I'd suggest being even more patient. In my experience people don't give
answers to general queries involving legal issues. A specific question,
like please can we we have CWS foo since the community wishes to integrate
it is more likely to get a response.
The general case, as far as we are aware,
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
be convenient not having to recreate. According to:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201106.mbox/%3cbanlktikvbfnr1viwqyw1+spzf68zx5g...@mail.gmail.com%3E
ownership of the CWS is now
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
be convenient not having to recreate. According to:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which would
be convenient not having to recreate. According
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did some
Hi Björn,
On 03.07.2012 14:58, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi all,
back in my Oracle days I did some work in CWS swbookmarkfixes01 which
On 3 Jul 2012, at 14:19, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 07:53:25AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto:
...
Please can we have an update on that effort to get all the
CWS made available then? It seems a perfectly reasonable
request, one I and others have been making here since the
inception of the project and one I am not able to go
Hi Olli,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
I did not see any aggressive tone in Rob's reply.
Nitpicking on irrelevant sideissues might be acceptable, if the main topics of
the mail were answered -- otherwise its just unconstructive passive aggreesion.
Hi Bjoern,
If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
the AL2. If it was not included in that original SGA, you want to
bring it here and the OpenOffice project want to see the work
committed then Oracle will, in all likelihood, make it available to
us.
Therefore, I
On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto:
...
Please can we have an update on that effort to get all the
CWS made available then? It seems a perfectly reasonable
request, one I and others have been making here since the
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto:
...
On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
ha scritto:
...
Please can we have an update on that effort to get
all the
CWS made available then? It seems a
Hi Ross,
Thanks for the constructive reply!
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
the AL2.
How can I check that? It was not integrated in m106 at OOo, if that is the
criteria, but I assume there is
--- Mar 3/7/12, Bjoern Michaelsen ha scritto:
Hi Ross,
Thanks for the constructive reply!
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler
wrote:
If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is
available under the AL2.
How can I check that? It was not integrated in
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:44:30PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Ross,
Thanks for the constructive reply!
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
the AL2.
How can I check that? It was
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Ross,
Thanks for the constructive reply!
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 03:58:54PM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
If the CWS was included in the original SGA then it is available under
the AL2.
How can I
On Jul 3, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com ha scritto:
...
On 3 Jul 2012, at 15:29, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Mar 3/7/12, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
ha
17 matches
Mail list logo
