: Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:01:15 -0700
What does release-candidate voting at the Apache OpenOffice podling mean?
Is it is just an assessment of support/sentiment, or is there more
On 25.04.2012 04:18, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
[...]
(3) When building from source there was no warning about the inclusion of
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
Sorry, thought you
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
Hi.
2012/4/22 Claudio Filho filh...@gmail.com
Hi
2012/4/22 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
Blog post:
http://www.escritoriolivre.org/artigo/extens%C3%B5es-no-apache-openoffice
This is Luiz, our old OOo/BrOo user group leader in Brazil.
snip
And how
we haven't a brazilian portuguese
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built (binary) version? There was some discussion about this,
and, yes, there are notes about this on general information
El día 22 de abril de 2012 16:51, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org escribió:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built (binary) version? There was some discussion
On 04/22/2012 08:05 AM, RGB ES wrote:
El d�a 22 de abril de 2012 16:51, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org escribi�:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already built (binary) version? There was some discussion about this,
and,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
OK, I have a question on this one. MUST we download and build or can we vote
on an already
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
The SDK and Binaries are missing the DISCLAIMER file. Is a missing Incubation
DISCLAIMER in a binary package enough to prevent release? I think probably not,
but this may be an edge case. The application
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
Sorry, thought you answered your own question there. But since you
bring it up, there is no requirement for a DISCLAIMER file.
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
Sorry, thought you answered your own question there. But since you
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
snip
You snipped out the important part:
On Monday, 23. April 2012 at 04:29, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47
Hi.
2012/4/22 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Apr 22, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
Hi
2012/4/22 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
Blog post:
http://www.escritoriolivre.org/artigo/extens%C3%B5es-no-apache-openoffice
This is Luiz, our old OOo/BrOo user group leader in Brazil. And how
we haven't a brazilian portuguese list here, i started the work
(localization and some tests) in
Some formalities:
1. Please do not discuss the voting on the [VOTE] thread. It makes it more
difficult to track the individual votes. Use a [DISCUSS][VOTE] thread instead.
2. Please cast all votes on ooo-dev@ incubator.apache.org. Cross-posting to
ooo-private by non-PPMC members simply
What does release-candidate voting at the Apache OpenOffice podling mean?
Is it is just an assessment of support/sentiment, or is there more involved?
The ballot has this phrasing:
But we invite all people to vote (non-binding) on this RC. We would like
to provide a release that is
:01
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: 'xia zhao'; ooo...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
[ ... ]
PARTICIPATE IN QUALITY-ASSURANCE COVERAGE OF THE CANDIDATE
It is valuable to download the source code and confirm that binaries can
On 04/21/2012 01:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
What does release-candidate voting at the Apache OpenOffice podling
mean?
Is it is just an assessment of support/sentiment, or is there more
involved?
The ballot has this phrasing:
But we invite all people to vote (non-binding) on this RC.
. Although there are many placeholders, I think it
provides a good picture of the essentials.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 16:22
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1
On 04/21/2012 01:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[ ... ]
Committers and PPMC members are expected to cast informed ballots.
If any contributor casts a -1, it should be accompanied
23 matches
Mail list logo
