Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

Hi Oliver, I am afraid I agree that we are already behind schedule, and need to finalize the use case for Release 1 as soon as possible. Hence we must be cautious in including any more complexity besides the existing usecase documentation, which is already mature and endorsed by

Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

I think there’s a difference between using proprietary software in the production of the platform (e.g., incorporating proprietary code into ONAP) and testing to make sure that ONAP will work in an ecosystem including commercial products (e.g., bringing commercial VNFs, VIMs, etc. into the

Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

Gil, From vendor side: There is some talk here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Lab+Resource However most of the stuff written so far has been about physical labs. If you are interested more in virtual labs, theres not so much written but there is an understanding we may need a virtual lab

Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

Gil, Thanks for the kind words regarding the ONAP community. Let me make sure I respond to your question and put this subject to rest as it was discussed numerous times by the TSC. 1. Our first integrated release (ONAP seeded by ECOMP and Open-O) will be the first week of Nov. This is our goal

Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

+1. For lab having commercial ecosystem of VNFs; we may consider Tech Mahindra’s VNFXchange lab. thanks & regards, Dhananjay Pavgi Mobile : +91 98220 22264 [cid:image002.png@01CE7323.F2727500] [ONAP_logo_Sig] www.techmahindra.com

Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

For an open source community, the use of proprietary software in the production of the platform (including tools, NFVI platforms, or VNFs used as use cases for developing the platform in open labs), or as part of the released platform, takes the project into a tricky space. It will complicate

Re: [onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

+1 I was taking this as a given. We need a robust vendor/commercial ecosystem of VNFs and NFVI software, in addition to open source. I see that the vCPE and vVoLTE use case documents on the wiki already incorporate this; which I am supportive. From: on behalf

[onap-tsc] Usage of commercial VNF and NFVI+VIM solutions for ONAP R1 use cases, and open lab

Dear TSC members, It is very exciting to see the great momentum and grow in the ONAP community, I hear that there is different opinion / debate with regard to whether release 1 of ONAP should be using commercial VNFs & NFVI+VIM’s solutions for the implementation of the proposed use cases and