On 21.11.2011 19:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Andre Fischer wrote:
good point but please keep in mind that this is a temporary workaround.
Much work is currently being done ... the --enable-copyleft switch
will not live for very long.
Thanks for the information, but since configure is writing a
2011/11/21 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
So in total, maybe something like:
=
Copyright © 2011 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
I'm not sure about this. Is there any code
+1, makes sense to me :)
On 22.11.2011 00:46, Rob Weir wrote:
We have with this project something that most other Apache projects
don't have and which the legacy OOo project never had. We have two
independent websites.
We have the legacy www.openoffice.org website, which served as an
end-user
+1 to Rob's and Simon's suggestion.
I really have no interest in keeping my @openoffice.org email forward,
as it's only good for receiving lots of Spam.
Malte.
On 21.11.2011 18:41, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 21 Nov 2011, at 17:27, Rob Weir wrote:
1) Check with Andrew on the latest date where
Hi,
Still diff'ing 3.2.x and 3.3.+ source, code, I'm analysing the new
view overlay manager. Can someone tell me who implemented it (sd) ?
Probably Andre or Armin ?
Thanks in advance,
Eric Bachard
--
qɔᴉɹə
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association
On 11/21/11 10:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Alexandro started fixing the Spanish site, but there is more to do ...
it would be interesting to know where the problem is and what the
planned changes are. There are valid concerns about the page and i would
really appreciate if Alexandro would
Hi Eric,
not from me. Probably from Christian.
Regards,
Andre
On 22.11.2011 10:58, eric b wrote:
Hi,
Still diff'ing 3.2.x and 3.3.+ source, code, I'm analysing the new view
overlay manager. Can someone tell me who implemented it (sd) ?
Probably Andre or Armin ?
Thanks in advance,
Eric
it sounds like a Déjà vu and i think we had already a discussion that
goes in this direction.
Yes, i totally agree on this separation and it makes sense to me. Moving
forward with this separation we need much less migration and can
concentrate on the most important pages of the main portal
+1 from me
On 11/22/11 10:04 AM, Malte Timmermann wrote:
+1 to Rob's and Simon's suggestion.
I really have no interest in keeping my @openoffice.org email forward,
as it's only good for receiving lots of Spam.
Malte.
On 21.11.2011 18:41, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 21 Nov 2011, at 17:27, Rob
Hi,
i would like to gave a short update.
I stumbled over problems using a downloaded epm 4.2
(http://www.epmhome.org), build and install it on a Fedora 16 system
(rpm based).
The epm call failed to build the rpm packages. It seems that epm
triggers /bin/rpm with some parameters that are
Le 22 nov. 11 à 11:57, Jürgen Schmidt a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
i would like to gave a short update.
I stumbled over problems using a downloaded epm 4.2 (http://
www.epmhome.org), build and install it on a Fedora 16 system (rpm
based).
The epm call failed to build the rpm packages. It
Hi Shane, Jim and all,
Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
If we (Apache) use OpenOffice as product name and Apache OpenOffice as
project name, then we can give Team OOo the OpenOffice.org brand
Hi all,
I have removed another library, sigh. swingExtSrc has a somewhat
unclear license, probably LGPL. It is an experimental library that
apparently never got the attention from Sun, now Orcale, to get a clear
license.
It is used by the rhino library, which provides JavaScript support
2011/11/22 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
On 11/21/11 10:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Alexandro started fixing the Spanish site, but there is more to do ...
it would be interesting to know where the problem is and what the planned
changes are. There are valid concerns about the page
Hi eric,
On 22.11.2011 10:58, eric b wrote:
Hi,
Still diff'ing 3.2.x and 3.3.+ source, code, I'm analysing the new view
overlay manager. Can someone tell me who implemented it (sd) ?
Probably Andre or Armin ?
Yes, from me, but it's not so new. It allows to have an 'overlay' on the
Hi *,
no further responses, thus - if no complaints - I'll start adding a
branch for svg replacement soon...
Sincerely,
Armin
On 21.11.2011 14:48, Armin Le Grand wrote:
Hi eric,
On 21.11.2011 14:26, eric b wrote:
Hi Armin,
Le 21 nov. 11 à 13:14, Armin a écrit :
[..]
+1
Marcus
Am 11/22/2011 11:24 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
it sounds like a Déjà vu and i think we had already a discussion that
goes in this direction.
Yes, i totally agree on this separation and it makes sense to me. Moving
forward with this separation we need much less migration and can
Hi Ross and all,
Shall we use native language instead of national language please?
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
That is not to say there can't be national language support groups
with their own materials. But, at least in this transition stage
On 22 November 2011 11:36, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ross and all,
Shall we use native language instead of national language please?
Yes - thanks for reminding me.
Ross
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
That is not to say
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shane, Jim and all,
Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 17, 2011, at 7:24 AM, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
If we (Apache) use OpenOffice as product name and Apache
Hmmm ...
Nevermind, OpenPKG is rather bulky.
