Liu,
Interesting. I need to spend time looking at Holmes a bit closer.
From a first glance, the rule designer seems like a GUI for writing policies.
The correlation engine is an algorithm that ingest data and provides signatures
based on those correlations. If my interpretation is right, then I
IMHO, its really an important and critical team for onap community to ride in
right path and to maintain the integrity of onap projects as a whole. so would
like to suggest an idea to systematically handle it as below
- should we consider architecture as a project, which will have ptl,
Dear TSC,
We would like to formally propose ONAP project for MSB(Microservice Bus).
MSB provide key infrastructure functionalities to support Microservice
Architecture including service registration/discovery, service gateway, service
load balancer. It's a pluggable architecture so it
Mazin and Junjie,
As I was preparing the DCAE project proposal, I had the same impression as
Mazin that Holmes correlation engine appeared to align well with DCAE's micro
service analytics architecture. Hence I put in a placeholder for possible
harmonization with Holmes.
However this
Hello ONAP Community Members:
Please consider this email as the kickoff of the ONAP Standards/SDO
Coordinator Election process. A description of the role can be found on
the ONAP Technical Community Coordinator's page here:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Technical+Community+Coordinators
Hi
Yes, I agree with your suggestion, Holmes will be a Microservice
application running in DCAE just like all analytics Microservices. Holmes is
not a independence application without DCAE structure.
刘军杰 liujunjie
GA产品经理 GA Product Manager
服务及MANO产品部/系统产品 Service & MANO
Nermin/Mazin,
This is a very good initiative. Can I suggest that there is a plan to include
module(s) that describe how ONAP relates to the standards bodies that are also
playing an important role in the NFV ecosystem.
I see mention of "ecosystem" and "upstream projects". I don't see explicit
hi eric
Sorry, I don't preemail to the project contact person. I see in the wiki
now the contact person is DeWayne Filppi (dewa...@gigaspaces.com), right?
We are an open community combined from openo and openecomp and other
companies.
The SO seed code link from the both
Hi Michael,
I brought this issue here only because the proposal has a strong relationship
to the ONAP community.
In the OASIS TOSCA meeting and maillist, I have repeatedly clarified that our
proposal only adds an option for the backward-compatible with TOSCA 1.0 to
allow reusing the
Dear TSC,
We would like to formally propose ONAP project for Modeling.
The proposal wiki page, which includes details of the project description,
project scopes, and proposed repo names, can be found at:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling
The Modeling team consists of representatives
Dear ONAP TSC,
I would like to formally propose Integration project for your approval.
Project details: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration
Participants: Amdocs, AT, China Mobile, China Telecom, Huawei, Mirantis,
Orange, TechMahindra, ZTE
Regards,
Helen Chen
Principal Architect,
In the proposal we are putting together, OOM and DCAE, and other components as
well, would use the "Common Controller Framework", which is a separate project,
to unify the common aspects of deployment and management of both the ONAP
platform components and the services that run on the ONAP
Dear TSC,
I would like to formally propose “Multi VIM/Cloud” project for your approval.
Project: Multi VIM/Cloud --
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247262
Project Description: ONAP needs underlying virtualized infrastructure to
deploy, run, and manage network services
Dear TSC,
We would like to formally propose ONAP project for DCAE.
The proposal wiki page, which includes details of the project description
(including sub projects), project scopes, and proposed repo names, can be found
at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/DCAE.
The DCAE team consists of
Hello Committee Members,
I would like to submit a project proposal for a project focusing on Change
Management for NF's in ONAP.
Details for this proposal can be found in:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Network+Function+Change+Management+Project+Proposal
Thanks,
Emmanouil
Hello all
Please help to do doodle for our regular weekly teleconf time, we are going to
close the doodle until this Sunday, EDT 10AM
http://doodle.com/poll/itpu466itrriqerc
Thanks a lot
DENG Hui
___
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
"The proposal has been discussed in the OASIS TOSCA for a couple of weeks
and most of the members agreed on it except the strong pushback from
Michael of Gigaspaces."
Huabing et al
I wanted to ask that we will keep the discussion on a professional and not
a personal level.
First i want to
Hello,
Active and Available Inventory Project proposal is ready for review by the ONAP
TSC.
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3246952
Please advise if you need any further detail.
regards,
Colin
Colin Burns
Product Manager
Amdocs Open Network
mobile: +44(0) 7717 505854
Hello Committee Members,
I would like to submit a project proposal for SNIRO (Optimization Framework):
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/SNIRO+Optimization+Framework
The SNIRO project (Service, Network, Infrastructure, and Resource Optimization)
focuses on providing a platform for addressing
Thank you Sastry for your submission.
Phil.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:45 AM, ISUKAPALLI, SASTRY S (SASTRY) <
sas...@research.att.com> wrote:
> Hello Committee Members,
>
>
>
> I would like to submit a project proposal for SNIRO (Optimization
> Framework):
>
>
>
Hello David:
Yes, all project proposals need to be on the "Proposing a Project" page.
