Hi Andrea,
On Sunday, 2011-07-03 18:27:09 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
2) OpenOffice.org 3.4 is mostly ready. I built the latest code from hg
a couple weeks ago and I've regularly used it so far. The quality is
good and there is no risk of damaging the OOo reputation. All
release
cleaned up to meet with ASF policy.
- Original Message
From: Eike Rathke o...@erack.de
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, July 4, 2011 9:06:52 AM
Subject: Re: Releasing OOo 3.4 on the old infrastructure
Hi Andrea,
On Sunday, 2011-07-03 18:27:09 +0200, Andrea Pescetti
@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, July 4, 2011 9:11:09 AM
Subject: Re: Releasing OOo 3.4 on the old infrastructure
Point of reference: the subversion project used non-ASF infrastructure
to conduct releases that would've been blocked by ASF policy on licensing
had they used our mirror system
On 4 Jul 2011, at 18:01, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If the Oracle grant (a license) applies to the code at a particular snapshot
in time, then I assume that changes to that code after that might not be
covered (however covered by the CLA to Oracle/Sun), and certainly anything
which
Hi, Simon,
On 7/4/2011 17:27, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 4 Jul 2011, at 18:01, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If the Oracle grant (a license) applies to the code at a particular snapshot in
time, then I assume that changes to that code after that might not be covered
(however covered by the CLA to
: Monday, July 04, 2011 15:15
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Releasing OOo 3.4 on the old infrastructure
On Jul 4, 2011, at 3:04 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
[ ... ]
Without being able to view the private agreement, I'd like to mention a
couple of off-beat items which I hope are included
regarding distribution) can and should
be explored.
(IMO).
- Original Message
From: Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Sent: Mon, July 4, 2011 8:17:58 PM
Subject: Re: Releasing OOo 3.4 on the old infrastructure
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4
why not let the discussions happen wherever, including here?
- Original Message
From: Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, July 4, 2011 9:32:34 PM
Subject: Re: Releasing OOo 3.4 on the old infrastructure
IMHO, if we're discussing a non-Apache
On 19/06/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Would it be possible to release OOo 3.4 on the old (Oracle-owned)
infrastructure, and maybe take advantage of this release to educate
users and volunteers about the coming new infrastructure at Apache?
... I take for granted that the community would support
On 07/03/2011 10:35 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Andrea Pescettipesce...@openoffice.orgwrote:
On 19/06/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Would it be possible to release OOo 3.4 on the old (Oracle-owned)
infrastructure, and maybe take advantage of this release to
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
I understand that the necessary code reorganization in the Apache
project will forbid a public release for months.
Aside from the obvious technical tasks of producing code, translation
and documentation, a release
Hi all,
Don't you fast on Saturday?
:)
We are in Rome.
Thanks,
khirano
On 19 June 2011 11:23, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
Would it be possible to release OOo 3.4 on the old (Oracle-owned)
infrastructure, and maybe take advantage of this release to educate
users and volunteers about the coming new infrastructure at Apache?
+1 - and delay the
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.orgwrote:
I understand that the necessary code reorganization in the Apache
project will forbid a public release for months.
On the other hand, OpenOffice.org 3.4 beta has been out for several
weeks, is regarded by our QA
Hi,
On the other hand, OpenOffice.org 3.4 beta has been out for several
weeks, is regarded by our QA testers as remarkably stable, has a
dedicated code line and it is not far from release.
+1
since OO 3.4 beta1 a lot of issues have been fixed in cws's
(for example:
Op 19-6-2011 12:23, Andrea Pescetti schreef:
I understand that the necessary code reorganization in the Apache
project will forbid a public release for months.
On the other hand, OpenOffice.org 3.4 beta has been out for several
weeks, is regarded by our QA testers as remarkably stable, has a
16 matches
Mail list logo
