+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: 29 June 2017 21:13
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] Corrective Action on Approved Project Proposals
TSC Members:
The following are discrepancies and/or
+1
Lingli
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill
Sent: 2017年6月30日 15:50
To: Kenny Paul ; onap-tsc
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Corrective Action on Approved Project
+1
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Executive Software Architect
+1-314-749-7422
Twitter: @DJHunt
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 30, 2017, at 2:49 AM, Stephen Terrill
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
> [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On
Mazin,
your email triggered me to actually go through the wiki and get some stats. I
attached a spreadsheet with committers per company and project (I did this
manually so there might be some minor mistakes but the trend holds). Also the
companies are sorted by appearance so the order is
Hi PTLs,
Since each project have a PTL and acording to last TSC meeting, we still need
feed back from SO/APP-C/ONAP SDN-C team. See detail for the table below.
I will set up a meeting next wednesday(9 PM China, 1 PM UTC, 9 AM US/Eastern,
5th July ) to discuss about the approach of your
Something else that helps a great deal is for the original author of the
proposal to be the gatekeeper on changes to the proposal, including adding
committers. Wiki's are wonderful in that anyone can fix anything, but for
project proposals, editing them to shift without consent their intent or
+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of SPATSCHECK, OLIVER
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 11:57 AM
To: Andrew Grimberg
Cc: t...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Committers and voting - Please read.
+1
On Jun 30, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Andrew Grimberg
> wrote:
To help weed things down I would suggest that every repository in a
project be required to define a distinct list of committers and not
allow an umbrella project to
+1
发自我的zMail
原始邮件
发件人:
KennyPaul
收件人:onap-tsc
日期:
2017-06-30 03:12:59
主题:[onap-tsc] Corrective Action on Approved Project Proposals
TSC Members:
The following are discrepancies and/or change requests in the approved
On 06/30/2017 07:00 AM, SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) wrote:
> I think the TSC needs to either step up and enforce it’s own rules or
> abandon the rule altogether. The current status quo punish people which
> play by the rules which I would think is not the intend of the TSC.
>
> I would be
+1
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org]
On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:13 PM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] Corrective Action on Approved Project Proposals
TSC Members:
The following are
Hello ONAP TSC Members:
It has come to my attention that there are some questions and concerns from
community members regarding the initial committer lists and subsequent PTL
elections for our newly formed sub-projects within ONAP.
When such issues arise within a sub-project, particularly when
12 matches
Mail list logo