I'd suggest being even more patient. In my experience people don't give
answers to general queries involving legal issues. A specific question,
like "please can we we have CWS foo since the community wishes to integrate
it" is more likely to get a response.
The general case, as far as we are aware
On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
>> ...
>>>
>>> On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps
>>> ha scritto:
...
>>>
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>
> --- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
> ...
> >
> > On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > --- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps
> > ha scritto:
> > > ...
> > >>
> > >> Please can we have an update on that effort to get
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> Thanks for the constructive reply!
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
>> the AL2.
>
> How can I check that? It was not i
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> Thanks for the constructive reply!
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> > If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
> > the AL2.
>
> How can I check that?
--- Mar 3/7/12, Bjoern Michaelsen ha scritto:
> Hi Ross,
>
> Thanks for the constructive reply!
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> > If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is
> > available under the AL2.
>
> How can I check that? It was not inte
Hi Ross,
Thanks for the constructive reply!
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
> If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
> the AL2.
How can I check that? It was not integrated in m106 at OOo, if that is the
criteria, but I assume there is
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
...
>
> On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> >
> > --- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps
> ha scritto:
> > ...
> >>
> >> Please can we have an update on that effort to get
> all the
> >> CWS made available then? It seems a perfectly
> reasonable
On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> --- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
> ...
>>
>> Please can we have an update on that effort to get all the
>> CWS made available then? It seems a perfectly reasonable
>> request, one I and others have been making here since the
>> inceptio
Hi Bjoern,
If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
the AL2. If it was not included in that original SGA, you want to
bring it here and the OpenOffice project want to see the work
committed then Oracle will, in all likelihood, make it available to
us.
Therefore, I su
Hi Olli,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
> I did not see any aggressive tone in Rob's reply.
Nitpicking on irrelevant sideissues might be acceptable, if the main topics of
the mail were answered -- otherwise its just unconstructive passive aggreesion.
Nothi
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
...
>
> Please can we have an update on that effort to get all the
> CWS made available then? It seems a perfectly reasonable
> request, one I and others have been making here since the
> inception of the project and one I am not able to go
> negotiate pe
On 3 Jul 2012, at 14:19, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did
Hi Björn,
On 03.07.2012 14:58, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
be convenient not having to
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
>> > b
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
> > be convenient not having to recreate. According to:
> >
> >
> > http
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
> be convenient not having to recreate. According to:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktikvbfnr1v
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
be convenient not having to recreate. According to:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktikvbfnr1viwqyw1+spzf68zx5g...@mail.gmail.com%3E
ownership of the CWS is now at
18 matches
Mail list logo
