involved. BR Andrei From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Vul, Alex Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 9:58 AM To:

Re: [onap-tsc] Architecture Progress

Hi Chris, My concern is that a resource orchestrator is not an agreed entity in ETSI NFV architecture and its functionality is not agreed. To my understanding the ETSI NFV study item that should develop its functionality is currently stopped. BR Andrei From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org

[onap-tsc] ETSI Webinar on VNF package standard

Dear ONAP community, FYI: Tomorrow there will be an ETSI Webinar - NFV Tutorial on VNF packaging specification (ETSI NFV SOL004). This topic is by my opinion relevant for a number of ONAP projects: VNF-SDK, VNF validation, VNF requirements, SDC, Modeling and probably some others. The link for

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

yet. BR Andrei From: Gildas Lanilis [mailto:gildas.lani...@huawei.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 3:11 AM To: Andrei Kojukhov <andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com> Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com&

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Architecture subcommittee kickoff

Hi Lingli, Where can I find the info about the modelling weekly calls? Tks, Andrei From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lingli Deng Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 2:55 AM To: 'Christopher Donley (Chris)' ;

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] Proposal for structuring Modeling projects

Andrei -Original Message- From: Kapeluto, Zahi [mailto:zk0...@intl.att.com] Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2017 3:16 PM To: Dhananjay Pavgi <dp00476...@techmahindra.com>; Andrei Kojukhov <andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>; onap-discuss <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc@lists.on

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposalat OASIS TOSCA WG

Second to Michael, the way it is proposed by Huabing, it is like you have an ocean of BPMN with small optional islands of TOSCA. BR Andrei From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michael Brenner Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 1:46 PM To: Huabing

[onap-tsc] Proposal for structuring Modeling projects

uring. BR, Andrei Andrei Kojukhov, PhD Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image010.png@01D2C9B5.447E30F0] This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/ab