Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-14 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/14/12 12:48 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 2012-03-13 3:33 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: None of which answer my question. Shouldn't the release be Apache OpenOffice 3.4? The wiki page

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-14 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2012-03-14 2:54 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 3/14/12 12:48 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: I thought the discussion several months ago decided on Apache OpenOffice for both the project and application. If that is correct, when are you going to change the name of the application? The full change

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Sergey Torokhov
It's pity but it seems there is will not be progress this problem :( as there is no any activity and reply on appropriate bug page from developers is planning some changes or not. Is there at least anybody of Russian localisation team ? I'm not success to find fresh mail list - the one of the

Re[2]: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Yakov Reztsov
13 марта 2012, 23:18 от Sergey Torokhov It's pity but it seems there is will not be progress this problem :( as there is no any activity and reply on appropriate bug page from developers is planning some changes or not. Is there at least anybody of Russian localisation team ? I'm not

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Torokhov Sergey
It's pity but it seems there is will not be progress this problem :( as there is no any activity and reply on appropriate bug page from developers is planning some changes or not. Is there at least anybody of Russian localisation team ? I'm not success to find fresh mail list - the one of the

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Sergey Torokhov torohov_...@mail.ru wrote: It's pity but it seems there is will not be progress this problem :( as there is no any activity and reply on appropriate bug page from developers is planning some changes or not. Please think of it like this: We

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi Sergey, On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:59:20PM +0400, Torokhov Sergey wrote: It's pity but it seems there is will not be progress this problem :( as there is no any activity and reply on appropriate bug page from developers is planning some changes or not. AOO developers are now fixing

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM Rob Weir wrote: We are in our final weeks of testing and bug fixing for our OpenOffice 3.4 release. I thought the product name was changed to Apache OpenOffice. Shouldn't the release be Apache OpenOffice 3.4? Or are you going to use OpenOffice.org 3.4? Or, as you

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM  Rob Weir wrote: We are in our final weeks of testing and bug fixing for our OpenOffice 3.4 release. I thought the product name was changed to Apache OpenOffice. Shouldn't the release be

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2012-03-13 2:28 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM Rob Weir wrote: We are in our final weeks of testing and bug fixing for our OpenOffice 3.4 release. I thought the product name was changed to Apache

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:28 PM  Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com  wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM  Rob Weir wrote: We are in our final weeks of testing and bug fixing for

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2012-03-13 2:55 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:28 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:05 PM Rob Weir wrote: We are in our final

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:55 PM  Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com  wrote: On 2012-03-13 2:28 PM  Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Larry

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Torokhov Sergey
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Sergey Torokhov torohov_...@mail.ru wrote: It's pity but it seems there is will not be progress this problem :( as there is no any activity and reply on appropriate bug page from developers is planning some changes or not. Please think of it like this:

Re: Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-13 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2012-03-13 3:33 PM Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Larry Gusaaslarry.gus...@gmail.com wrote: None of which answer my question. Shouldn't the release be Apache OpenOffice 3.4? The wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Current+Status+FAQ states:

Implementation of genitive case of month names (posessive context)

2012-03-12 Thread Sergey Torokhov
Hi to all,  previously I try to write to incubator.apache.org about this but encouted some encoding problem of theme header, and I try again So, the promlem is that ... for a long time (about 6 years) there is a feature request conserns Date Format representation as current one doesn't