[onap-tsc] December Event CFP Notifications Delayed.

2017-11-14 Thread Kenny Paul
This is just to let everyone know that we are running behind on the notifications. Also a few people have reported that their submission did not go through so please look over the list below to ensure your submission is there. NOTE: THIS IS JUST THE LIST SUBMISSIONS - THIS IS NOT THE

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Christopher Donley (Chris)
The architecture subcommittee is working on the high-level architecture. See http://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guides/onap-developer/architecture/onap-architecture.html Projects themselves are publishing the more detailed architecture, APIs, etc. on readthedocs. Chris From:

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Kanagaraj Manickam
Dear Kenny, I would like share my point of view : As Manoop mentioned below, It would be better, if we could bring Portal, ONAP CLI span across Design Time and Run-Time services similar to OOM reported now. May be something as follows: [cid:image002.png@01D35DFB.B2EE1C00]

[onap-tsc] Clarifying the TSC selected branching model for Amsterdam

2017-11-14 Thread Michael Still
Hi, so I've been watching the video of the 9 November TSC meeting, and find the discussion of the branching model for Amsterdam quite interesting. Is this documented anywhere on the wiki? I ask because I have a couple of questions: - my understanding of the stated plan is that Amsterdam will be

[onap-tsc] 答复: Re: [onap-discuss] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread zhang.maopeng1
Hi Susana, VFC project in R1 includes NFVO and VNFM components, mainly focused on the NS LCM and VNFLCM. NSLCM NBI and GVNFM NBI please refer to https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VF-C+R1+Deliverables NSLCM API Specification v0.1. and GVNFM API

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide - VMs and CaaS Deployments

2017-11-14 Thread Michael O'Brien
Some additional info on a question of deployment scenarios – 4 questions in. We don’t currently support Rackspace HEAT anymore since the DCAE refactor – unless we are planning a retrofit of the vanilla changes back to the Rackspace yaml and a way to use Designate in Rackspace’s managed

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Pasi Vaananen
Are Azure & AMZ clouds really supported in Amsterdam as NFVI+VIM (or at all) ? If not, then they should not be in this "official" picture. Pasi On 11/13/2017 07:03 PM, Kenny Paul wrote: > As was pointed out in Paris there are too many variations of the > Amsterdam architecture which is bad to

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
I agree, we don’t need to mention commercial cloud solution in our architecture Regards Jamil Le 14 nov. 2017 à 14:06, Pasi Vaananen > a écrit : Are Azure & AMZ clouds really supported in Amsterdam as NFVI+VIM (or at all) ? If not, then they

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Kenny Paul
+Lisa > On Nov 14, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Pasi Vaananen wrote: > > Are Azure & AMZ clouds really supported in Amsterdam as NFVI+VIM (or at all) > ? If not, then they should not be in this "official" picture. > Pasi > > On 11/13/2017 07:03 PM, Kenny Paul wrote: >> As was

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Vladimir The diagram is more a technical overview of onap components. Regards Jamil Le 14 nov. 2017 à 11:25, Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) > a écrit : Hello, Kenny Thanks for sharing the Architecture diagram. I will appreciate if you help me with a

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Kenny I have a question on the ETSI aligned of VFC module, to my knowledge the VFC interfaces are not aligned with ETSI NFV. I think we need to remove this term from VFC and to add that ONAP architecture is Functionally aligned with ETSI NFV. Regards Jamil De :

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)
Hello, Kenny Thanks for sharing the Architecture diagram. I will appreciate if you help me with a question that I have on the ONAP architecture documentation. Consider potential products to be integrated into the ONAP system itself, interfacing to its components such as the Policy Framework and

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Ramki Krishnan
For Amsterdam, Multi-VIM/Cloud supports both OpenStack based and VMware Clouds. A concrete example is the VoLTE use case: https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6593603 -- Thanks, Ramki From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)
How is it related to my question on the timeline for delivery of specification with certain level of details? Thanks Vladimir From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:16 PM To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) Cc: Kenny

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Lisa Caywood
Jamil, we can not spell out the names of all of the components on the slide; there isn't room. It must be legible, including from a distance (eg in a public presentation). Chris can answer #2. Thanks, Lisa On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:14 AM, wrote: > Hello Kenny > >

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Lisa I understand but also we cannot keep a no meaning abbreviations... We can have a list of abbreviation or a simplify name like: · Clamp > Closed Loop · AAF > Authorization · OOF Optimization Regards Jamil De : Lisa Caywood [mailto:lcayw...@linuxfoundation.org]

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)
Thanks, Jamil. I like the diagram. My question was Is there an intention / timeline for delivery of specifications with the level of details as e.g. in OpenStack (ETSI NFV, …)? Vladimir From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 3:45 PM To:

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Addepalli, Srinivasa R
+ 1 Amsterdam repositories support various openstack variations - VMWare Openstack, Windriver Openstack, Newton Openstack etc... Though Azure and EC2 APIs can be abstracted by Openstack API, I think that there would be some conversion/translation required, but I don't see any code in there.

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hello Kenny Additional comments and proposals on this figure: 1- Remove ETSI NFV alignment from VFC and to replace it by a general note that 'ONAP is functionally aligned with ETSI NFV architecture' 2- We need to remove AWS, Rackspace and Azure. Why Rackspace is listed and not

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Yes this is in the Scope of the Architecture subcommittee https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Goals De : Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:vyano...@cisco.com] Envoyé : mardi 14 novembre 2017 14:55 À : CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN Cc : Kenny Paul; onap-discuss; onap-tsc; Lisa Caywood Objet : RE: [onap-tsc]

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Vladimir Yanover (vyanover)
And where this intention / timeline is captured? Thanks Vladimir From: jamil.cha...@orange.com [mailto:jamil.cha...@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:29 PM To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide It should be part

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Vul, Alex
Jamil, As far as I know, being able to utilize public cloud (Azure/AWS/etc) compute resources is an ONAP requirement. The question is to what extent our architecture diagrams should represent the reality of individual releases vs being more release agnostic and future looking? Regards, Alex

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Pasi Vaananen
"The officially approved image for the *Amsterdam *Architecture". We need both r1 and "beyond" slides ... but this slide was explicitly said to be a representation of *Amsterdam* architecture. As such, IMHO it should be correct on what it can & cannot support, which is why I raised the point.

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread Vul, Alex
Pasi - agree with you... we need a general-purpose architecture diagram as well as release specific diagrams with (perhaps) greyed out areas for what we don't support in a particular release... From: Pasi Vaananen [mailto:pvaan...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:43 AM To: Vul,

Re: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP Architecture Slide

2017-11-14 Thread jamil.chawki
Hi Susana Ok in this case we have to remove this from VFC. Regards jamil De : Sabater, Susana, Vodafone Spain [mailto:susana.saba...@vodafone.com] Envoyé : mardi 14 novembre 2017 16:26 À : Lisa Caywood; CHAWKI Jamil IMT/OLN Cc : onap-discuss; onap-tsc Objet : RE: [onap-tsc] Official ONAP