Hi Rob;
- Original Message -
...
We cannot do maintainance for broken links here. Perhaps we should
remind users to report broken links on the originating websites.
Certainly we can fix this on our end. In fact I just did:
Hi;
I tried configuring Symphony under FreeBSD and I can basically confirm
that the instructions in the Wiki are wrong. The Wiki here
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/How_to_build_Symphony's_source_code
mentions --disable-build-mozilla but that option doesn't work, you need
Hello guys;
FWIW, the update to version 2.7.3 doesnt really bring a big difference wrt
2.6.1 but I dont think we will be able to update python further in a long while
because there are extensions out there that depend on Python2.
Adding Python3 compatibility is not difficult, I think, but an
Hi Kay;
I did some basic update to the FreeBSD porting site sometime ago:
http://www.openoffice.org/porting/freebsd/
The site doesn't seem linked from the top-level porting site though.
I would prefer to spend my time on the code rather than on the release
announcement, however feel free to
. :)
Pedro.
From: drew jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com
To: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: What to say in AOO 3.4.1 release announcement about
Performing
Pre-Build Event...
Project : warning PRJ0018 : The following environment variables were not
found:
$(UPDMINOREXT)
Kind regards
Regina
Pedro Giffuni schrieb:
Committed as Revision 1367398 . Please test.
Hopefully I learned from the error that Regina reported to
cleanup better
Hello Armin;
This builds cleanly on FreeBSD/linux , and apparently at least Regina got it to
build beyond python.
That's pretty weird:
python-2.7.3.patch comments out the sqlite3 project for MSVC (just like
python-2.6.1.patch did before that).
I don't have a Windows build so I am basically
FWIW,
One hint: googling around it looks like it's and issue when building a debug
python.
Pedro.
From: Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: trunk build fails, likely in
Thank you.
I will use this as an opportunity to do some further cleanup
Pedro.
From: Lin Yuan yuanlin@gmail.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: trunk build fails, likely in python
I can reproduce this
Committed as Revision 1367398 . Please test.
Hopefully I learned from the error that Regina reported to
cleanup better the code.
Pedro.
From: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 30
+1 T-shirts are a a cheap but effective way to motivate committers.
- Original Message -
...
Hi at all
At the old OOo project, we have had T-Shirts. There was existing many
different
versions of OOo shirts. Moastly they was payed, designed and distributed by
one
of the OOo
Thank you Regina!
That crept in from a previous patchset and I didn't notice (plus the buildbots
havent been building lately).
Fixed in r1366577, by removing the extra cruft in python/makefile.mk
Pedro.
--- Ven 27/7/12, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de ha scritto:
Da: Regina Henschel
issues.
I will bringing it in either tonight or tomorrow as all our local changeshave
been preserved and it won't interfere at all with the new release.
Pedro.
--- Mer 25/7/12, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org ha scritto:
Da: Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Oggetto: Bug 119384 : Python update coming after
Hello guys;
Just wondering ..
Can I chop the Python-2.6.1 src tarball now? I left it around to make
sure I don't break anything but it shouldn't be needed in trunk anymore.
Pedro.
--- Gio 26/7/12, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
not with the Hunspell update but indirectly
Hello guys;
With some help from Hanya I have been slowly working on an update
to our internal Python. The patch is rather big but it is necessary
because:
- The older 2.6.1 python is basically unsupported upstream.
- Newer versions of python have better performance and solve
security issues.
-
: Python update coming after 3.4.1 release
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:20:44PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello guys;
With some help from Hanya I have been slowly working on an update
to our internal Python. The patch is rather big but it is necessary
because:
- The older 2.6.1
I solved the issue ... building now :).
Thank you Ariel.
I will see if I can split the patches according to the LF type to solve that
issue :(.
Pedro.
My understanding is that the unofficial Solaris-i386 port works fine
in OpenIndiana. It is built with Solaris C/C++ compiler not gcc.