Please move your second proposal to that page if it is wholly separate and
distinct of the first proposal. If it is a "subproject" or "subcomponent"
of the first project, then please just add the documentation
Hi,
Some more updates:
• IETF YANG/NETMOD/SUPA (IRTF NFVRG)
• TMF OSS/API/ZOOM
• MEF LSO
• ETSI NFV
• ETSI MEC
• OASIS TOSCA
• 3GPP SA5 and SA2 (5G architecture, service chaining, network slicing
etc.)
• BBF SDN/NFV Work
Hello Committee Members,
I would like to submit the following project proposal:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal
Regards,
Pam
Pamela Dragosh
Lead Inventive Scientist
ONAP Policy
AT Research
pdrag...@research.att.com
Hello tsc members,
I'am bringing to your attention a new project proposal: "CLAMP", for you to
approve.
The description page of the project is located at
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CLAMP
Best Regards,
Gervais-Martial Ngueko
Principal, Application Design
CP - Common Platform & Technology
Hi All,
I've become aware of colloborative work between a number of communities
regarding CI/CD, where there is information here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Collaboration
I assume it would be good to consider this as well from an ONAP perspective.
Any ideas on how we should?
Yes that would be in scope of the integration project.
Oliver
On May 11, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Stephen Terrill
> wrote:
Hi All,
I’ve become aware of colloborative work between a number of communities
regarding CI/CD, where there
Hi,
As an OPNFV Board member, I can confirm that this was indeed a
high priority of the cross project harmonization discussion from the Leadership
Summit in Lake Tahoe and progress ongoing. I would recommend ONAP TSC to
coordinate thru the appropriate means in a common CI/CD. I
I think we can just drop in ONAP to that list were Open-O is.
There is an integration project here in ONAP being proposed so that would apply
still unless the TSC wants a separate coordinator here instead.
Thanks,
Daniel Rose
ECOMP / ONAP
com.att.ecomp
732-420-7308
From:
Huabing,
I like your direction of giving concrete examples for possible implementation
that you did in some other branch of this thread. Following that, could you
please illustrate how the following scenario will be addressed with a BPMN
workflow:
Let say I am deploying an EPC P-GW, and in
Chris, TSC,
Can Silver members put forth a representative to contribute to
the architecture subcommittee, or will this be only available to TSC members or
representatives from member companies of a certain level?
This would seem to be to be a very important step for
Bob,
I propose that it's open to anyone, regardless of membership level (if any).
Thanks,
Chris
From: Bob Monkman [mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:32 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee
Chris,
+1
Robert (Bob) Monkman
Networking Software Strategy & Ecosystem Programs
ARM
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490
Skype: robert.monkman
From: Christopher Donley (Chris) [mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:03 PM
To: Bob Monkman
Hello
I can't understand how projects editing are managed, modifications are
introduced in SO project without agreement and not aligned with the what were
discussed and agreed last week.
Phil, Mazin cloud you clarify the situation ?
Regards
Jamil
Le 11 mai 2017 à 21:48,
+1
De : Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 11 mai 2017 22:17
À : ROSE, DANIEL V
Cc : SPATSCHECK, OLIVER; DEBEAU Eric IMT/OLN; dewa...@gigaspaces.com;
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator
In many other communities, as a matter of
There has been a ton of change on the page in the last day:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=4719246=29=6
I hope everyone who needed to be involved has been involved because I didn't
see much public discussion about this project on this mailing lists.
Daniel Rose
In many other communities, as a matter of social norm, not governance, if
one is going to edit a project proposal, it is considered good manners to
ask the originator of a proposal before editing it in a substantive way.
Perhaps we should consider communicating this social norm withing the ONAP
Hello,
ONAP University Project proposal is ready for review by ONAP TSC.
ONAP University
Contact: Mazin Gilbert (AT) and Nermin Mohamed (Huawei)
Description:
Provide overview of the ONAP University training courses for users, developers
and any other interested parties of member and non-member
Hello
I am surprised to discover that open-o/gso is considered as the seed code for
the Service Orchestrator.
As far as I know, we never decided such choice during the discussions last week
and it should be a TSC decision.
Regards
Eric
So am I. I thought in the charter we had agreed that the MSO code base would
be used for this. Similar to the 3 legacy Open-O components.
Was there any discussion on this anywhere?
Thx
Oliver
> On May 11, 2017, at 3:48 PM EDT, eric.deb...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am surprised
Gildas and I have been participating in the group, representing OPEN-O, and
Phil has been active, as well. This group is working more along the lines of
harmonizing tools, labs, and processes, rather than Integration.
I would recommend whomever is maintaining the CI/CD tooling and
40 matches
Mail list logo