Unfortunately portable packagers seem not
to be too common anymore.
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
From: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [CODE]: 118605 remove epm?
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Hi Pedro,
On 11/22/11 1:52 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hmmm ...
Nevermind, OpenPKG is rather bulky.
Unfortunately portable packagers seem not
to be too common anymore.
the point is simply that we have to understand the whole packaging
process better. I thought it was worse to check if it's
Le 22 nov. 11 à 14:33, Jürgen Schmidt a écrit :
Hi Pedro,
On 11/22/11 1:52 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hmmm ...
Nevermind, OpenPKG is rather bulky.
Unfortunately portable packagers seem not
to be too common anymore.
the point is simply that we have to understand the whole packaging
On 11/20/2011 04:33 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
Hi,
is there any admin of oooforum.org around here?
It's getting spamed with really disgusting content on the front page.
Peter
The OOoForum is fully managed to Ed Buck. He has two low level
administrators of which I am one.
Ed appears to have
2011/11/22 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org
I posted this to their forum, see if it may motivate some people there
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/**viewtopic.phtml?p=456167#**456167http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=456167#456167
I don't think that some emails on the
+1 as well, your thread really is not a good description of the thought
process here, nor is the reference to the Apache group (which means
something different) a good idea.
It would be really, really helpful to find a way for PPMC members on
this list to work directly with the server admins
Well ...
We need something that works now and basically something
that will produce RPMs. Having something to do this is handy
but should not a requirement for building. I think with just
having it disabled by default we comply with the ASF policies.
All other packages that I know of just have
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 09:31 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I posted this to their forum, see if it may motivate some people there
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=456167#456167
Hi Andrew,
I added some comments to the forum post above.
For those that don't follow the
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
...
Changing or removing a PayPal button can't be a big issue.
+1, I can do it but will that mean I have to maintain it?
I can't read Spanish and therefore i depend on a good
explanation. But i
would really appreciate if we as PPMC can
I noticed this coming to the commits mailing list. That is OK, if we
want it that way. But please note that we also have an
ooo-notifications.i.a.o mailing list. This was requested and created,
per the original podling proposal, to use for CI notifications. So if
we want to send these notes to
Hi all,
Another category-x licensed library is gone. A pre-installed cppunit
can be used instead. The gnu make build system needed some convincing to
accept this change, though.
Would anybody like to review and commit?
More information about issue 118608 can be found here:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
+1 Greatly needed.
However, it's the PPMC who has to do the request.
Oh and David has to sign the iCLA if he hasn't already.
Dave is already a committer, Apache ID= thegurkha.
If he gets no response from sending an
++1
AH!! Jürgen said the magic word: PORTAL. Now I can say something that has been
nagging at me without words.
It will be extremely valuable for the openoffice.org web site to remain the
portal of the openoffice.org lineage, where the entry to Apache OpenOffice is
more tightly-coupled but
+1
All rights reserved is some legalese hangover, and is a factually incorrect
claim that makes folks nutty. It is better not to use it at all.
I believe the standard Apache notice suggested by Gianluca is appropriate.
There could be buttons (or links) for accessing the installed copies
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 11/20/2011 04:33 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
Hi,
is there any admin of oooforum.org around here?
It's getting spamed with really disgusting content on the front page.
Peter
The OOoForum is fully managed
Thanks Pedro,
I agree, that Spanish donation page should not be under the openoffice.org
domain.
Jürgen's proposal for a consistent contribution/participation page across all
native language sub-sites is good.
I think Alexandro's approach is in the right spirit, but the donation
Hi Jürgen, *,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:05:07AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 11/21/11 10:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Alexandro started fixing the Spanish site, but there is more to do ...
it would be interesting to know where the problem is and what the
planned changes are. There are
Hi Ariel;
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
I'm checking out
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/es
Can one review the content and commit the changes directly
on svn? (I've
read there is some kind of web tool for this).
I will review it as the external cppunit was breaking
the build on SAL here.
Thanks!
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
Hi all,
Another category-x licensed library is gone. A
pre-installed cppunit can be used instead. The gnu make
build system needed some
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:44:20AM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I'm checking out
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ooo-site/trunk/content/es
Can one review the content and commit the changes directly
on svn? (I've
read there is some kind of web tool for this).
Hi all,
I have added a page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Update+OOo+Bugzilla+account+to+Apache+OpenOffice+Bugzilla
I don't know where to put it.
The text misses the label of the field, where you have to enter the new
mail address, because after doing it, that field is
Ed is indeed a good guy :-) and has long supported OOo and its activities
(long: as in a decade).
On 2011-11-22, at 12:58 , Rob Weir wrote:
I see from this old post that Ed thought bringing the forums together
on the OOo domain might be a good idea:
Hi,
On 2011-11-16, at 20:23 , Rob Weir wrote:
This topic sounds important, so I'm moving it to its own thread.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
removal of the Oracle branding is the easy part. As said before, having a
joint
Hello;
I am getting this after r1204995 :
...
=
Building module mythes
=
...