Pedro.
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 2:13 PM
Subject:
Hello;
From what I understand.. AOO already starts much quicker than before.
I vote for it being disabled by default and eventually removed.
Pedro.
From: Jürgen Lange j...@juergen-lange.de
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 1:53
Just thought I'd mention this ...
- Original Message -
...
I am aware.. the idea would be to make it easier to detect when someone
does a BSD-unfriendly change ;-).
At the moment I would be glad for a buildbot that would detect
any-OS-unfriendly change.
At this time I am not
FWIW;
- Original Message -
...
Hi,
I just stumbled over a commit message for the new UOF filter.
I think we should agree on a common guideline for our code and how we
contribute changes and bring them in the code.
SCM's manage the change sets and the information who made the
Hi Rob;
If something is in the release I would expect:
1) We have instructions for building it in the Building Guide
2) A user could download our source from SVN and build it according to
the Building Guide
Is this true of the BSD port? If so we could include it in the
release, I think. If
Hi Kay;
- Original Message -
...
Eventually we should use the buildbot, but I don't think we are
ready for that yet.
Pedro, using the buildbot is NOT a requirement for offical releases
as far as I know.
I am aware.. the idea would be to make it easier to detect when
- Original Message -
...
Except for some minor patches, available here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/editors/openoffice-3-devel/files/
the instructions for building on linux apply to FreeBSD too.
The port is under control and very stable but we have
- Original Message -
...
OK, more from me on the upcoming release.
Will ee providing an official FreeBSD and OS/2 release for 3.4.1?
We had discussed this a bit in the past, but I haven't seen anything
recently.
We (actually Maho@) do regular builds but we have no plans to
Hi Maho;
- Original Message -
...
Hi, I can provide release builds to Apache community.
and how I should proceed?
I guess you could add links here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
Eventually we should use the buildbot, but I don't
Hi Peter;
I am going to be honest with you. Some people like to make asses of
themselves inpublic by posting comparisons of software they develop
against software that they have never tried (Hi Michael!).
Most of us simply don't run LibreOffice and it would not be honest to say
that we can be
...
On 2012-07-17 9:01 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
Most of us simply don't run LibreOffice
That seems unfortunate, why wouldn't AOO developers want to keep up to
date with their main competition?
Competition among free software is somewhat of a non-concept
+1
- Original Message -
...
We have this legacy page: http://www.openoffice.org/bizdev/consultants.html
Users get to it via three main paths:
1) Google search for openoffice consultants
2) The OpenOffice.org Consultants Directory link from our main support
page;
--- Ven 13/7/12, Greg Madden ha scritto:
...
I have been testing the Symphony deb packages. The 'properties' area
is a nice feature, not compelling enough to re-base AOO on Symphony.
AOO has progressed, new feaures that I use more than the 'properties
area'.
thanks for the feedback.
Hi Simon and everyone;
--- Gio 12/7/12, Shenfeng Liu ha scritto:
...
What hasn't been discussed in detail, and the key issue
to me, is how much OpenOffice plus Symphony would
differ from Symphony plus OpenOffice.
Ideally, finally there will be little difference between
OpenOffice
--- Gio 12/7/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
I think we all agree two years is a lot of time.
We can always start with option I and re-evaluate
later on.
I would propose the following:
For 3.x Release (x4) we go option I merging only
the things that
FWIW;
--- Gio 12/7/12, Yuri Dario ha scritto:
Hi,
I finally discovered the cause of a strange crash on some pc
for the os2 port. It is due to an invalid float operation in
MetricField class. It seems that some CPU are processing
some invalid float value, which in turn generates the
Hi Andrea;
--- Mer 11/7/12, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Speaking with (too) little knowledge of the effort involved,
I would keep a 3.4.x series with periodic bugfix releases,
but use the trunk directly for a 4.0 release including the
UI changes from Symphony and
11/7/12, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org ha scritto:
Hi Andrea;
--- Mer 11/7/12, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
ha scritto:
...
