Do you mean the outdated symbol, which should do just fine ??
Jan.
On 26 October 2012 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/25/12 9:19 PM, jan iversen wrote:
Maybe we could move them to an archive ??
I think we can find probably common consensus that we want to
Jan;
No the outdated symbol is different. {{Delete}} Is a template that puts
the article in a special category to be deleted by an admin or by a bot.
Keith
jan iversen wrote:
Do you mean the outdated symbol, which should do just fine ??
Jan.
On 26 October 2012 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt
So if an article is outdated, then it is ready for deletionor ???
Is it wise to have outdated articles alongside the correct/newer ones,
thinking of e.g. building instructions it would at least confuse me.
but I have no problem using {{Delete}} thanks for advicing me.
jan.
On 26 October
Jan;
{{Documentation/Outdated}} and {{delete}} are two seperate entities.
Outdated merely says that some inormation is outdated and should be
revised. {{delete}} is a special case that marks a file for speedy
deletion by an wiki administrator.
At least with the user documentation we tend to
Thanks for clearing that up. I have just been searching for build
instructions (again), and in the search response I cannot see if an article
is outdated, so I had to open some before I got the correct one.
Would it be an idea (if possible) to have outdated as a category, and
extend the search to
2012/10/26 jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
Thanks for clearing that up. I have just been searching for build
instructions (again), and in the search response I cannot see if an article
is outdated, so I had to open some before I got the correct one.
Would it be an idea (if possible) to
So it is just a matter of having a checkbox next to the the search (upper
corner) ?
but I assume the setup of wiki is INFRA and not something we control
locally, so a change is not very easy (or how to request such a change) ?
jan.
On 26 October 2012 21:36, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks or that Ricardo, I had forgotten that outdated also assigned the
category.
Regards
Keith
RGB ES wrote:
2012/10/26 jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
Thanks for clearing that up. I have just been searching for build
instructions (again), and in the search response I cannot see if an
To my knowledge, articles that are marked outdated with a reference to a
newer article stays in Wiki.
Would it not be a good idea to remove such pages, in order not to confuse
users ??
There are however no means, which I can find, to do that ?
Reason for my idea/question is that I am looking at
Nobody want to delete information and wiki pages only admin can
actually delete pages. Even then there might be some rights about
ownership. Is like sourceforge dont delete inactive projects.
Still good conversation to debate.
On 10/25/12, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
To my
Maybe we could move them to an archive ??
jan
On 25 October 2012 21:12, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
Nobody want to delete information and wiki pages only admin can
actually delete pages. Even then there might be some rights about
ownership. Is like sourceforge dont delete
2012/10/25 jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
To my knowledge, articles that are marked outdated with a reference to a
newer article stays in Wiki.
Would it not be a good idea to remove such pages, in order not to confuse
users ??
There are however no means, which I can find, to do that ?
12 matches
Mail list logo
