Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal for Holmes project

2017-05-11 Thread GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)
Liu, Interesting. I need to spend time looking at Holmes a bit closer. From a first glance, the rule designer seems like a GUI for writing policies. The correlation engine is an algorithm that ingest data and provides signatures based on those correlations. If my interpretation is right, then I

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee

2017-05-11 Thread Kanagaraj Manickam
IMHO, its really an important and critical team for onap community to ride in right path and to maintain the integrity of onap projects as a whole. so would like to suggest an idea to systematically handle it as below - should we consider architecture as a project, which will have ptl,

[onap-tsc] Project Proposal: MSB

2017-05-11 Thread zhao.huabing
Dear TSC, We would like to formally propose ONAP project for MSB(Microservice Bus). MSB provide key infrastructure functionalities to support Microservice Architecture including service registration/discovery, service gateway, service load balancer. It's a pluggable architecture so it

Re: [onap-tsc] 答复: Re: Proposal for Holmes project

2017-05-11 Thread JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)
Mazin and Junjie, As I was preparing the DCAE project proposal, I had the same impression as Mazin that Holmes correlation engine appeared to align well with DCAE's micro service analytics architecture. Hence I put in a placeholder for possible harmonization with Holmes. However this

[onap-tsc] [ONAP STANDARDS/SDO COORDINATOR ELECTION] Kickoff of the ONAP Standards/SDO Coordinator Election

2017-05-11 Thread Phil Robb
Hello ONAP Community Members: Please consider this email as the kickoff of the ONAP Standards/SDO Coordinator Election process. A description of the role can be found on the ONAP Technical Community Coordinator's page here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Technical+Community+Coordinators

[onap-tsc] 答复: Re: Proposal for Holmes project

2017-05-11 Thread liu.junjie2
Hi Yes, I agree with your suggestion, Holmes will be a Microservice application running in DCAE just like all analytics Microservices. Holmes is not a independence application without DCAE structure. 刘军杰 liujunjie GA产品经理 GA Product Manager 服务及MANO产品部/系统产品 Service & MANO

Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP University Project Proposal

2017-05-11 Thread Don Clarke
Nermin/Mazin, This is a very good initiative. Can I suggest that there is a plan to include module(s) that describe how ONAP relates to the standards bodies that are also playing an important role in the NFV ecosystem. I see mention of "ecosystem" and "upstream projects". I don't see explicit

[onap-tsc] 答复: Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread zhang.maopeng1
hi eric Sorry, I don't preemail to the project contact person. I see in the wiki now the contact person is DeWayne Filppi (dewa...@gigaspaces.com), right? We are an open community combined from openo and openecomp and other companies. The SO seed code link from the both

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at OASISTOSCA WG

2017-05-11 Thread zhao.huabing
Hi Michael, I brought this issue here only because the proposal has a strong relationship to the ONAP community. In the OASIS TOSCA meeting and maillist, I have repeatedly clarified that our proposal only adds an option for the backward-compatible with TOSCA 1.0 to allow reusing the

[onap-tsc] Project Proposal: Modeling

2017-05-11 Thread denghui (L)
Dear TSC, We would like to formally propose ONAP project for Modeling. The proposal wiki page, which includes details of the project description, project scopes, and proposed repo names, can be found at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling The Modeling team consists of representatives

[onap-tsc] Integration Project Proposal

2017-05-11 Thread Yunxia Chen
Dear ONAP TSC, I would like to formally propose Integration project for your approval. Project details: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration Participants: Amdocs, AT, China Mobile, China Telecom, Huawei, Mirantis, Orange, TechMahindra, ZTE Regards, Helen Chen Principal Architect,

Re: [onap-tsc] Project Proposal: ONAP Operations Manager / ONAP on Containers

2017-05-11 Thread RATH, CHRISTOPHER A (CHRISTOPHER A)
In the proposal we are putting together, OOM and DCAE, and other components as well, would use the "Common Controller Framework", which is a separate project, to unify the common aspects of deployment and management of both the ONAP platform components and the services that run on the ONAP

[onap-tsc] Project Proposal: Multi VIM/Cloud

2017-05-11 Thread Danny Lin
Dear TSC, I would like to formally propose “Multi VIM/Cloud” project for your approval. Project: Multi VIM/Cloud -- https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247262 Project Description: ONAP needs underlying virtualized infrastructure to deploy, run, and manage network services

[onap-tsc] Project Proposal: DCAE

2017-05-11 Thread JI, LUSHENG (LUSHENG)
Dear TSC, We would like to formally propose ONAP project for DCAE. The proposal wiki page, which includes details of the project description (including sub projects), project scopes, and proposed repo names, can be found at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/DCAE. The DCAE team consists of

[onap-tsc] Project Proposal for Network Function Change Management.