Speaking with (too) little knowledge of the effort
involved,
I would keep a 3.4.x series with periodic bugfix
releases,
but use the trunk directly
Just my $0.02
--- Mar 10/7/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
But of course the open source ethos is release early;
release often.
So we need some way to balance that as well.
I don't think that would play well for this project. It
has certainly been bad for other projects
The site is cool but on an unrelated comment ...
--- Lun 9/7/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
This looks
interesting/useful: https://comments.apache.org/
Would this make sense for our core files under /ooo-site ?
Quoting the site:
If you are not a committer, you will
Hello Simon;
I know rebasing from Symphony option was never very
popular here.
Just for the record, I ran a small experiment in
the Symphony SVN: I used svn merge to bring some
changes from AOO. The process was rather easy and
fun.
I find the Symphony team did a good job updating a
lot of stuff
--- Gio 5/7/12, hongyun.an hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn ha scritto:
Dear everyone:
About a week ago,the UOF v2.0 source code was merged to the
Aoo3.4(svn version1354914) on my com.And it works well.
However,because of my negligence,I have lost my
password.These days I am applying for
Hello;
--- Mer 4/7/12, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
OpenOffice should be rewritten in
JavaFX.
OpenOffice is simply too big to propose rewriting it all
to a different language.
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Pedro.
--- Gio 5/7/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
I know rebasing from Symphony option was never very
popular here.
Just for the record, I ran a small experiment in
the Symphony
Hi;
--- Gio 5/7/12, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Ther's an OpenJDK port for the Nokia N9.
That's modern in my book.
I guess that by modern you
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto:
...
Please can we have an update on that effort to get all the
CWS made available then? It seems a perfectly reasonable
request, one I and others have been making here since the
inception of the project and one I am not able to go
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto:
...
On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
ha scritto:
...
Please can we have an update on that effort to get
all the
CWS made available then? It seems
--- Mar 3/7/12, Bjoern Michaelsen ha scritto:
Hi Ross,
Thanks for the constructive reply!
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler
wrote:
If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is
available under the AL2.
How can I check that? It was not integrated in
--- Gio 28/6/12, hongyun.an hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn ha scritto:
...
Dear everyone:
Thanks to all your help,so far I have finished merging the
UOF v2.0 source code to the Aoo3.4(svn version1354914) both
on the Windows and Linux.
The source code is 33 files and about 2M，mainly in
Hi Hongyun;
--- Gio 28/6/12, hongyun.an hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn ha scritto:
...
By the way,here is the file list:
filter/prj/d.lst;
filter/source/config/fragments/fcfg_calc.mk;
filter/source/config/fragments/fcfg_impress.mk;
filter/source/config/fragments/fcfg_writer.mk;
--- Mer 27/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Top posting as a comment on the
entire post, and what it is and what it isn't.
In a recent article [1], later quoted in in LinuxToday [2],
a LibreOffice board member was interviewed and made some
erroneous statements regarding
Hi Kevin;
--- Mer 27/6/12, Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hello All,
Sorry for top post.
Where are we at? Have we summarized the discussion? Have all
expressed their views?
How might we crystallized our position and move forward?
There is indeed a big problem.
Thank you Andre!
This is a huge help for packagers.
cheers,
Pedro.
ps. It almost makes me feel bad about Italy beating
Germany yet again next Thursday (just kidding ...
we'll see ;) )
--- Mar 26/6/12, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de ha scritto:
Hi all,
I just checked in my changes for issue
Will surely miss you Lily!!
Best of lucks in your new role, I am sure you will do fine!
Pedro.
--- Mar 26/6/12, Xia Zhao lilyzh...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Dear all,
Due to my job role change, I have to spend much time on new
position to
face many challenges, so I may haven't much time on
--- Lun 25/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
...
