On 9/20/2012 00:12, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 06:22:29PM -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 09/19/2012 08:34 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if
-1.
Herbert,
I would like to save you the effort to make the change, even if it
won't cost much.
The key thing here is we should be careful and avoid opening duplicate
or invalid issues as many as we can.
I would like to see some concrete examples, especially invalid issues.
And see if this is
Mee too:
-1
Regards,
Olaf
Am 20.09.2012 15:55, schrieb Yong Lin Ma:
-1.
Herbert,
I would like to save you the effort to make the change, even if it
won't cost much.
The key thing here is we should be careful and avoid opening duplicate
or invalid issues as many as we can.
I would like to
On 20.09.2012 16:54, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/20/2012 00:12, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if
Hi,
Yong Lin Ma schrieb:
-1.
Herbert,
I would like to save you the effort to make the change, even if it
won't cost much.
The key thing here is we should be careful and avoid opening duplicate
or invalid issues as many as we can.
I would like to see some concrete examples, especially invalid
Sure. This is not to blame anyone. We are all here to contribute.
We all can learn and grow from this. On the other hand, it proved
again that expertise is needed to open high quality issues.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Regina Henschel
rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi,
Yong Lin Ma
On 20.09.2012 22:20, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 20.09.2012 16:54, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/20/2012 00:12, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED.
On 9/19/12 1:47 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
For comparing do a search with:
Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
and status changed from
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the confirmed status when submitting a
new issue,
default status is confirmed - and you have to select Show Advanced
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the confirmed status when submitting a
new
On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 14:41, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
even if the reporter has canconfirm
2012/9/19 O.Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
Hi Olaf,
O.Felka schrieb:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
even if the
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:52:44PM +0200, O.Felka wrote:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be
On 9/19/2012 07:47, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
For comparing do a search with:
Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
and status changed from
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012 um 17:10 schrieb O.Felka:
We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify
their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has
to re-test to confirm a well tested bug.
So we should trust the QA who has 'canconfirm'
I believe default status is CONFIRMED or not is not Regina's concern. To
reduce DUPLICATED defect, it require reporter search BZ carefully to find
if there is any similar defect opened before, but how to query BZ it
depends on reporter's knowledge and which keyword he used. We cannot make
zero
Hi,
Ji Yan schrieb:
I believe default status is CONFIRMED or not is not Regina's concern.
Yes. It is about the fact, that people who are not simple users but
involved here in the project produce a lot of duplicate or invalid issues.
To
reduce DUPLICATED defect, it require reporter search
On 09/19/2012 08:34 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set
On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set
23 matches
Mail list logo