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating mythes.pc
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing depfiles commands
config.status:
On 22.11.2011 11:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I stumbled over problems using a downloaded epm 4.2
(http://www.epmhome.org), build and install it on a Fedora 16 system
(rpm based).
The epm call failed to build the rpm packages. It seems that epm
triggers /bin/rpm with some parameters that
Hi;
Andre's patch looks good: it passes SAL on my system.
My compile is now broken by an unrelated commit so
if someone feels confident to commit it please go
ahead.
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
I will review it as the external cppunit was breaking
the
Hi Michael,
Le 22 nov. 11 à 22:25, Michael Stahl a écrit :
On 22.11.2011 11:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I stumbled over problems using a downloaded epm 4.2 (http://
www.epmhome.org), build and install it on a Fedora 16 system (rpm
based).
The epm call failed to build the rpm packages. It
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:16:47PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
I am getting this after r1204995 :
...
=
Building module mythes
=
...
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating mythes.pc
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
Subject: Re: System broken at mythes
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 4:41 PM
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:16:47PM -0800, Pedro
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:25:43PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 22.11.2011 11:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I stumbled over problems using a downloaded epm 4.2
(http://www.epmhome.org), build and install it on a Fedora 16 system
(rpm based).
The epm call failed to build the rpm
On 2011-11-22 4:06 PM, Louis R Suárez-Potts wrote:
...
Can I suggest an agenda for a meeting—teleconference, I suppose, or its
newfangled equivalent—where we place those items that Martin (hi Martin)
mentions as well as the concerns Rob expresses?
We have a mailing list that is made for just
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:00:40PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
Subject: Re: System broken at mythes
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday,
Hi all,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Andre Fischer wrote:
2. Executable in a non-standard location. Use the
--with-dmake-path=path-to-executable option to specify its
location.
I couldn't make this work (tested on Fedora and Win/cygwin).
I tried
BTW,
Instead of setting
ENABLE_EXAMPLE=no
and then a conditional, why not just avoid the extra
conditionals and change line 88 to
PROGRAMS=
:)
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
Subject: Re:
Folks--
I have been doing some cleanup/fixing of the OOo legacy site as we're
transporting to ooo-site.apache.org.
The legacy site is QUITE large, and because of the more or less single
trunk we have now, much of what I'm doing will no doubt affect your local
repository sizes. So, if you do an
Hi Pedro
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:09:57PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
BTW,
Instead of setting
ENABLE_EXAMPLE=no
and then a conditional, why not just avoid the extra
conditionals and change line 88 to
PROGRAMS=
:)
cheers,
well, I had to modify the configure script anyway
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:59:58PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Still no joy. but it builds if I type gmake intead of make
make is BSD's parallel make (pmake) .
It looks like there is no ifeq in BSD make.
the underlying error is on the original mythes/makefile.mk:
it shouldn't set the
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 22, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 2011-11-22 4:06 PM, Louis R Suárez-Potts wrote:
...
Can I suggest an agenda for a meeting—teleconference, I suppose, or its
newfangled equivalent—where we place those items that Martin (hi
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
...
the underlying error is on the original
mythes/makefile.mk:
it shouldn't set the BUILD_ACTION to make, but to
$(GNUMAKE)
Can you try this in when $(GUI)==UNX ?
This should solve the problem :)
I tried it but it
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks--
I have been doing some cleanup/fixing of the OOo legacy site as we're
transporting to ooo-site.apache.org.
The legacy site is QUITE large, and because of the more or less single
trunk we have now, much of what
Am 23.11.11 02:54, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks--
I have been doing some cleanup/fixing of the OOo legacy site as we're
transporting to ooo-site.apache.org.
The legacy site is QUITE large, and because of the more or less
I was able to continue building and so far it looks good.
I will commit it unless something breaks in the next half
hour or so :).
Thanks Andre!
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
Andre's patch looks good: it passes SAL on my system.
My compile is now broken by an
Am 23.11.11 04:07, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
I was able to continue building and so far it looks good.
I will commit it unless something breaks in the next half
hour or so :).
Let's wait a little bit longer, that we can do same more tests. We have
time.
Thanks Andre!
Pedro.
--- On Tue,
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 23.11.11 04:07, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
I was able to continue building and so far it looks
good.
I will commit it unless something breaks in the next
half hour or so :).
Let's wait a little bit longer, that we can do
Thank you. I have updated my account successfully by following your guide.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.dewrote:
Hi all,
I have added a page
https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/**
Hello Pedro,
I'm about to start a build. Can you post your configure command line ?
This way we could define guidelines for newcomers.
Thanks,
Eric
--
qɔᴉɹə
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog :
Hi all,
I think it's time for use to discuss and detail AOO 3.4 test plan now.
Basically at current time I suggest:
1. Leverage OpenOffice users on General Usage test
2. Focus on establishing automation mechanism. Start from Build
Verification Testing(BVT in short).
3. Focus on test
67 matches
Mail list logo