Most fixes are probably fixed on trunk first and merged
after some
discussion on the branch. But do we need a fix direction
here? I think
no because it really depends on the issue. Keep in mind that
we have
some
Answering to myself,
--- Lun 25/6/12, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
--- Lun 25/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
ha scritto:
...
We should use svn merge to integrate a fix from one
code
base into another one.
I am not a svn:mergeinfo expert but I
Ugh ...
--- Dom 24/6/12, De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML
(wordml) filters broken as release blocker
A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Data: Domenica 24 giugno 2012, 20:14
2012, 22:18
2012/6/25 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
Ugh ...
--- Dom 24/6/12, De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com
ha scritto:
Da: De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug
118057 [filter] word 2003
XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker
Hi;
--- Gio 21/6/12, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.com ha scritto:
...
For me in the order of preference I would use:
- #number# (we have only one tracker, no need for
flags like 'i')
- #inumber#
I would not like plain number + :, it is just too
hard to recognize (also to grep for).
--- Lun 18/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Pedro Giffuni
wrote:
...
I certainly think this makes sense.
Discriminating the Category-B tarballs in the mirrors
is easier and does not give the impression that it is
ASF code or that we
--- Lun 18/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
Andre did a nice job but the category B tarballs are
still in SVN so I dont consider the issue has been
solved.
Do you have any proposal for how that could addressed
without breaking the released AOO 3.4.0 source
--- Gio 14/6/12, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de ha scritto:
...
And I think it's not just about emotions. If you take A
as base and pick the enhancements of B you'll get an
enhanced A. You won't probably
remove features from A but take only some of B.
So the decision between
Welcome!!
--- Gio 14/6/12, Fan Zheng zheng.easy...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Hi, Everybody:
This is Zheng Fan speaking.
Well, I am a brand new face in AOO community, with
subscribing the ooo-dev
mailing list just 2 weeks ago.
I start working in IBM Symhony project in 2003 and being
focus
--- Mer 13/6/12, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Can we really not have the java components from
Symphony?
Why? Java is an asset rather than a problem.
Oh, you misunderstood .. I *want* them. I even updated
most of our Java
On 06/11/12 20:08, Rob Weir wrote:
As we wait [0] for the Symphony [1] code to be loaded into Subversion
I think it would be good to start a discussion on next steps of how
we can make best use of this contribution.
Hopefully you've had time to review the list of features on the wiki
[2],
On 06/11/12 22:24, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Predictably, I prefer approach I on first principles:
Never derail the train that's running.
From that perspective, there's all of this:
- All of the developers and many testers and others know
how to build AOO 3.4.0 including people who are
This is excellent news!
Thank you Hongyun An, we are delighted to have this huge
development for/from the Chinese community!
Pedro.
--- Dom 10/6/12, hongyun.an hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn ha scritto:
Hi,everyone:
My name is Hongyun An and I am serving in
--- Lun 11/6/12, hongyun.an hongyun...@cs2c.com.cn ha scritto:
...
Data: Lunedì 11 giugno 2012, 00:20
You are welcome.We hope it will be
more compatible between the ODF and UOF2.0.
Could anybody tell me how submit the code?
--
I guess it depends on the size. One option
would be
FWIW,
--- Ven 8/6/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile ha scritto:
...
If Marina was in the internship program, then she was not an
Oracle employee, and the joint copyright assignment she
signed does not take her rights over the code. AINAL,
but I guess the situation is different
with code written by
Hello Eike;
--- Ven 8/6/12, Eike Rathke ha scritto:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2012-05-23 13:54:31 +0200, Regina Henschel
wrote:
For AOO itself the CWS calcishmakkica is important.
I'd like to bring this up on the radar again. The CWS
contains important work implementing spreadsheet
Hi Ariel;
--- Ven 8/6/12, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
You are missing the context:
- the Internship was
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Internship
- it was payed by Team OpenOffice.org on behalf of the
Community Council
with
--- Gio 7/6/12, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ha scritto:
...