2017-05-11 Thread MAVROGIORGIS, EMMANUIL (EMMANUIL)
Hello Committee Members, I would like to submit a project proposal for a project focusing on Change Management for NF's in ONAP. Details for this proposal can be found in: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Network+Function+Change+Management+Project+Proposal Thanks, Emmanouil

[onap-tsc] [Modeling]Start Poll Modeling weekly teleconf time

2017-05-11 Thread denghui (L)
Hello all Please help to do doodle for our regular weekly teleconf time, we are going to close the doodle until this Sunday, EDT 10AM http://doodle.com/poll/itpu466itrriqerc Thanks a lot DENG Hui ___ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at OASIS TOSCA WG

2017-05-11 Thread Nati Shalom
"The proposal has been discussed in the OASIS TOSCA for a couple of weeks and most of the members agreed on it except the strong pushback from Michael of Gigaspaces." Huabing et al I wanted to ask that we will keep the discussion on a professional and not a personal level. First i want to

[onap-tsc] Active and Available Inventory Project proposal

2017-05-11 Thread Colin Burns
Hello, Active and Available Inventory Project proposal is ready for review by the ONAP TSC. https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3246952 Please advise if you need any further detail. regards, Colin Colin Burns Product Manager Amdocs Open Network mobile: +44(0) 7717 505854

[onap-tsc] Project Proposal for SNIRO (Optimization Framework)

2017-05-11 Thread ISUKAPALLI, SASTRY S (SASTRY)
Hello Committee Members, I would like to submit a project proposal for SNIRO (Optimization Framework): https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/SNIRO+Optimization+Framework The SNIRO project (Service, Network, Infrastructure, and Resource Optimization) focuses on providing a platform for addressing

Re: [onap-tsc] Project Proposal for SNIRO (Optimization Framework)

2017-05-11 Thread Phil Robb
Thank you Sastry for your submission. Phil. On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:45 AM, ISUKAPALLI, SASTRY S (SASTRY) < sas...@research.att.com> wrote: > Hello Committee Members, > > > > I would like to submit a project proposal for SNIRO (Optimization > Framework): > > >

Re: [onap-tsc] Project Proposal: ONAP Operations Manager / ONAP on Containers

2017-05-11 Thread Phil Robb
Hello David: Yes, all project proposals need to be on the "Proposing a Project" page. Please move your second proposal to that page if it is wholly separate and distinct of the first proposal. If it is a "subproject" or "subcomponent" of the first project, then please just add the documentation

Re: [onap-tsc] Creation Request for Coordination Area Standard/SDO

2017-05-11 Thread Alla Goldner
Hi, Some more updates: • IETF YANG/NETMOD/SUPA (IRTF NFVRG) • TMF OSS/API/ZOOM • MEF LSO • ETSI NFV • ETSI MEC • OASIS TOSCA • 3GPP SA5 and SA2 (5G architecture, service chaining, network slicing etc.) • BBF SDN/NFV Work

[onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal

2017-05-11 Thread DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM)
Hello Committee Members, I would like to submit the following project proposal: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal Regards, Pam Pamela Dragosh Lead Inventive Scientist ONAP Policy AT Research pdrag...@research.att.com

[onap-tsc] CLAMP project proposal

2017-05-11 Thread Ngueko, Gervais-Martial
Hello tsc members, I'am bringing to your attention a new project proposal: "CLAMP", for you to approve. The description page of the project is located at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CLAMP Best Regards, Gervais-Martial Ngueko Principal, Application Design CP - Common Platform & Technology

[onap-tsc] CI/CD

2017-05-11 Thread Stephen Terrill
Hi All, I've become aware of colloborative work between a number of communities regarding CI/CD, where there is information here: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Collaboration I assume it would be good to consider this as well from an ONAP perspective. Any ideas on how we should?