Data: Giovedì 7 giugno 2012, 00:57
http://www.libreofficeaustralia.org/lt/community/blog/planet/20110328/porting-libreoffice-x64-windows
No idea why that blog post of mine shows up on that site,
and in a Lithuanian (lt) subdirectory
Hi Andre;
--- Gio 7/6/12, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de ha scritto:
Hi Pedro,
I just saw that you have removed the -u flag from some copy
commands in instsetoo_native/util/makefile.mk
Can you explain why? Is there a Windows-only problem
with the copy command? Maybe this has to be done
and what should be highlighted.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Pedro Giffuni
p...@apache.org
wrote:
--- Lun 4/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto:
I guess there's going to be no way to
convince
people to use SVN correctly (hint:
svn merge). :(
I simply haven't thought
--- Mer 6/6/12, Yong Lin Ma mayo...@apache.org ha scritto:
Pedro,
Could you update it with svn merge example you mentioned
before?
That was why we start this.
Yes, it's rather easy (we don't need all the stuff
the FreeBSD primer does) but I have been very busy lately.
I don't have a WM
On 06/06/12 21:20, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Mer 6/6/12, Yong Lin Mamayo...@apache.org ha scritto:
Pedro,
Could you update it with svn merge example you mentioned
before?
That was why we start this.
Yes, it's rather easy (we don't need all the stuff
the FreeBSD primer does) but I have been
--- Mar 5/6/12, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de ha scritto:
..
Hi Pedro,
On 04.06.2012 22:05, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Thank you Andre!
I normally dislike perl but external_libs.lst surely
looks nice now.
Thanks. Well, I dislike Python and did not want to introduce
yet another scripting
--- Lun 4/6/12, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
The .org is in Apache is probably too
clever, but it the rest of the
article is fine.
Wolf
Hmm ... OK, maybe its better not to be too fancy.
Lets leave it out then.
Pedro.
Hmm...
Unrelated to the bug fix ...
--- Lun 4/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto:
...
patch reviewed, tested and applied to AOO34 branch and
trunk
I guess there's going to be no no way to convince people
to use SVN correctly (hint: svn merge). :(
I will merge some minor fixes so that people
--- Lun 4/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto:
I guess there's going to be no way to convince
people to use SVN correctly (hint: svn merge). :(
I simply haven't thought about it but I agree svn merge
would have been better here. Especially when we want to
merge the whole branch later to
Thank you Andre!
I normally dislike perl but external_libs.lst surely
looks nice now.
One wish for the future .. hmm.. if I use the external
package (for example for python) it would be nice to
disable downloading the corresponding tarballs too.
BTW, should I also upload the Category A tarballs
brief how do you hope the info will
be
organized and what should be highlighted.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
--- Lun 4/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt ha scritto:
I guess there's going to be no way to
convince
people to use SVN correctly (hint: svn
FWIW,
The Foundation Roles are explained here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles
Pretty much in line to what you are thinking.
Pedro.
--- Dom 3/6/12, Yong Lin Ma mayo...@gmail.com ha scritto:
This was a discussion about rules of
voting for new committer and PPMC
--- Dom 3/6/12, RGB ES ha scritto:
...
Maybe add both, old and new logo side by side? But I think
the post is
just perfect as it is now: short and to the point.
I would add one line to wrap things up:
The .org is now in Apache.
Cheers,
Pedro.
--- Dom 3/6/12, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re: Draft Blog post: OpenOffice.org is now Apache OpenOffice
A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Data: Domenica 3 giugno 2012, 17:23
On 06/03/2012 12:50 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote
--- Sab 2/6/12, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com ha scritto:
This situation doesn't seem to be
diffusing itself,
even tho I have tried to explain that the 3.4.0 release
deps packaging does not comply with infra policy.
Surely there is a middle ground here- that the missing
release
...
--- Dom 3/6/12, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net ha scritto:
...
On 06/03/2012 11:48 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
FWIW,
The Foundation Roles are explained here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles
yes, this is standard ASF policy.
My question
to this policy if
they are included as
part of the Apache product./
So even when Category B tarballs appear to be
optional,
in practice they are part of the product and we
shouldn't
be distributing source code.
cheers,
Pedro.
On 06/01/12 20:08, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Ross
On 06/02/12 15:11, Juergen Schmidt wrote:
...
Well I am a committer in the only big UNIX-like
distribution that is carrying Apache OpenOffice
nowadays. We would really like to use a source
distribution through ASF mirrors but since the ASF
doesn't provide one that works well we have been
Hi Jürgen;
On 06/01/12 03:16, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 5/31/12 6:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
First of all we should clarify what a source release is in this context.
Does our source release contain Category-A tarballs? In other
words, does this file:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo
Ugh ...
--- Ven 1/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
No release is buildable on its own. You need an
operating system, a compiler, often other pre-existing
libraries on the system, other prerequisites that need
to be installed by the developers.
And computers need
--- Ven 1/6/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
And computers need electricity, which is not free and
not available under a compatible license. I wish you
could keep focused or at least do an effort to
understand the issues so we can solve them.
Be nice.
Couldn't
Hi Ross;
I don't think it's my turn since my issues remain unresolved.
However let me recap:
1) I think just having patches that can or cannot be applied
to category-B licensed code is OK as long as it is not the
default.
2) I don't think we are allowed to distribute source tarballs
in
product./
So even when Category B tarballs appear to be optional,
in practice they are part of the product and we shouldn't
be distributing source code.
cheers,
Pedro.
On 06/01/12 20:08, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Ross;
I don't think it's my turn since my issues remain unresolved.
However let me
Hi Jürgen;
Let me clarify some issues too ...
On 05/31/12 10:39, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
...
let me explain some details here because I think they can help to
understand.
1. we have dependencies to several external libraries including
category-b for some features
2. we have checked in all this
Hi Andre;
--- Mer 30/5/12, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de ha scritto:
...
The idea that we have remaining issues with Category-B
tarballs in the tree has been around since before the
release, and one of our mentors (Ross I recall) did
acknowledge my point of view.
I did offer to step
--- Mer 30/5/12, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On 2012-05-30, at 11:05 , Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I will do this next week. I will probably use Apache
extras and
at a later time we could leave there the old GPL'd
stuff too
(unsupported of course).
Pedro
Oh boy ...
--- Mer 30/5/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
You can copy the category-b binaries someplace else, but you
must not remove the ones that are already here. Otherwise you
will break not only the buildbots, but you will also break
every one who has downloaded the
--- Mer 30/5/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org ha scritto:
So *NOW* you are admitting that those tarballs are
part
of the Release??
Not at all. But they are referenced from build
files. I hope this distinction is clear.
No. If they are just referenced then we don't depend
on
Hi Drew;
--- Mar 29/5/12, drew d...@baseanswers.com ha scritto:
snip
Yes the situation was specifically postponed as a graduation
issue, I am not going through that discussion again.
I made a concrete proposal with two alternatives:
- They are moved to a friendly ftp/http site.
Hi;
--- Mar 29/5/12, sebb seb...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
This is admittedly a stop gap solution to comply
better with the Apache policies, the real fix would
be to work collectively on replacing the code that
can be replaced:
Alternatively, it is possible to include cat B [1]
Hi Rob;
On 05/28/12 13:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I'd like to start the graduation process, with the aim of being a TLP
in time for the 3.4.1 release.
The IPMC has a Guide to Successful Graduation page with a lot of
detail and advice: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
The calendar
On 05/28/12 14:25, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rob;
On 05/28/12 13:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I'd like to start the graduation process, with the aim of being a TLP
in time for the 3.4.1 release.
The IPMC has a Guide to Successful
101 - 200 of 838 matches
Mail list logo