Re: [onap-tsc] CI/CD

2017-05-11 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Yes that would be in scope of the integration project. Oliver On May 11, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Stephen Terrill > wrote: Hi All, I’ve become aware of colloborative work between a number of communities regarding CI/CD, where there

Re: [onap-tsc] CI/CD

2017-05-11 Thread Bob Monkman
Hi, As an OPNFV Board member, I can confirm that this was indeed a high priority of the cross project harmonization discussion from the Leadership Summit in Lake Tahoe and progress ongoing. I would recommend ONAP TSC to coordinate thru the appropriate means in a common CI/CD. I

Re: [onap-tsc] CI/CD

2017-05-11 Thread ROSE, DANIEL V
I think we can just drop in ONAP to that list were Open-O is. There is an integration project here in ONAP being proposed so that would apply still unless the TSC wants a separate coordinator here instead. Thanks, Daniel Rose ECOMP / ONAP com.att.ecomp 732-420-7308 From:

Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at OASIS TOSCA WG

2017-05-11 Thread Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose USA)
Huabing, I like your direction of giving concrete examples for possible implementation that you did in some other branch of this thread. Following that, could you please illustrate how the following scenario will be addressed with a BPMN workflow: Let say I am deploying an EPC P-GW, and in

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee

2017-05-11 Thread Bob Monkman
Chris, TSC, Can Silver members put forth a representative to contribute to the architecture subcommittee, or will this be only available to TSC members or representatives from member companies of a certain level? This would seem to be to be a very important step for

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee

2017-05-11 Thread Christopher Donley (Chris)
Bob, I propose that it's open to anyone, regardless of membership level (if any). Thanks, Chris From: Bob Monkman [mailto:bob.monk...@arm.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:32 AM To: Christopher Donley (Chris); onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee Chris,

Re: [onap-tsc] Proposal: Architecture Subcommittee

2017-05-11 Thread Bob Monkman
+1  Robert (Bob) Monkman Networking Software Strategy & Ecosystem Programs ARM 150 Rose Orchard Way San Jose, Ca 95134 M: +1.510.676.5490 Skype: robert.monkman From: Christopher Donley (Chris) [mailto:christopher.don...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:03 PM To: Bob Monkman

Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello I can't understand how projects editing are managed, modifications are introduced in SO project without agreement and not aligned with the what were discussed and agreed last week. Phil, Mazin cloud you clarify the situation ? Regards Jamil Le 11 mai 2017 à 21:48,

Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread eric.debeau
+1 De : Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 11 mai 2017 22:17 À : ROSE, DANIEL V Cc : SPATSCHECK, OLIVER; DEBEAU Eric IMT/OLN; dewa...@gigaspaces.com; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator In many other communities, as a matter of

Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread ROSE, DANIEL V
There has been a ton of change on the page in the last day: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=4719246=29=6 I hope everyone who needed to be involved has been involved because I didn't see much public discussion about this project on this mailing lists. Daniel Rose

Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread Ed Warnicke
In many other communities, as a matter of social norm, not governance, if one is going to edit a project proposal, it is considered good manners to ask the originator of a proposal before editing it in a substantive way. Perhaps we should consider communicating this social norm withing the ONAP

[onap-tsc] ONAP University Project Proposal

2017-05-11 Thread Nermin Mohamed
Hello, ONAP University Project proposal is ready for review by ONAP TSC. ONAP University Contact: Mazin Gilbert (AT) and Nermin Mohamed (Huawei) Description: Provide overview of the ONAP University training courses for users, developers and any other interested parties of member and non-member

[onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread eric.debeau
Hello I am surprised to discover that open-o/gso is considered as the seed code for the Service Orchestrator. As far as I know, we never decided such choice during the discussions last week and it should be a TSC decision. Regards Eric

Re: [onap-tsc] Seed code for Service Orchestrator

2017-05-11 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
So am I. I thought in the charter we had agreed that the MSO code base would be used for this. Similar to the 3 legacy Open-O components. Was there any discussion on this anywhere? Thx Oliver > On May 11, 2017, at 3:48 PM EDT, eric.deb...@orange.com wrote: > > Hello > > I am surprised

Re: [onap-tsc] CI/CD

2017-05-11 Thread Christopher Donley (Chris)
Gildas and I have been participating in the group, representing OPEN-O, and Phil has been active, as well. This group is working more along the lines of harmonizing tools, labs, and processes, rather than Integration. I would recommend whomever is maintaining the CI/CD tooling and